Larsson A, Mellstedt H (February 1992). "Chicken antibodies: a tool to avoid interference by human anti-mouse antibodies in ELISA after in vivo treatment with murine monoclonal antibodies". Hybridoma. 11 (1): 33–9. doi:10.1089/hyb.1992.11.33. PMID1737638.
Bolstad N, Warren DJ, Nustad K (October 2013). "Heterophilic antibody interference in immunometric assays". Best Practice & Research. Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 27 (5): 647–61. doi:10.1016/j.beem.2013.05.011. hdl:10852/72708. PMID24094636.
Bolstad N, Warren DJ, Nustad K (October 2013). "Heterophilic antibody interference in immunometric assays". Best Practice & Research. Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 27 (5): 647–61. doi:10.1016/j.beem.2013.05.011. hdl:10852/72708. PMID24094636.
mayomedicallaboratories.com
The Ghost in the assay tube: heterophil antibody interferences in immunoassays – an ever-recurring but often forgotten problem. Communiqué: A Mayo Reference Services Publication. 2003; 28(3):1–4.[1]
Larsson A, Mellstedt H (February 1992). "Chicken antibodies: a tool to avoid interference by human anti-mouse antibodies in ELISA after in vivo treatment with murine monoclonal antibodies". Hybridoma. 11 (1): 33–9. doi:10.1089/hyb.1992.11.33. PMID1737638.
Bolstad N, Warren DJ, Nustad K (October 2013). "Heterophilic antibody interference in immunometric assays". Best Practice & Research. Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 27 (5): 647–61. doi:10.1016/j.beem.2013.05.011. hdl:10852/72708. PMID24094636.