Injunction (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Injunction" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

6web.archive.org

1^st place

4theguardian.com

12^th place

11^th place

3ssrn.com

703^rd place

501^st place

3scholar.google.com

1,697^th place

1,040^th place

2criterioneconomics.com

low place

1cornell.edu

332^nd place

246^th place

1leagle.com

4,919^th place

2,808^th place

1casetext.com

4,010^th place

2,209^th place

1ravellaw.com

low place

1archive.org

6^th place

1ncsmc.org.au

low place

1nsw.gov.au

640^th place

382^nd place

1loc.gov

70^th place

63^rd place

1westlaw.com

low place

1americanbar.org

7,096^th place

4,044^th place

1doi.org

2^nd place

1semanticscholar.org

11^th place

8^th place

1bu.edu

2,120^th place

1,328^th place

1justice.gov

918^th place

556^th place

1bailii.org

3,544^th place

1,912^th place

1pressgazette.co.uk

4,037^th place

2,203^rd place

1parliament.uk

367^th place

243^rd place

1thisislondon.co.uk

2,075^th place

1,281^st place

1telegraph.co.uk

30^th place

24^th place

1ghostarchive.org

32^nd place

21^st place

1bbc.co.uk

8^th place

10^th place

1europa.eu

68^th place

117^th place

americanbar.org

"Understanding Injunctions". Insights. American Bar Association. Winter 2014. Retrieved 6 September 2017.

archive.org

Dobbs, Dan (1993). Law of Remedies: Damages—Equity—Restitution (2 ed.). St. Paul, Minnesota: West Publishing Co. p. 224. ISBN 0-314-00913-2.

bailii.org

England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Willis Ltd & Anor v Jardine Lloyd Thompson Group Plc & Ors, 2015, EWCA Civ 450 (22 April 2015)

bbc.co.uk

"Media concession made in injunction report". BBC News. 20 May 2011. Retrieved 20 May 2011.

bu.edu

scholarship.law.bu.edu

Pedro, Portia (1 June 2018). "Stays". California Law Review. 106 (3): 869.

casetext.com

28 U.S.C. § 2342 ("The court of appeals ... has exclusive jurisdiction to enjoin, set aside, suspend (in whole or in part), or to determine the validity of...."); 8 U.S.C. § 1252(f) ("Limit on injunctive relief'); Jennings v. Rodriguez, 583 U.S. ___, ___, 138 S.Ct. 830, 851 (2018); Wheaton College v. Burwell, 134 S.Ct. 2806, 2810-11 (2014) ("Under our precedents, an injunction is appropriate only if (1) it is necessary or appropriate in aid of our jurisdiction, and (2) the legal rights at issue are indisputably clear.") (internal quotation marks and brackets omitted); Lux v. Rodrigues, 561 U.S. 1306, 1308 (2010); Correctional Services Corp. v. Malesko, 534 U.S. 61, 74 (2001) (stating that "injunctive relief has long been recognized as the proper means for preventing entities from acting unconstitutionally."); Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418 (2009); see also Alli v. Decker, 650 F.3d 1007, 1011 (3d Cir. 2011); Andreiu v. Ashcroft, 253 F.3d 477, 482-85 (9th Cir. 2001) (en banc).

cornell.edu

law.cornell.edu

28 U.S.C. § 2342 ("The court of appeals ... has exclusive jurisdiction to enjoin, set aside, suspend (in whole or in part), or to determine the validity of...."); 8 U.S.C. § 1252(f) ("Limit on injunctive relief'); Jennings v. Rodriguez, 583 U.S. ___, ___, 138 S.Ct. 830, 851 (2018); Wheaton College v. Burwell, 134 S.Ct. 2806, 2810-11 (2014) ("Under our precedents, an injunction is appropriate only if (1) it is necessary or appropriate in aid of our jurisdiction, and (2) the legal rights at issue are indisputably clear.") (internal quotation marks and brackets omitted); Lux v. Rodrigues, 561 U.S. 1306, 1308 (2010); Correctional Services Corp. v. Malesko, 534 U.S. 61, 74 (2001) (stating that "injunctive relief has long been recognized as the proper means for preventing entities from acting unconstitutionally."); Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418 (2009); see also Alli v. Decker, 650 F.3d 1007, 1011 (3d Cir. 2011); Andreiu v. Ashcroft, 253 F.3d 477, 482-85 (9th Cir. 2001) (en banc).

