Incorporation of the Bill of Rights (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Incorporation of the Bill of Rights" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

8web.archive.org

1^st place

4books.google.com

3^rd place

3archive.org

6^th place

3findlaw.com

1,478^th place

868^th place

2supremecourt.gov

3,811^th place

2,160^th place

2ssrn.com

703^rd place

501^st place

2cnn.com

28^th place

26^th place

2loc.gov

70^th place

63^rd place

1archives.gov

446^th place

308^th place

1fas.org

505^th place

410^th place

1crf-usa.org

low place

1encyclopedia.com

462^nd place

345^th place

1archive.today

14^th place

1cornell.edu

332^nd place

246^th place

1reason.com

2,186^th place

1,287^th place

1cato.org

4,789^th place

3,253^rd place

1scotusblog.com

7,147^th place

3,830^th place

1texaslawreview.org

low place

1unl.edu

1,708^th place

1,051^st place

1justia.com

696^th place

428^th place

1fofweb.com

low place

1phschool.com

low place

1fff.org

low place

1yale.edu

565^th place

460^th place

1fordham.edu

1,648^th place

1,137^th place

1billofrightsinstitute.org

low place

1gpo.gov

1,360^th place

845^th place

1nytimes.com

7^th place

archive.org

Curtis, Michael Kent (1994) [1986]. No State Shall Abridge (Second printing in paperback ed.). Duke University Press. pp. 5, 202. ISBN 0-8223-0599-2.
Curtis, Michael Kent (1994) [1986]. No State Shall Abridge (Second printing in paperback ed.). Duke University Press. p. 202. ISBN 0-8223-0599-2.
Justice Thomas, in a concurring opinion in Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow, expressed his view that Everson was wrongly decided and that incorporation of the Establishment Clause is not justified under the Constitution. See Nussbaum, Martha Craven (2008). Liberty of conscience: in defense of America's tradition of religious equality. Basic Books. pp. 105 et seq. and Chapter 4. ISBN 978-0-465-05164-9. Richard F. Duncan (2007). "JUSTICE THOMAS AND PARTIAL INCORPORATION OF THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE: HEREIN OF STRUCTURAL LIMITATIONS, LIBERTY INTERESTS, AND TAKING INCORPORATION SERIOUSLY" (PDF). Regent University Law Review. 20: 37–56. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 15, 2013.

archive.today

See, e.g., Gary Bugh (2023). Incorporation of the Bill of Rights: An Accounting of the Supreme Court’s Extension of Federal Civil Liberties to the States. New York: Peter Lang ISBN 9781433196317; Constitutional Rights Foundation discussion, giving summary, extensive WWW links and timeline; Encyclopedia.com Article;BYU Law Review Article

archives.gov

"The Charters of Freedom: The Bill of Rights". Washington D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration. Retrieved October 4, 2015.

billofrightsinstitute.org

"Bill of Rights Institute: Incorporation". Bill of Rights Center. Archived from the original on October 12, 2013. Retrieved October 11, 2013.

books.google.com

Jeffrey Jowell; Jonathan Cooper (2002). Understanding Human Rights Principles. Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing. p. 180. ISBN 9781847313157. Retrieved March 16, 2017.
Loveland, Ian (2002). "Chapter 18 - Human Rights I: Traditional Perspectives". Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, and Human Rights: A Critical Introduction (Seventh ed.). London: Oxford University Press. p. 559. ISBN 9780198709039. Retrieved March 16, 2017.
Jayawickrama, Nihal (2002). The Judicial Application of Human Rights Law: National, Regional and International Jurisprudence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 98. ISBN 9780521780421. Retrieved March 16, 2017.
Amar, Akhil Reed: The Bill of Rights: Creation and Reconstruction , Page 234. Yale University Press, 1998

cato.org

See Pilon, Roger. "Lawless Judges: Refocusing the Issue for Conservatives," Georgetown Journal of Law and Public Policy Volume II, page 21 (2000).

