Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Ibrahim al-Kurani" in English language version.
Al-Kūrānī instead embraces the position of the radical Ḥanbalites like Ibn Taymiyyah, and claimed that accepting these ambiguous verses and apparently anthropomorphic descriptions of God without any allegorical interpretation is the true position, not only of the salaf, but even of Abū al Ḥasan al-Ashʿarī himself.
His means were the invocation and restoration of the Hanbali/Taymiyyan legacy and the re-introduction of it as the standard Islamic theological vision.
al-Kurani declared his adherence to the Salafi position.. he staged a powerful defense of Ibn Taymiyya and Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya and their theological views.
... al-Kurani's highliting of al-Ibana (to which he would refer directly in later works) and considering it the principal source of the Ash'ari theology, would subsequently lead him to a closer identification with the salafi-Hanbali position.
Al-Kūrānī instead embraces the position of the radical Ḥanbalites like Ibn Taymiyyah, and claimed that accepting these ambiguous verses and apparently anthropomorphic descriptions of God without any allegorical interpretation is the true position, not only of the salaf, but even of Abū al Ḥasan al-Ashʿarī himself.
Al-Kūrānī instead embraces the position of the radical Ḥanbalites like Ibn Taymiyyah, and claimed that accepting these ambiguous verses and apparently anthropomorphic descriptions of God without any allegorical interpretation is the true position, not only of the salaf, but even of Abū al Ḥasan al-Ashʿarī himself.
His means were the invocation and restoration of the Hanbali/Taymiyyan legacy and the re-introduction of it as the standard Islamic theological vision.
al-Kurani declared his adherence to the Salafi position.. he staged a powerful defense of Ibn Taymiyya and Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya and their theological views.
... al-Kurani's highliting of al-Ibana (to which he would refer directly in later works) and considering it the principal source of the Ash'ari theology, would subsequently lead him to a closer identification with the salafi-Hanbali position.
Al-Kūrānī instead embraces the position of the radical Ḥanbalites like Ibn Taymiyyah, and claimed that accepting these ambiguous verses and apparently anthropomorphic descriptions of God without any allegorical interpretation is the true position, not only of the salaf, but even of Abū al Ḥasan al-Ashʿarī himself.
Al-Kūrānī disagrees with later Ashʿarite allegorical interpretations of the ambiguous verses, nor was he satisfied with the attitude of tafwīḍ...
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)