criterioneconomics.com

J. Gregory Sidak, Injunctive Relief and the FRAND Commitment in the United States at 16, forthcoming in 1 Cambridge Handbook of Technical Standardization Law: Antitrust and Patents (Jorge L. Contreras ed., Cambridge Univ. Press 2017), https://www.criterioneconomics.com/injunctive-relief-and-the-frand-commitment-in-the-united-states.html.
J. Gregory Sidak, The Meaning of FRAND, Part II: Injunctions, 11 J. COMP L. & ECON 201 (2015), https://www.criterioneconomics.com/meaning-of-frand-injunctions-for-standard-essential-patents.html.

doi.org

Laycock, Douglas (2012). "The Neglected Defense of Undue Hardship (and the Doctrinal Train Wreck in Boomer v. Atlantic Cement)". Journal of Tort Law. 4 (3): 1. doi:10.1515/1932-9148.1123. S2CID 155015267. SSRN 2040896.

europa.eu

eur-lex.europa.eu

"EUR-Lex - 52017DC0708 - EN - EUR-Lex". eur-lex.europa.eu. Retrieved 12 May 2021.

ghostarchive.org

Swinford, Steven (21 March 2011). "'Hyper-injunction' stops you talking to MP". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 12 January 2022.

justice.gov

Press Release, U.S. Dep't of Justice, Statement of the Department of Justice Antitrust Division on Its Decision to Close Its Investigation of Samsung's Use of Its Standards-Essential Patents (7 Feb. 2014) [hereinafter DOJ Closes Its Samsung Investigation], available at http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/press_releases/2014/303547.pdf; Decision and Order § IV.D, Robert Bosch GmbH, No. C-4377 (F.T.C. 23 Apr. 2013). Archived 2014-04-07 at the Wayback Machine

leagle.com

28 U.S.C. § 2342 ("The court of appeals ... has exclusive jurisdiction to enjoin, set aside, suspend (in whole or in part), or to determine the validity of...."); 8 U.S.C. § 1252(f) ("Limit on injunctive relief'); Jennings v. Rodriguez, 583 U.S. ___, ___, 138 S.Ct. 830, 851 (2018); Wheaton College v. Burwell, 134 S.Ct. 2806, 2810-11 (2014) ("Under our precedents, an injunction is appropriate only if (1) it is necessary or appropriate in aid of our jurisdiction, and (2) the legal rights at issue are indisputably clear.") (internal quotation marks and brackets omitted); Lux v. Rodrigues, 561 U.S. 1306, 1308 (2010); Correctional Services Corp. v. Malesko, 534 U.S. 61, 74 (2001) (stating that "injunctive relief has long been recognized as the proper means for preventing entities from acting unconstitutionally."); Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418 (2009); see also Alli v. Decker, 650 F.3d 1007, 1011 (3d Cir. 2011); Andreiu v. Ashcroft, 253 F.3d 477, 482-85 (9th Cir. 2001) (en banc).

loc.gov

Zeldin, Wendy (30 December 2015). "Constitutional Court Rulings on "Reasonable Suspicion" in Criminal Procedure Code". Library of Congress. Retrieved 28 December 2020.

ncsmc.org.au

"New South Wales – Apprehended Violence Orders". National Council of Single Mothers and Their Children. Archived from the original on 11 February 2011. Retrieved 26 September 2010.

nsw.gov.au

legalaid.nsw.gov.au

"Are you applying for an AVO?". Legal Aid New South Wales. Archived from the original on 22 October 2015. Retrieved 2 August 2016.

