Holocene extinction (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Holocene extinction" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
2nd place
2nd place
1st place
1st place
4th place
4th place
18th place
17th place
11th place
8th place
5th place
5th place
12th place
11th place
102nd place
76th place
28th place
26th place
20th place
30th place
149th place
178th place
7th place
7th place
1,160th place
737th place
26th place
20th place
222nd place
297th place
234th place
397th place
3rd place
3rd place
1,306th place
885th place
476th place
282nd place
485th place
440th place
120th place
125th place
low place
low place
36th place
33rd place
88th place
160th place
610th place
704th place
6th place
6th place
269th place
201st place
2,041st place
1,331st place
low place
low place
305th place
264th place
228th place
158th place
32nd place
21st place
108th place
80th place
207th place
136th place
268th place
215th place
928th place
651st place
3,430th place
3,114th place
731st place
638th place
75th place
83rd place
896th place
674th place
4,246th place
2,804th place
204th place
353rd place
2,953rd place
1,823rd place
3,633rd place
3,091st place
1,982nd place
1,603rd place
507th place
429th place
low place
low place
8,222nd place
8,022nd place
1,435th place
802nd place
6,094th place
4,186th place
140th place
115th place
low place
low place
1,283rd place
1,130th place
97th place
164th place
1,877th place
1,129th place
1,808th place
1,159th place
456th place
300th place
1,010th place
612th place
369th place
616th place
1,031st place
879th place
low place
low place
2,660th place
2,078th place
2,562nd place
3,215th place
low place
low place
7,547th place
low place
49th place
47th place
5,534th place
4,538th place
2,007th place
1,298th place
low place
8,948th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
388th place
265th place
41st place
34th place
109th place
87th place
6,897th place
6,705th place
9,065th place
7,557th place
34th place
27th place
1,190th place
959th place
574th place
425th place
30th place
24th place
344th place
296th place
6,554th place
5,474th place
3,100th place
2,591st place
290th place
202nd place
92nd place
72nd place
1,613th place
3,265th place
433rd place
284th place
38th place
40th place
68th place
117th place
low place
low place
2,523rd place
1,574th place
774th place
716th place
low place
low place
3,624th place
3,031st place
472nd place
340th place
4,168th place
2,512th place
2,263rd place
1,687th place
low place
low place
6,938th place
4,456th place
993rd place
920th place
6,834th place
4,564th place
274th place
309th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
7,856th place
low place
low place
146th place
110th place
129th place
89th place

3news.co.nz

aaas.org

atlas.aaas.org

academie-sciences.fr

comptes-rendus.academie-sciences.fr

aljazeera.com

apnews.com

archive.org

archives-ouvertes.fr

hal.archives-ouvertes.fr

arstechnica.com

au.dk

pure.au.dk

australiangeographic.com.au

bbc.com

bioone.org

books.google.com

businessinsider.com

  • Woodward, Aylin (April 8, 2019). "So many animals are going extinct that it could take Earth 10 million years to recover". Business Insider. Archived from the original on October 8, 2019. Retrieved April 9, 2019. Lowery doesn't think we've strayed into Sixth Extinction territory yet. But he and Fraass agree that squabbling over what constitutes that distinction is beside the point. "We have to work to save biodiversity before it's gone. That's the important takeaway here," Lowery said. There is consensus on one aspect of the extinction trend, however: Homo sapiens are to blame. According to a 2014 study, current extinction rates are 1,000 times higher than they would be if humans weren't around.

cambridge.org

cbd.int

cbsnews.com

cnn.com

confex.com

isaconf.confex.com

creativecommons.org

doi.org

doi.org

dx.doi.org

dw.com

elsevier.com

linkinghub.elsevier.com

esquire.com

europa.eu

europarl.europa.eu

fortune.com

fraw.org.uk

gale.com

go.gale.com

ghostarchive.org

handle.net

hdl.handle.net

harvard.edu

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

arp.harvard.edu

hawaiiconservation.org

huffingtonpost.com

igbp.net

independent.co.uk

ipbes.net

iucn.org

iucnredlist.org

iugs.org

jcu.edu.au

researchonline.jcu.edu.au

jstor.org

livescience.com

mysterium.com

nasa.gov

climate.nasa.gov

earthobservatory.nasa.gov

nationalgeographic.com

nationalgeographic.org

education.nationalgeographic.org

  • National Geographic Society (June 7, 2019). "Anthropocene". National Geographic. Archived from the original on 31 May 2022. Retrieved 23 November 2021. coined and made popular by biologist Eugene Stormer and chemist Paul Crutzen in 2000.

nature.com

newscientist.com

newsweek.com

newyorker.com

nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

npr.org

nytimes.com

nytimes.com

green.blogs.nytimes.com

oceanconservancy.org

orbooks.com

oregonstate.edu

scientistswarning.forestry.oregonstate.edu

ornl.gov

esd.ornl.gov

oup.com

academic.oup.com

global.oup.com

ourworldindata.org

phys.org

popularmechanics.com

psu.edu

citeseerx.ist.psu.edu

publishing.service.gov.uk

assets.publishing.service.gov.uk

researchgate.net

reuters.com

royalholloway.ac.uk

pure.royalholloway.ac.uk

sagepub.com

journals.sagepub.com

salon.com

science.org

sciencedaily.com

sciencedirect.com

scientificamerican.com

blogs.scientificamerican.com

scientificamerican.com

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

skeptic.com

  • Boslough, Mark (March 2023). "Apocalypse!". Skeptic Magazine. 28 (1): 51–59. Archived from the original on 2023-11-27. Retrieved 2023-06-19.

soltechdesigns.com

sustainable.soltechdesigns.com

springer.com

link.springer.com

squarespace.com

static.squarespace.com

stratigraphy.org

quaternary.stratigraphy.org

tandfonline.com

telegraph.co.uk

theatlantic.com

theconversation.com

thegreatstory.org

theguardian.com

thehill.com

theintercept.com

  • Ketcham, Christopher (December 3, 2022). "Addressing Climate Change Will Not "Save the Planet"". The Intercept. Archived from the original on February 18, 2024. Retrieved December 6, 2022. When it comes to effects on wildlife, climate change is more like a mule, slow and plodding. Yes, a warmed atmosphere is projected to be a significant factor in the extinction crisis in future decades, but what's destroying species today is habitat fragmentation and loss, overhunting and overexploitation, agricultural expansion, pollution, and industrial development. It isn't climate change that caused a 69 percent loss in total wildlife populations between 1970 and 2018, according to a World Wildlife Fund study published this year. The cause is too many people demanding too much from ecosystems, or human overshoot of the biophysical carrying capacity of the Earth.

thestar.com.my

ucl.ac.uk

discovery.ucl.ac.uk

ucm.es

eprints.ucm.es

ucpress.edu

online.ucpress.edu

ufpb.br

dse.ufpb.br

un.org

news.un.org

undp.org

hdr.undp.org

unep.org

unige.ch

archive-ouverte.unige.ch

unm.edu

biology.unm.edu

uow.edu.au

upi.com

usatoday.com

uv.mx

uzh.ch

zora.uzh.ch

waikato.ac.nz

researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz

washingtonpost.com

web.archive.org

wiley.com

onlinelibrary.wiley.com

bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

worldcat.org

worldwildlife.org

yahoo.com

news.yahoo.com