Highest averages method (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Highest averages method" in English language version.

Last modified: 11:03:47, 25 August 2026 (UTC)

Ref.Un. Ref.Website

Global rank English rank

7225doi.org

2^nd place

1911worldcat.org

4^th place

141archive.org

6^th place

1310web.archive.org

1^st place

113nih.gov

5^th place

62adsabs.harvard.edu

14^th place

9^th place

53jstor.org

23^rd place

15^th place

53semanticscholar.org

15^th place

8^th place

42tcd.ie

4,927^th place

3,031^st place

21cambridge.org

209^th place

151^st place

21bundeswahlleiter.de

5,479^th place

6,719^th place

11acm.org

1,200^th place

821^st place

11degruyter.com

927^th place

757^th place

11dsaj.gov.mo

low place

11maa.org

4,358^th place

2,907^th place

11europa.eu

62^nd place

100^th place

11numdam.org

8,359^th place

6,894^th place

11essex.ac.uk

low place

6,858^th place

11elsevier.com

365^th place

372^nd place

11thedanishparliament.dk

low place

11sciencedirect.com

137^th place

146^th place

11tandfonline.com

286^th place

209^th place

11nevo.co.il

8,217^th place

low place

acm.org (Global: 1,200^th place; English: 821^st place)

dl.acm.org

Ricca, Federica; Scozzari, Andrea; Serafini, Paola (2017). "A Guided Tour of the Mathematics of Seat Allocation and Political Districting". In Endriss, Ulle (ed.). Trends in Computational Social Choice. Lulu.com. pp. 49–68. ISBN 978-1-326-91209-3. Archived from the original on 2024-10-08. Retrieved 2024-10-08.

adsabs.harvard.edu (Global: 14^th place; English: 9^th place)

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

Balinski, M. L.; Young, H. P. (January 1980). "The Webster method of apportionment". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 77 (1): 1–4. Bibcode:1980PNAS...77....1B. doi:10.1073/pnas.77.1.1. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 348194. PMID 16592744.
Huntington, Edward V. (1929). "The Report of the National Academy of Sciences on Reapportionment". Science. 69 (1792): 471–473. Bibcode:1929Sci....69..471H. doi:10.1126/science.69.1792.471. ISSN 0036-8075. JSTOR 1653304. PMID 17750282.

archive.org (Global: 6^th place; English: 6^th place)

Balinski, Michel L.; Young, H. Peyton (1982). Fair Representation: Meeting the Ideal of One Man, One Vote. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN 0-300-02724-9.

bundeswahlleiter.de (Global: 5,479^th place; English: 6,719^th place)

"Sainte-Laguë/Schepers". The Federal Returning Officer of Germany. Retrieved 28 August 2021.

cambridge.org (Global: 209^th place; English: 151^st place)

Argersinger, Peter H., ed. (2012), ""Injustices and Inequalities": The Politics of Apportionment, 1870–1888", Representation and Inequality in Late Nineteenth-Century America: The Politics of Apportionment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 8–41, doi:10.1017/cbo9781139149402.002, ISBN 978-1-139-14940-2, archived from the original on 2018-06-07, retrieved 2024-08-04, Apportionment not only determined the power of different states in Congress but, because it allocated electors as well, directly affected the election of the president. Indeed, the peculiar apportionment of 1872, adopted in violation of the prevailing law mandating the method of allocating seats, was directly responsible for the 1876 election of Rutherford B. Hayes with a popular vote minority. Had the previous method been followed, even the Electoral Commission would have been unable to place Hayes in the White House.

degruyter.com (Global: 927^th place; English: 757^th place)

Dančišin, Vladimír (2017-01-01). "No-show paradox in Slovak party-list proportional system". Human Affairs. 27 (1): 15–21. doi:10.1515/humaff-2017-0002. ISSN 1337-401X.

