Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Hearing protection device" in English language version.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link){{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link){{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link){{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) link{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)... the majority's adoption of a cost-benefit test amounted to an unauthorized amendment of the standard.Commissioner Cleary’s view
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)Personal protective devices are generally not a good permanent solution for a number of reasons. ... They may not work effectively because of the difficulty in getting acceptable fit for each individual. In some cases-particularly when noise is intermittent and below 85 dB(A) - they may make communication more difficult, which can contribute to accidents and make jobs more difficult to perform.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)Instrument accuracy must be taken into account ... . Type-2 dosimeters are considered to have an error of ±2 dBA, and the Action Level must be corrected, accordingly. For example, for an 8-hour shift, the corrected Action Level would be 87 dBA ...
... has recommended HPD fit-testing as a best practice and valuable training tool that can help in training the worker to achieve an optimal fit
... the majority's adoption of a cost-benefit test amounted to an unauthorized amendment of the standard.Commissioner Cleary’s view
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)