cnn.com

de Vogue, Ariana (April 20, 2020). "Supreme Court says unanimous jury verdicts required in state criminal trials for serious offenses". CNN. Retrieved April 20, 2020.
de Vogue, Ariane; Tatum, Sophie (February 20, 2019). "Now we know what Ruth Bader Ginsburg was doing". CNN. Archived from the original on February 28, 2019. Retrieved February 20, 2019.

cornell.edu

supct.law.cornell.edu

Adamson v. California, 332 U.S. 46, 92-118 (1947)

crf-usa.org

See, e.g., Gary Bugh (2023). Incorporation of the Bill of Rights: An Accounting of the Supreme Court’s Extension of Federal Civil Liberties to the States. New York: Peter Lang ISBN 9781433196317; Constitutional Rights Foundation discussion, giving summary, extensive WWW links and timeline; Encyclopedia.com Article;BYU Law Review Article

encyclopedia.com

See, e.g., Gary Bugh (2023). Incorporation of the Bill of Rights: An Accounting of the Supreme Court’s Extension of Federal Civil Liberties to the States. New York: Peter Lang ISBN 9781433196317; Constitutional Rights Foundation discussion, giving summary, extensive WWW links and timeline; Encyclopedia.com Article;BYU Law Review Article

fas.org

Chu, Vivian (September 21, 2009). "The Second Amendment and Incorporation: An Overview of Recent Appellate Cases" (PDF). Congressional Research Service. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 6, 2022. Retrieved October 13, 2017.

fff.org

Vance, Laurence M. (May 9, 2012). "Does the First Amendment Protect the Freedom of Association? The Future of Freedom Foundation". The Future of Freedom Foundation. Archived from the original on June 17, 2023.

findlaw.com

caselaw.lp.findlaw.com

Adamson v. California, 332 U.S. 46 (1947) (Black, J., dissenting).
Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. 36 (1873).

laws.findlaw.com

West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, Majority Opinion, item 3 (US 1943) ("The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections."), archived from the original.

fofweb.com

Gary Hartman; Roy M. Mersky; Cindy L. Tate (2004). "Landmark Supreme Court Cases: "Edwards v. South Carolina."". New York: Facts On File, Inc., 2004. American History Online. Retrieved August 15, 2013.

fordham.edu

ir.lawnet.fordham.edu

Robert L. Cord (1975). "Neo-Incorporation: The Burger Court and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment". Fordham Law Review. 44 (2): 215–230. Retrieved February 13, 2015.

gpo.gov

"The Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis, and Interpretation - 1992 Edition → Amendments to the Constitution → Seventh Amendment - Civil Trials". U.S. Government Printing Office. U.S. Government Printing Office. 1992. p. 1453. Retrieved July 4, 2013. The Amendment governs only courts which sit under the authority of the United States, including courts in the territories and the District of Columbia, and does not apply generally to state courts.

justia.com

supreme.justia.com

"Gitlow v. New York, 268 U.S. 652 (1925) at 268". Justia US Supreme Court Center. June 8, 1925. Retrieved August 2, 2020. For present purposes, we may and do assume that freedom of speech and of the press which are protected by the First Amendment from abridgment by Congress are among the fundamental personal rights and "liberties" protected by the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment from impairment by the States.

loc.gov

memory.loc.gov

Congressional Globe: Debates and Proceedings, 1833–1873

loc.gov

"Primary Documents in American History", Library of Congress

nytimes.com

Liptak, Adam (February 20, 2019). "Supreme Court Puts Limits on Police Power to Seize Private Property". The New York Times. Archived from the original on April 10, 2020. Retrieved February 20, 2019.

phschool.com

"Pearson Prentice Hall: Supreme Court Cases - Edwards v. South Carolina, 1963". Pearson Education, Inc. Pearson Education, Inc. Retrieved August 15, 2013.