doi.org (Global: 2^nd place; English: 2^nd place)

doi.org

Pukelsheim, Friedrich (2017). "Divisor Methods of Apportionment: Divide and Round". Proportional Representation: Apportionment Methods and Their Applications. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 71–93. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64707-4_4. ISBN 978-3-319-64707-4. Retrieved 2021-09-01.
Pukelsheim, Friedrich (2017). "From Reals to Integers: Rounding Functions, Rounding Rules". Proportional Representation: Apportionment Methods and Their Applications. Springer International Publishing. pp. 59–70. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64707-4_3. ISBN 978-3-319-64707-4. Retrieved 2021-09-01.
Pukelsheim, Friedrich (2017). "Securing System Consistency: Coherence and Paradoxes". Proportional Representation: Apportionment Methods and Their Applications. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 159–183. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64707-4_9. ISBN 978-3-319-64707-4. Retrieved 2024-05-10.
Dančišin, Vladimír (2017-01-01). "No-show paradox in Slovak party-list proportional system". Human Affairs. 27 (1): 15–21. doi:10.1515/humaff-2017-0002. ISSN 1337-401X.
Pukelsheim, Friedrich (2017). "Exposing Methods: The 2014 European Parliament Elections". Proportional Representation: Apportionment Methods and Their Applications. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–40. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64707-4_1. ISBN 978-3-319-64707-4. Retrieved 2024-07-03.
Argersinger, Peter H., ed. (2012), ""Injustices and Inequalities": The Politics of Apportionment, 1870–1888", Representation and Inequality in Late Nineteenth-Century America: The Politics of Apportionment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 8–41, doi:10.1017/cbo9781139149402.002, ISBN 978-1-139-14940-2, archived from the original on 2018-06-07, retrieved 2024-08-04, Apportionment not only determined the power of different states in Congress but, because it allocated electors as well, directly affected the election of the president. Indeed, the peculiar apportionment of 1872, adopted in violation of the prevailing law mandating the method of allocating seats, was directly responsible for the 1876 election of Rutherford B. Hayes with a popular vote minority. Had the previous method been followed, even the Electoral Commission would have been unable to place Hayes in the White House.
Caulfield, Michael J. (2012). "What If? How Apportionment Methods Choose Our Presidents". The Mathematics Teacher. 106 (3): 178–183. doi:10.5951/mathteacher.106.3.0178. ISSN 0025-5769. JSTOR 10.5951/mathteacher.106.3.0178.
Pukelsheim, Friedrich (2017). "Targeting the House Size: Discrepancy Distribution". Proportional Representation: Apportionment Methods and Their Applications. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 107–125. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64707-4_6. ISBN 978-3-319-64707-4. Retrieved 2024-05-10.
Gallagher, Michael (1991). "Proportionality, disproportionality and electoral systems" (PDF). Electoral Studies. 10 (1): 33–51. doi:10.1016/0261-3794(91)90004-C. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-04.
Gallagher, Michael (1992). "Comparing Proportional Representation Electoral Systems: Quotas, Thresholds, Paradoxes and Majorities" (PDF). British Journal of Political Science. 22 (4): 469–496. doi:10.1017/S0007123400006499. ISSN 0007-1234. S2CID 153414497.
Ichimori, Tetsuo (2010). "New apportionment methods and their quota property". JSIAM Letters. 2: 33–36. doi:10.14495/jsiaml.2.33. ISSN 1883-0617.
Pennisi, Aline (March 1998). "Disproportionality indexes and robustness of proportional allocation methods". Electoral Studies. 17 (1): 3–19. doi:10.1016/S0261-3794(97)00052-8. Archived from the original on 2024-04-24. Retrieved 2024-05-10.
Balinski, M. L.; Young, H. P. (January 1980). "The Webster method of apportionment". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 77 (1): 1–4. Bibcode:1980PNAS...77....1B. doi:10.1073/pnas.77.1.1. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 348194. PMID 16592744.
Pukelsheim, Friedrich (2017). "Favoring Some at the Expense of Others: Seat Biases". Proportional Representation: Apportionment Methods and Their Applications. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 127–147. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64707-4_7. ISBN 978-3-319-64707-4. Retrieved 2024-05-10.
Pukelsheim, Friedrich (2017). "Tracing Peculiarities: Vote Thresholds and Majority Clauses". Proportional Representation: Apportionment Methods and Their Applications. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 207–223. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64707-4_11. ISBN 978-3-319-64707-4. Retrieved 2024-05-10.
Pukelsheim, Friedrich (2017). "Truncating Seat Ranges: Minimum-Maximum Restrictions". Proportional Representation: Apportionment Methods and Their Applications. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 225–245. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64707-4_12. ISBN 978-3-319-64707-4. Retrieved 2024-05-10.
Ernst, Lawrence R. (1994). "Apportionment Methods for the House of Representatives and the Court Challenges". Management Science. 40 (10): 1207–1227. doi:10.1287/mnsc.40.10.1207. ISSN 0025-1909. JSTOR 2661618. Archived from the original on 2024-05-10. Retrieved 2024-02-10.
Huntington, Edward V. (1929). "The Report of the National Academy of Sciences on Reapportionment". Science. 69 (1792): 471–473. Bibcode:1929Sci....69..471H. doi:10.1126/science.69.1792.471. ISSN 0036-8075. JSTOR 1653304. PMID 17750282.
Pukelsheim, Friedrich (2017). "Quota Methods of Apportionment: Divide and Rank". Proportional Representation: Apportionment Methods and Their Applications. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 95–105. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64707-4_5. ISBN 978-3-319-64707-4. Retrieved 2024-05-10.
Pukelsheim, Friedrich (2017). "From Reals to Integers: Rounding Functions and Rounding Rules". Proportional Representation: Apportionment Methods and Their Applications. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 59–70. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64707-4_3. ISBN 978-3-319-64707-4. Retrieved 2021-09-01.
Lauwers, Luc; Van Puyenbroeck, Tom (2008). "Minimally Disproportional Representation: Generalized Entropy and Stolarsky Mean-Divisor Methods of Apportionment". SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1304628. ISSN 1556-5068. S2CID 124797897.
Wada, Junichiro (2012-05-01). "A divisor apportionment method based on the Kolm–Atkinson social welfare function and generalized entropy". Mathematical Social Sciences. 63 (3): 243–247. doi:10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2012.02.002. ISSN 0165-4896.
Agnew, Robert A. (April 2008). "Optimal Congressional Apportionment". The American Mathematical Monthly. 115 (4): 297–303. doi:10.1080/00029890.2008.11920530. ISSN 0002-9890. S2CID 14596741.
Balinski, M. L.; Young, H. P. (1975-08-01). "The Quota Method of Apportionment". The American Mathematical Monthly. 82 (7): 701–730. doi:10.1080/00029890.1975.11993911. ISSN 0002-9890.

