Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Human rights in Tuvalu" in English language version.
Teitiota v Chief Executive of the Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment [2013] NZHC 3125 (26 November 2013) Priestley J. stated "The attempt to expand dramatically the scope of the Refugee Convention and particularly Article 1A(2) is impermissible. The optimism and novelty of the applicant's claim do not, in the context of well-settled law and the current concerns of the international community, convert the unhappy position of the applicant and other inhabitants of Kiribati into points of law."
Teitiota v Chief Executive of the Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment [2013] NZHC 3125 (26 November 2013) Priestley J. stated "The attempt to expand dramatically the scope of the Refugee Convention and particularly Article 1A(2) is impermissible. The optimism and novelty of the applicant's claim do not, in the context of well-settled law and the current concerns of the international community, convert the unhappy position of the applicant and other inhabitants of Kiribati into points of law."