History of human thought (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "History of human thought" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
3rd place
3rd place
5th place
5th place
1st place
1st place
2nd place
2nd place
40th place
58th place
6th place
6th place
179th place
183rd place
11th place
8th place
26th place
20th place
4th place
4th place
8th place
10th place
507th place
429th place
low place
low place
1,379th place
1,175th place
low place
7,508th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
7,357th place
8,049th place
low place
low place
1,953rd place
1,522nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,194th place
1,001st place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
305th place
264th place
low place
low place
1,077th place
761st place
1,201st place
770th place
710th place
648th place
2,334th place
1,403rd place

africanmag.com

ahdictionary.com

  • "postmodernism". American Heritage Dictionary. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. 2019. Archived from the original on 15 June 2018. Retrieved 5 May 2019 – via AHDictionary.com. Of or relating to an intellectual stance often marked by eclecticism and irony and tending to reject the universal validity of such principles as hierarchy, binary opposition, categorization, and stable identity.

arabamerica.com

archive.org

bbc.co.uk

books.google.com

britannica.com

  • "Chinese philosophy", Encyclopædia Britannica, accessed 4/6/2014
  • "Zou Yan". Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved 1 March 2011.
  • Nyaya: Indian Philosophy Encyclopædia Britannica (2014)
  • Mimamsa Encyclopædia Britannica (2014)
  • "dravya – Jainism". Encyclopædia Britannica.
  • [a] Anatta, Encyclopædia Britannica (2013), Quote: "Anatta in Buddhism, the doctrine that there is in humans no permanent, underlying soul. The concept of anatta, or anatman, is a departure from the Hindu belief in atman ("the self")."; [b] Steven Collins (1994), Religion and Practical Reason (Editors: Frank Reynolds, David Tracy), State Univ of New York Press, ISBN 978-0791422175, page 64; "Central to Buddhist soteriology is the doctrine of not-self (Pali: anattā, Sanskrit: anātman, the opposed doctrine of ātman is central to Brahmanical thought). Put very briefly, this is the [Buddhist] doctrine that human beings have no soul, no self, no unchanging essence."; [c] John C. Plott et al (2000), Global History of Philosophy: The Axial Age, Volume 1, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-8120801585, page 63, Quote: "The Buddhist schools reject any Ātman concept. As we have already observed, this is the basic and ineradicable distinction between Hinduism and Buddhism"; [d] Katie Javanaud (2013), Is The Buddhist 'No-Self' Doctrine Compatible With Pursuing Nirvana?, Philosophy Now; [e] David Loy (1982), Enlightenment in Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta: Are Nirvana and Moksha the Same?, International Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 23, Issue 1, pages 65-74
  • Duignan, Brian. "Postmodernism". Britannica.com. Retrieved 24 April 2016.

cambridge.org

carvaka4india.com

countrystudies.us

doi.org

earlychristianhistory.info

history-science-technology.com

  • Hassan, Ahmad Y (1996). "Factors Behind the Decline of Islamic Science After the Sixteenth Century". In Sharifah Shifa Al-Attas (ed.). Islam and the Challenge of Modernity, Proceedings of the Inaugural Symposium on Islam and the Challenge of Modernity: Historical and Contemporary Contexts, Kuala Lumpur, August 1–5, 1994. International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization (ISTAC). pp. 351–99. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015.

hkbu.edu.hk

arts.hkbu.edu.hk

jstor.org

nationalinterest.org

nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

oxforddictionaries.com

pagetour.org

philosophynow.org

  • [a] Anatta, Encyclopædia Britannica (2013), Quote: "Anatta in Buddhism, the doctrine that there is in humans no permanent, underlying soul. The concept of anatta, or anatman, is a departure from the Hindu belief in atman ("the self")."; [b] Steven Collins (1994), Religion and Practical Reason (Editors: Frank Reynolds, David Tracy), State Univ of New York Press, ISBN 978-0791422175, page 64; "Central to Buddhist soteriology is the doctrine of not-self (Pali: anattā, Sanskrit: anātman, the opposed doctrine of ātman is central to Brahmanical thought). Put very briefly, this is the [Buddhist] doctrine that human beings have no soul, no self, no unchanging essence."; [c] John C. Plott et al (2000), Global History of Philosophy: The Axial Age, Volume 1, Motilal Banarsidass, ISBN 978-8120801585, page 63, Quote: "The Buddhist schools reject any Ātman concept. As we have already observed, this is the basic and ineradicable distinction between Hinduism and Buddhism"; [d] Katie Javanaud (2013), Is The Buddhist 'No-Self' Doctrine Compatible With Pursuing Nirvana?, Philosophy Now; [e] David Loy (1982), Enlightenment in Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta: Are Nirvana and Moksha the Same?, International Philosophical Quarterly, Volume 23, Issue 1, pages 65-74

philtar.ac.uk

publishinghau5.com

questia.com

religioustolerance.org

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

stanford.edu

plato.stanford.edu

sufianoorbakhshia.org

tandfonline.com

  • "Global Intellectual History". www.tandfonline.com. Retrieved 2019-06-20.

usc.edu

today.usc.edu

utm.edu

iep.utm.edu

web.archive.org

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

yabahu.com

zikr.co.uk