Insurance policy (English Wikipedia)

Clore, Duncan L. (1998). Financial Institution Bonds (2nd ed.). Chicago: American Bar Association. p. 431. ISBN 9781570736209.
Anderson, Eugene R.; Stanzler, Jordan S.; Masters, Lorelie S. (1999). "§ 11.01, Introduction". Insurance Coverage Litigation (2020 supp. ed.). Wolters Kluwer. p. 11-6. ISBN 978-0-7355-1173-6.
Anderson, Eugene R.; Stanzler, Jordan S.; Masters, Lorelie S. (2013). Insurance Coverage Litigation (2nd ed.). New York: Wolters Kluwer. p. 1–32. ISBN 9780735511736. Retrieved 9 August 2022.
Anderson, Eugene R.; Stanzler, Jordan S.; Masters, Lorelie S. (2013). Insurance Coverage Litigation (2nd ed.). New York: Wolters Kluwer. p. 1–31. ISBN 9780735511736. Retrieved 9 August 2022.
Mathias, Jr., John H.; Shugrue, John D.; Thomas A., Marrinson; Daniel J., Struck (2006). "§ 1.01, Components of an Insurance Policy". Insurance Coverage Disputes. New York: Law Journal Press. p. 1–2. ISBN 1588520757. Retrieved 8 March 2017.
Mastin, John M.; Nelson, Eric L.; Robey, Ronald G. (2020). Smith, Currie & Hancock's Common Sense Construction Law: A Practical Guide for the Construction Professional (6th ed.). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. p. 541. ISBN 9781119540175. Retrieved January 15, 2024.
Mathias, Jr., John H.; Shugrue, John D.; Thomas A., Marrinson; Daniel J., Struck (2006). "§ 1.01, Components of an Insurance Policy". Insurance Coverage Disputes. New York: Law Journal Press. p. 1–6. ISBN 1588520757. Retrieved 8 March 2017.
Mathias, Jr., John H.; Shugrue, John D.; Thomas A., Marrinson; Daniel J., Struck (2006). "§ 1.01, Components of an Insurance Policy". Insurance Coverage Disputes. New York: Law Journal Press. p. 1–5. ISBN 1588520757. Retrieved 8 March 2017.
Mathias, Jr., John H.; Shugrue, John D.; Thomas A., Marrinson; Daniel J., Struck (2006). "§ 1.01, Components of an Insurance Policy". Insurance Coverage Disputes. New York: Law Journal Press. p. 1–7. ISBN 1588520757. Retrieved 8 March 2017.
Mathias, Jr., John H.; Shugrue, John D.; Thomas A., Marrinson; Daniel J., Struck (2006). "§ 1.03, Types of Insurance Policies". Insurance Coverage Disputes. New York: Law Journal Press. p. 1–16. ISBN 1588520757. Retrieved 8 March 2017.

ceb.com

online.ceb.com

Hadland v. NN Investors Life Ins. Co., 24 Cal. App. 4th 1578, 30 Cal. Rptr. 2d 88 (1994). However, what constitutes a conspicuous, plain, and clear exclusion from coverage was later interpreted narrowly in favor of the insured by MacKinnon v. Truck Ins. Exchange, 31 Cal.4th 635, 3 Cal.Rptr.3d 228, 73 P.3d 1205, 1216 (2003).

insurancejournal.com

E&O Insights: Directors & Officers Liability Is Not Your Normal Insurance Product. Insurance Journal.

insurancejournal.org

Rahdert MC. (1998). Reasonable Expectations Revisited Archived 2016-10-20 at the Wayback Machine. Conn. Ins. Law Journal.

irmi.com

Time To Standardize Personal Umbrella Insurance Policies. IRMI.

nytimes.com

bucks.blogs.nytimes.com

Schwarzc D. (2011). Reevaluating Standardized Insurance Policies Archived 2016-03-04 at the Wayback Machine. The University of Chicago Law Review. See also: Not All Homeowners’ Policies Are Alike. New York Times.

opencrs.com

assets.opencrs.com

Impact of the Abolition of McCarran-Ferguson Antitrust Exemption for the “Business of Insurance” Archived 2014-07-14 at the Wayback Machine. CRS.

propertycasualty360.com

Policy Issues: ISO Program Revisions. PropertyCasualty360.

scholar.google.com

Hadland v. NN Investors Life Ins. Co., 24 Cal. App. 4th 1578, 30 Cal. Rptr. 2d 88 (1994). However, what constitutes a conspicuous, plain, and clear exclusion from coverage was later interpreted narrowly in favor of the insured by MacKinnon v. Truck Ins. Exchange, 31 Cal.4th 635, 3 Cal.Rptr.3d 228, 73 P.3d 1205, 1216 (2003).
Corban v. United Services Auto. Ass'n, 20 So.3d 601 (Miss. 2009) (analyzing "named perils" coverage).
Vision One v. Philadelphia Indem. Ins. Co., 174 Wash. 2d 501, 276 P.3d 300 (2012) (analyzing "named perils" and "specific perils" coverage).
Intermetal Mexicana v. Insurance Co. of North America, 866 F.2d 71 (3d Cir. 1989) (analyzing "all risks" coverage).
JH France Refractories Co. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 626 A.2d 502, 534 Pa. 29 (1993) (analyzing "all sums" coverage).
Baker v. National Interstate Ins. Co. 180 Cal. App. 4th 1319, 103 Cal. Rptr. 3d 565 (2009). This case explains how the modern clause more clearly excludes both the "products" and "completed operations" hazards as separate things (i.e., each hazard is separately excluded), as opposed to the prior version which was held to apply only when both hazards were present.
Insurance Co. of North America v. Electronic Purification Co., 67 Cal. 2d 679, 63 Cal. Rptr. 382, 433 P.2d 174 (1967).
Dart Industries, Inc. v. Commercial Union Insurance Co., 28 Cal. 4th 1059, 124 Cal. Rptr. 2d 142, 52 P.3d 79 (2002).

ssrn.com

Boardman M. (2006). Contra Proferentem: The Allure of Ambiguous Boilerplate. Michigan Law Review.

uchicago.edu

lawreview.uchicago.edu

Schwarzc D. (2011). Reevaluating Standardized Insurance Policies Archived 2016-03-04 at the Wayback Machine. The University of Chicago Law Review. See also: Not All Homeowners’ Policies Are Alike. New York Times.

web.archive.org

Rahdert MC. (1998). Reasonable Expectations Revisited Archived 2016-10-20 at the Wayback Machine. Conn. Ins. Law Journal.
Impact of the Abolition of McCarran-Ferguson Antitrust Exemption for the “Business of Insurance” Archived 2014-07-14 at the Wayback Machine. CRS.
Schwarzc D. (2011). Reevaluating Standardized Insurance Policies Archived 2016-03-04 at the Wayback Machine. The University of Chicago Law Review. See also: Not All Homeowners’ Policies Are Alike. New York Times.