Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Homo floresiensis" in English language version.
the data we currently have for H. floresiensis are unable to distinguish among the various 'hobbits are early hominins' hypotheses
Support for most clades in all analyses was rather low as measured by traditional methods (bootstrap and Bremer support in parsimony, posterior probability in Bayesian inference)
Support for most clades in all analyses was rather low as measured by traditional methods (bootstrap and Bremer support in parsimony, posterior probability in Bayesian inference)
the data we currently have for H. floresiensis are unable to distinguish among the various 'hobbits are early hominins' hypotheses
Support for most clades in all analyses was rather low as measured by traditional methods (bootstrap and Bremer support in parsimony, posterior probability in Bayesian inference)
the data we currently have for H. floresiensis are unable to distinguish among the various 'hobbits are early hominins' hypotheses