Indra Sawhney & Others v. Union of India (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Indra Sawhney & Others v. Union of India" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
60th place
43rd place
1st place
1st place
52nd place
35th place
3,689th place
2,081st place
26th place
20th place
low place
low place
17th place
15th place

indianexpress.com

  • "Court, quota and cream". The Indian Express. 20 October 2006. Archived from the original on 13 May 2008. Retrieved 17 November 2011.
  • Nair, Shalini (18 April 2017). "BJP's OBC pitch: How stronger new backward classes panel will function". The Indian Express. Archived from the original on 15 April 2019. Retrieved 28 March 2020.
  • "Explained: Order reserved". 23 March 2015. Retrieved 4 March 2019.
  • "For an equitable society, reservations must be extended to private sector". 23 October 2015.

indiankanoon.org

  • "Indra Sawhney Etc. vs Union Of India And Others, Etc. on 16 November, 1992". IndianKanoon.org. Archived from the original on 17 September 2012. Retrieved 22 August 2012. (4) Reservation being an extreme form of protective measure or affirmative action it should be confined to a minority of seats. Even though the Constitution does not lay down any specific bar but the constitutional philosophy being against proportional equality the principle of balancing equality ordains reservation, of any manner, not to exceed 50%." , "Reservation in promotion is constitutionally impermissible as once the advantaged and disadvantaged are made equal and are brought in one class or group then any further benefit extended for promotion on the inequality existing prior to being brought in the group would be treating equals unequally. It would not be eradicating the effects of past discrimination but perpetuating it.

indiatimes.com

timesofindia.indiatimes.com

jstor.org

  • Basavaraju, C. (2009). "Reservation Under the Constitution of India: Issues and Perspectives". Journal of the Indian Law Institute. 51 (2): 271. JSTOR 43953443.

legalbites.in

thehindu.com

web.archive.org

  • "Court, quota and cream". The Indian Express. 20 October 2006. Archived from the original on 13 May 2008. Retrieved 17 November 2011.
  • "Indra Sawhney Etc. vs Union Of India And Others, Etc. on 16 November, 1992". IndianKanoon.org. Archived from the original on 17 September 2012. Retrieved 22 August 2012. (4) Reservation being an extreme form of protective measure or affirmative action it should be confined to a minority of seats. Even though the Constitution does not lay down any specific bar but the constitutional philosophy being against proportional equality the principle of balancing equality ordains reservation, of any manner, not to exceed 50%." , "Reservation in promotion is constitutionally impermissible as once the advantaged and disadvantaged are made equal and are brought in one class or group then any further benefit extended for promotion on the inequality existing prior to being brought in the group would be treating equals unequally. It would not be eradicating the effects of past discrimination but perpetuating it.
  • Nair, Shalini (18 April 2017). "BJP's OBC pitch: How stronger new backward classes panel will function". The Indian Express. Archived from the original on 15 April 2019. Retrieved 28 March 2020.