Informal fallacy (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Informal fallacy" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1,865th place
1,260th place
2nd place
2nd place
11th place
8th place
179th place
183rd place
462nd place
345th place
1st place
1st place
3rd place
3rd place
1,379th place
1,175th place
low place
low place
1,425th place
1,138th place
1,523rd place
976th place
5th place
5th place
3,593rd place
3,273rd place
710th place
648th place
79th place
65th place
305th place
264th place
92nd place
72nd place
269th place
201st place
low place
low place

books.google.com

cambridge.org

dictionary.cambridge.org

degruyter.com

doi.org

encyclopedia.com

  • Stump, David J. "Fallacy, Logical". www.encyclopedia.com. Retrieved 20 March 2021.
  • Mackie, J. L. (1967). "Fallacies". www.encyclopedia.com. Retrieved 19 March 2021.

escholarship.org

fallacyfiles.org

meiner.de

newsweek.com

  • Trudolyubov, Maxim (15 January 2017), "How Putin succeeded in undermining our institutions", Newsweek, retrieved 3 July 2017, The way the Kremlin has always reacted to reports about corruption or arbitrary police rule, or the state of Russia's penal institutions, is by generating similar reports about the West. Whatever the other party says the answer is always the same: 'Look who's talking.' This age-old technique, dubbed 'whataboutism', is in essence an appeal to hypocrisy; its only purpose is to discredit the opponent, not to refute the original argument.

npr.org

oxforddictionaries.com

en.oxforddictionaries.com

oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com

philpapers.org

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

stanford.edu

plato.stanford.edu

  • Hansen, Hans (2020). "Fallacies". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 18 March 2021.
  • Groarke, Leo (2020). "Informal Logic: 4. Assessing Arguments". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 20 March 2021.
  • Bartha, Paul (2019). "Analogy and Analogical Reasoning". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved 21 January 2021.

utm.edu

iep.utm.edu

  • Dowden, Bradley. "Fallacies". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 19 March 2021.

web.archive.org

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

wsj.com

  • Zimmer, Ben (9 June 2017). "The Roots of the 'What About?' Ploy". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 22 July 2017. "Whataboutism" is another name for the logical fallacy of "tu quoque" (Latin for "you also"), in which an accusation is met with a counter-accusation, pivoting away from the original criticism. The strategy has been a hallmark of Soviet and post-Soviet propaganda, and some commentators have accused President Donald Trump of mimicking Mr. Putin's use of the technique.