dx.doi.org

Lauwers, Luc; Van Puyenbroeck, Tom (2008). "Minimally Disproportional Representation: Generalized Entropy and Stolarsky Mean-Divisor Methods of Apportionment". SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1304628. ISSN 1556-5068. S2CID 124797897.

dsaj.gov.mo (Global: low place; English: low place)

bo.dsaj.gov.mo

Electoral law of Macau, Article 17(2): "O número de votos obtido por cada candidatura é dividido sucessivamente por 1, 2, 4, 8 e demais potências de 2, até ao número de mandatos a distribuir..."

elsevier.com (Global: 365^th place; English: 372^nd place)

linkinghub.elsevier.com

Pennisi, Aline (March 1998). "Disproportionality indexes and robustness of proportional allocation methods". Electoral Studies. 17 (1): 3–19. doi:10.1016/S0261-3794(97)00052-8. Archived from the original on 2024-04-24. Retrieved 2024-05-10.

essex.ac.uk (Global: low place; English: 6,858^th place)

Pukelsheim, Friedrich (2007). "Seat bias formulas in proportional representation systems" (PDF). 4th ECPR General Conference. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 February 2009.

europa.eu (Global: 62^nd place; English: 100^th place)

europarl.europa.eu

The allocation between the EU Member States of the seats in the European Parliament (PDF) (Report). European Parliament. 2011. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2024-05-12. Retrieved 2024-01-26.

jstor.org (Global: 23^rd place; English: 15^th place)

Caulfield, Michael J. (2012). "What If? How Apportionment Methods Choose Our Presidents". The Mathematics Teacher. 106 (3): 178–183. doi:10.5951/mathteacher.106.3.0178. ISSN 0025-5769. JSTOR 10.5951/mathteacher.106.3.0178.
Ernst, Lawrence R. (1994). "Apportionment Methods for the House of Representatives and the Court Challenges". Management Science. 40 (10): 1207–1227. doi:10.1287/mnsc.40.10.1207. ISSN 0025-1909. JSTOR 2661618. Archived from the original on 2024-05-10. Retrieved 2024-02-10.
Huntington, Edward V. (1929). "The Report of the National Academy of Sciences on Reapportionment". Science. 69 (1792): 471–473. Bibcode:1929Sci....69..471H. doi:10.1126/science.69.1792.471. ISSN 0036-8075. JSTOR 1653304. PMID 17750282.