reason.com

See Doherty, Brian. "Killing Slaughterhouse: Understanding the controversial 1873 decision at the center of the Supreme Court's upcoming gun rights fight," Reason Magazine Retrieved 2010-01-26.

scotusblog.com

Privileges or Immunities Clause alive again

ssrn.com

See Wildenthal, Bryan. "The Lost Compromise: Reassessing the Early Understanding in Court and Congress on Incorporation of the Bill of Rights in the Fourteenth Amendment". Ohio State Law Journal, Vol. 61 (2000).
Columbia Law Review, May 2004

supremecourt.gov

Obergefell v. Hodges, No. 14-556, slip op. Archived 2019-10-02 at the Wayback Machine at 24 (U.S. June 26, 2015).
Timbs v. Indiana, 586 U.S. Argued November 28, 2018—Decided February 20, 2019

texaslawreview.org

William J. Aceves (September 9, 2019). "A Distinction with a Difference: Rights, Privileges, and the Fourteenth Amendment". Tex. L. Rev. 98.

unl.edu

law.unl.edu

Justice Thomas, in a concurring opinion in Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow, expressed his view that Everson was wrongly decided and that incorporation of the Establishment Clause is not justified under the Constitution. See Nussbaum, Martha Craven (2008). Liberty of conscience: in defense of America's tradition of religious equality. Basic Books. pp. 105 et seq. and Chapter 4. ISBN 978-0-465-05164-9. Richard F. Duncan (2007). "JUSTICE THOMAS AND PARTIAL INCORPORATION OF THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE: HEREIN OF STRUCTURAL LIMITATIONS, LIBERTY INTERESTS, AND TAKING INCORPORATION SERIOUSLY" (PDF). Regent University Law Review. 20: 37–56. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 15, 2013.

web.archive.org

Chu, Vivian (September 21, 2009). "The Second Amendment and Incorporation: An Overview of Recent Appellate Cases" (PDF). Congressional Research Service. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 6, 2022. Retrieved October 13, 2017.
West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, Majority Opinion, item 3 (US 1943) ("The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections."), archived from the original.
Obergefell v. Hodges, No. 14-556, slip op. Archived 2019-10-02 at the Wayback Machine at 24 (U.S. June 26, 2015).
Justice Thomas, in a concurring opinion in Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow, expressed his view that Everson was wrongly decided and that incorporation of the Establishment Clause is not justified under the Constitution. See Nussbaum, Martha Craven (2008). Liberty of conscience: in defense of America's tradition of religious equality. Basic Books. pp. 105 et seq. and Chapter 4. ISBN 978-0-465-05164-9. Richard F. Duncan (2007). "JUSTICE THOMAS AND PARTIAL INCORPORATION OF THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE: HEREIN OF STRUCTURAL LIMITATIONS, LIBERTY INTERESTS, AND TAKING INCORPORATION SERIOUSLY" (PDF). Regent University Law Review. 20: 37–56. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 15, 2013.
Vance, Laurence M. (May 9, 2012). "Does the First Amendment Protect the Freedom of Association? The Future of Freedom Foundation". The Future of Freedom Foundation. Archived from the original on June 17, 2023.
"Bill of Rights Institute: Incorporation". Bill of Rights Center. Archived from the original on October 12, 2013. Retrieved October 11, 2013.
de Vogue, Ariane; Tatum, Sophie (February 20, 2019). "Now we know what Ruth Bader Ginsburg was doing". CNN. Archived from the original on February 28, 2019. Retrieved February 20, 2019.
Liptak, Adam (February 20, 2019). "Supreme Court Puts Limits on Police Power to Seize Private Property". The New York Times. Archived from the original on April 10, 2020. Retrieved February 20, 2019.

yale.edu

digitalcommons.law.yale.edu

Akhil Reed Amar and Renee Lettow Lerner, "Fifth Amendment First Principles: The Self- Incrimination Clause", Michigan Law Review 93 (1995): 857, accessed February 15, 2015.