parliament.uk

publications.parliament.uk

"House of Commons Hansard Debates for 17 Mar 2011". Parliament of the United Kingdom. 17 March 2011.

pressgazette.co.uk

Press Gazette, 14 October 2009, MPs slam 'super injunction' which gagged Guardian Archived 16 June 2011 at the Wayback Machine

ravellaw.com

Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418 Archived 23 November 2018 at the Wayback Machine, 428 (2009) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).

scholar.google.com

"Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7 (2008)". Google Scholar. Retrieved 6 September 2017.
"eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C., 547 U.S. 388 (2006)". Google Scholar. Retrieved 6 September 2017.
"A.W. Chesterton Co., Inc. v. Chesterton, 128 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 1997)". Google Scholar. Retrieved 6 September 2017.

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

Laycock, Douglas (2012). "The Neglected Defense of Undue Hardship (and the Doctrinal Train Wreck in Boomer v. Atlantic Cement)". Journal of Tort Law. 4 (3): 1. doi:10.1515/1932-9148.1123. S2CID 155015267. SSRN 2040896.

ssrn.com

papers.ssrn.com

Bray, Samuel (2014). "A Little Bit of Laches Goes a Long Way: Notes on Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc". Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc. 67: 1. SSRN 2376080.
Bray, Samuel (2014). "The Myth of the Mild Declaratory Judgment". Duke Law Journal. 63: 1091. SSRN 2330050.
Laycock, Douglas (2012). "The Neglected Defense of Undue Hardship (and the Doctrinal Train Wreck in Boomer v. Atlantic Cement)". Journal of Tort Law. 4 (3): 1. doi:10.1515/1932-9148.1123. S2CID 155015267. SSRN 2040896.

telegraph.co.uk

Swinford, Steven (21 March 2011). "'Hyper-injunction' stops you talking to MP". The Daily Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 12 January 2022.

theguardian.com

Robinson, James (13 October 2009). "How super-injunctions are used to gag investigative reporting". The Guardian. London.
"Trafigura drops bid to gag Guardian over MP's question", The Guardian, 13 October 2009.
Leigh, David (29 March 2011). "Superinjunction scores legal first for nameless financier in libel action". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 3 April 2011.
Tim Dowling (21 March 2011). "Got secrets you want to keep? Get a hyper-injunction". The Guardian. London.

thisislondon.co.uk

Greenslade, Roy (20 April 2011). "Law is badly in need of reform as celebrities hide secrets". Evening Standard. London. Archived from the original on 24 April 2011. Retrieved 30 April 2011.

web.archive.org

Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418 Archived 23 November 2018 at the Wayback Machine, 428 (2009) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).
"New South Wales – Apprehended Violence Orders". National Council of Single Mothers and Their Children. Archived from the original on 11 February 2011. Retrieved 26 September 2010.
"Are you applying for an AVO?". Legal Aid New South Wales. Archived from the original on 22 October 2015. Retrieved 2 August 2016.
Press Release, U.S. Dep't of Justice, Statement of the Department of Justice Antitrust Division on Its Decision to Close Its Investigation of Samsung's Use of Its Standards-Essential Patents (7 Feb. 2014) [hereinafter DOJ Closes Its Samsung Investigation], available at http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/press_releases/2014/303547.pdf; Decision and Order § IV.D, Robert Bosch GmbH, No. C-4377 (F.T.C. 23 Apr. 2013). Archived 2014-04-07 at the Wayback Machine
Press Gazette, 14 October 2009, MPs slam 'super injunction' which gagged Guardian Archived 16 June 2011 at the Wayback Machine
Greenslade, Roy (20 April 2011). "Law is badly in need of reform as celebrities hide secrets". Evening Standard. London. Archived from the original on 24 April 2011. Retrieved 30 April 2011.

westlaw.com

content.next.westlaw.com

Baysal, Pelin (3 January 2019). "Litigation and enforcement in Turkey: overview". Westlaw. Retrieved 28 December 2020.