maa.org (Global: 4,358^th place; English: 2,907^th place)

"Apportioning Representatives in the United States Congress - Adams' Method of Apportionment | Mathematical Association of America". www.maa.org. Archived from the original on 9 June 2024.

nevo.co.il (Global: 8,217^th place; English: low place)

https://www.nevo.co.il/law_html/law01/190_026.htm#Seif126

nih.gov (Global: 5^th place; English: 5^th place)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Balinski, M. L.; Young, H. P. (January 1980). "The Webster method of apportionment". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 77 (1): 1–4. Bibcode:1980PNAS...77....1B. doi:10.1073/pnas.77.1.1. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 348194. PMID 16592744.
Huntington, Edward V. (1929). "The Report of the National Academy of Sciences on Reapportionment". Science. 69 (1792): 471–473. Bibcode:1929Sci....69..471H. doi:10.1126/science.69.1792.471. ISSN 0036-8075. JSTOR 1653304. PMID 17750282.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Balinski, M. L.; Young, H. P. (January 1980). "The Webster method of apportionment". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 77 (1): 1–4. Bibcode:1980PNAS...77....1B. doi:10.1073/pnas.77.1.1. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 348194. PMID 16592744.

numdam.org (Global: 8,359^th place; English: 6,894^th place)

Sainte-Laguë, André. "La représentation proportionnelle et la méthode des moindres carrés." Archived 2024-05-15 at the Wayback Machine Annales scientifiques de l'école Normale Supérieure. Vol. 27. 1910.

sciencedirect.com (Global: 137^th place; English: 146^th place)

Wada, Junichiro (2012-05-01). "A divisor apportionment method based on the Kolm–Atkinson social welfare function and generalized entropy". Mathematical Social Sciences. 63 (3): 243–247. doi:10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2012.02.002. ISSN 0165-4896.

semanticscholar.org (Global: 15^th place; English: 8^th place)

api.semanticscholar.org

Gallagher, Michael (1992). "Comparing Proportional Representation Electoral Systems: Quotas, Thresholds, Paradoxes and Majorities" (PDF). British Journal of Political Science. 22 (4): 469–496. doi:10.1017/S0007123400006499. ISSN 0007-1234. S2CID 153414497.
Lauwers, Luc; Van Puyenbroeck, Tom (2008). "Minimally Disproportional Representation: Generalized Entropy and Stolarsky Mean-Divisor Methods of Apportionment". SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1304628. ISSN 1556-5068. S2CID 124797897.
Agnew, Robert A. (April 2008). "Optimal Congressional Apportionment". The American Mathematical Monthly. 115 (4): 297–303. doi:10.1080/00029890.2008.11920530. ISSN 0002-9890. S2CID 14596741.

tandfonline.com (Global: 286^th place; English: 209^th place)

Agnew, Robert A. (April 2008). "Optimal Congressional Apportionment". The American Mathematical Monthly. 115 (4): 297–303. doi:10.1080/00029890.2008.11920530. ISSN 0002-9890. S2CID 14596741.

tcd.ie (Global: 4,927^th place; English: 3,031^st place)

Gallagher, Michael (1991). "Proportionality, disproportionality and electoral systems" (PDF). Electoral Studies. 10 (1): 33–51. doi:10.1016/0261-3794(91)90004-C. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-04.
Gallagher, Michael (1992). "Comparing Proportional Representation Electoral Systems: Quotas, Thresholds, Paradoxes and Majorities" (PDF). British Journal of Political Science. 22 (4): 469–496. doi:10.1017/S0007123400006499. ISSN 0007-1234. S2CID 153414497.

thedanishparliament.dk (Global: low place; English: low place)

"The Parliamentary Electoral System in Denmark". Archived from the original on 2016-08-28.

web.archive.org (Global: 1^st place; English: 1^st place)

Ricca, Federica; Scozzari, Andrea; Serafini, Paola (2017). "A Guided Tour of the Mathematics of Seat Allocation and Political Districting". In Endriss, Ulle (ed.). Trends in Computational Social Choice. Lulu.com. pp. 49–68. ISBN 978-1-326-91209-3. Archived from the original on 2024-10-08. Retrieved 2024-10-08.
Argersinger, Peter H., ed. (2012), ""Injustices and Inequalities": The Politics of Apportionment, 1870–1888", Representation and Inequality in Late Nineteenth-Century America: The Politics of Apportionment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 8–41, doi:10.1017/cbo9781139149402.002, ISBN 978-1-139-14940-2, archived from the original on 2018-06-07, retrieved 2024-08-04, Apportionment not only determined the power of different states in Congress but, because it allocated electors as well, directly affected the election of the president. Indeed, the peculiar apportionment of 1872, adopted in violation of the prevailing law mandating the method of allocating seats, was directly responsible for the 1876 election of Rutherford B. Hayes with a popular vote minority. Had the previous method been followed, even the Electoral Commission would have been unable to place Hayes in the White House.
Gallagher, Michael (1991). "Proportionality, disproportionality and electoral systems" (PDF). Electoral Studies. 10 (1): 33–51. doi:10.1016/0261-3794(91)90004-C. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-03-04.
"Apportioning Representatives in the United States Congress - Adams' Method of Apportionment | Mathematical Association of America". www.maa.org. Archived from the original on 9 June 2024.
The allocation between the EU Member States of the seats in the European Parliament (PDF) (Report). European Parliament. 2011. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2024-05-12. Retrieved 2024-01-26.
Sainte-Laguë, André. "La représentation proportionnelle et la méthode des moindres carrés." Archived 2024-05-15 at the Wayback Machine Annales scientifiques de l'école Normale Supérieure. Vol. 27. 1910.
Pukelsheim, Friedrich (2007). "Seat bias formulas in proportional representation systems" (PDF). 4th ECPR General Conference. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 February 2009.
Pennisi, Aline (March 1998). "Disproportionality indexes and robustness of proportional allocation methods". Electoral Studies. 17 (1): 3–19. doi:10.1016/S0261-3794(97)00052-8. Archived from the original on 2024-04-24. Retrieved 2024-05-10.
Ernst, Lawrence R. (1994). "Apportionment Methods for the House of Representatives and the Court Challenges". Management Science. 40 (10): 1207–1227. doi:10.1287/mnsc.40.10.1207. ISSN 0025-1909. JSTOR 2661618. Archived from the original on 2024-05-10. Retrieved 2024-02-10.
"The Parliamentary Electoral System in Denmark". Archived from the original on 2016-08-28.

worldcat.org (Global: 4^th place; English: 4^th place)

search.worldcat.org

Dančišin, Vladimír (2017-01-01). "No-show paradox in Slovak party-list proportional system". Human Affairs. 27 (1): 15–21. doi:10.1515/humaff-2017-0002. ISSN 1337-401X.
Caulfield, Michael J. (2012). "What If? How Apportionment Methods Choose Our Presidents". The Mathematics Teacher. 106 (3): 178–183. doi:10.5951/mathteacher.106.3.0178. ISSN 0025-5769. JSTOR 10.5951/mathteacher.106.3.0178.
Gallagher, Michael (1992). "Comparing Proportional Representation Electoral Systems: Quotas, Thresholds, Paradoxes and Majorities" (PDF). British Journal of Political Science. 22 (4): 469–496. doi:10.1017/S0007123400006499. ISSN 0007-1234. S2CID 153414497.
Ichimori, Tetsuo (2010). "New apportionment methods and their quota property". JSIAM Letters. 2: 33–36. doi:10.14495/jsiaml.2.33. ISSN 1883-0617.
Balinski, M. L.; Young, H. P. (January 1980). "The Webster method of apportionment". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 77 (1): 1–4. Bibcode:1980PNAS...77....1B. doi:10.1073/pnas.77.1.1. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 348194. PMID 16592744.
Ernst, Lawrence R. (1994). "Apportionment Methods for the House of Representatives and the Court Challenges". Management Science. 40 (10): 1207–1227. doi:10.1287/mnsc.40.10.1207. ISSN 0025-1909. JSTOR 2661618. Archived from the original on 2024-05-10. Retrieved 2024-02-10.
Huntington, Edward V. (1929). "The Report of the National Academy of Sciences on Reapportionment". Science. 69 (1792): 471–473. Bibcode:1929Sci....69..471H. doi:10.1126/science.69.1792.471. ISSN 0036-8075. JSTOR 1653304. PMID 17750282.
Lauwers, Luc; Van Puyenbroeck, Tom (2008). "Minimally Disproportional Representation: Generalized Entropy and Stolarsky Mean-Divisor Methods of Apportionment". SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1304628. ISSN 1556-5068. S2CID 124797897.
Wada, Junichiro (2012-05-01). "A divisor apportionment method based on the Kolm–Atkinson social welfare function and generalized entropy". Mathematical Social Sciences. 63 (3): 243–247. doi:10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2012.02.002. ISSN 0165-4896.
Agnew, Robert A. (April 2008). "Optimal Congressional Apportionment". The American Mathematical Monthly. 115 (4): 297–303. doi:10.1080/00029890.2008.11920530. ISSN 0002-9890. S2CID 14596741.
Balinski, M. L.; Young, H. P. (1975-08-01). "The Quota Method of Apportionment". The American Mathematical Monthly. 82 (7): 701–730. doi:10.1080/00029890.1975.11993911. ISSN 0002-9890.

Highest averages method (English Wikipedia)

acm.org (Global: 1,200th place; English: 821st place)

dl.acm.org

adsabs.harvard.edu (Global: 14th place; English: 9th place)

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

archive.org (Global: 6th place; English: 6th place)

bundeswahlleiter.de (Global: 5,479th place; English: 6,719th place)

cambridge.org (Global: 209th place; English: 151st place)

degruyter.com (Global: 927th place; English: 757th place)

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; English: 2nd place)

doi.org

dx.doi.org

dsaj.gov.mo (Global: low place; English: low place)

bo.dsaj.gov.mo

elsevier.com (Global: 365th place; English: 372nd place)

linkinghub.elsevier.com

essex.ac.uk (Global: low place; English: 6,858th place)

europa.eu (Global: 62nd place; English: 100th place)

europarl.europa.eu

jstor.org (Global: 23rd place; English: 15th place)

maa.org (Global: 4,358th place; English: 2,907th place)

nevo.co.il (Global: 8,217th place; English: low place)

nih.gov (Global: 5th place; English: 5th place)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

numdam.org (Global: 8,359th place; English: 6,894th place)

sciencedirect.com (Global: 137th place; English: 146th place)

semanticscholar.org (Global: 15th place; English: 8th place)

api.semanticscholar.org

tandfonline.com (Global: 286th place; English: 209th place)

tcd.ie (Global: 4,927th place; English: 3,031st place)

thedanishparliament.dk (Global: low place; English: low place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; English: 1st place)

worldcat.org (Global: 4th place; English: 4th place)

search.worldcat.org

acm.org (Global: 1,200^th place; English: 821^st place)

adsabs.harvard.edu (Global: 14^th place; English: 9^th place)

archive.org (Global: 6^th place; English: 6^th place)

bundeswahlleiter.de (Global: 5,479^th place; English: 6,719^th place)

cambridge.org (Global: 209^th place; English: 151^st place)

degruyter.com (Global: 927^th place; English: 757^th place)

doi.org (Global: 2^nd place; English: 2^nd place)

elsevier.com (Global: 365^th place; English: 372^nd place)

essex.ac.uk (Global: low place; English: 6,858^th place)

europa.eu (Global: 62^nd place; English: 100^th place)

jstor.org (Global: 23^rd place; English: 15^th place)

maa.org (Global: 4,358^th place; English: 2,907^th place)

nevo.co.il (Global: 8,217^th place; English: low place)

nih.gov (Global: 5^th place; English: 5^th place)

numdam.org (Global: 8,359^th place; English: 6,894^th place)

sciencedirect.com (Global: 137^th place; English: 146^th place)

semanticscholar.org (Global: 15^th place; English: 8^th place)

tandfonline.com (Global: 286^th place; English: 209^th place)

tcd.ie (Global: 4,927^th place; English: 3,031^st place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1^st place; English: 1^st place)

worldcat.org (Global: 4^th place; English: 4^th place)