Integrated gasification combined cycle (English Wikipedia)

Stephens, Jennie C. (May 2, 2005). "Coupling CO₂ Capture and Storage with Coal Gasification: Defining "Sequestration-Ready" IGCC" (PDF). Energy Technology Innovation Project, Harvard University. Retrieved 1 May 2016.
"Syngas Composition for IGCC". National Energy Technology Laboratory. US Department of Energy. Archived from the original on 22 May 2022. Retrieved 30 April 2016.
"nuon | netl.doe.gov". www.netl.doe.gov. Retrieved 2018-01-12.

doi.org

Padurean, Anamaria (5 July 2011). "Pre-combustion carbon dioxide capture by gas–liquid absorption for Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle power plants". International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 7: 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.12.007. Retrieved 28 April 2016.
Padurean, Anamaria (5 July 2011). "Pre-combustion carbon dioxide capture by gas–liquid absorption for Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle power plants". International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 7: 1. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.12.007. Retrieved 28 April 2016.
Wabash (August 2000). "Wabash River Coal Gasification Repowering Project Final Technical Report" (PDF). Work Performed Under Cooperative Agreement DE-FC21-92MC29310. The U.S. Department of Energy / Office of Fossil Energy / National Energy Technology Laboratory / Morgantown, West Virginia. doi:10.2172/787567. Retrieved 2008-06-30. As a result, process waste water arising from use of the current feedstock, remains out of permit compliance due to elevated levels of arsenic, selenium and cyanide. To rectify these concerns, plant personnel have been working on several potential equipment modifications and treatment alternatives to bring the discharge back into compliance. Wabash River is currently obligated to resolve this issue by September 2001. [p. ES-6] Elevated levels of selenium, cyanide and arsenic in the waste water have caused the process waste water to be out of permit compliance. Daily maximum values, though not indicated in the table above, were routinely exceeded for selenium and cyanide, and only occasionally for arsenic. [p. 6-14, Table 6.1L]
El Gemayel, Jimmy (2014). "Simulation of the integration of a bitumen upgrading facility and an IGCC process with carbon capture". Fuel. 117: 1288–1297. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2013.06.045.
Rubin, Edward (26 April 2007). "Cost and performance of fossil fuel power plants with CO2 capture and storage" (PDF). Energy Policy. 35 (9): 4444–4454. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2007.03.009. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-05-25. Retrieved 5 May 2016.
Rubin, Edward (26 April 2007). "Cost and performance of fossil fuel power plants with CO2 capture and storage" (PDF). Energy Policy. 34 (9): 4444–4454. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2007.03.009. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-05-25. Retrieved 5 May 2016.

eastman.com

"Eastman Chemical Company - The results of insight™". Eastman.com. Retrieved 2013-10-13.

eia.gov

"Updated Capital Cost Estimates for Utility Scale Electricity Generating Plants". U.S. Energy Information Administration. U.S. Energy Information Administration. Retrieved 5 May 2016.

energy.gov

fossil.energy.gov

"Clean Coal Research | Department of Energy". www.fossil.energy.gov. Retrieved 2016-05-27.

energy.gov

US DOE Office of Inspector General, Feb 2018 (PDF)

fossiltransition.org

"Costs and Challenges of CCS". Clear Air Task Force. Archived from the original on 28 June 2016. Retrieved 5 May 2016.

gepower.com

"Products & Services". Gepower.com. Retrieved 2013-10-13.

hillaryclinton.com

[2] Archived January 24, 2008, at the Wayback Machine

iea-coal.org.uk

Davidson, Robert (December 2011). "Pre-combustion capture of CO2 in IGCC plants". Profiles-IEA Clean Coal Centre. Retrieved 1 May 2016.

ieefa.org

Schlissel, David. "The Kemper IGCC Project: Cost and Schedule Risks" (PDF). The Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysi.

marketwire.com

"Archived copy". www.marketwire.com. Archived from the original on 31 August 2019. Retrieved 17 January 2022.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)

mit.edu

sequestration.mit.edu

"Kemper County IGCC Fact Sheet: Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage Project". Caron Capture & Sequestration Technologies @ MIT. MIT. Retrieved 28 April 2016.

mncoalgasplant.com

"State of Minnesota : Office of the Attorney General" (PDF). Mncoalgasplant.com. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-10-16. Retrieved 2013-10-13.

nuon.com

[1] Archived October 15, 2008, at the Wayback Machine

osti.gov

Wabash (August 2000). "Wabash River Coal Gasification Repowering Project Final Technical Report" (PDF). Work Performed Under Cooperative Agreement DE-FC21-92MC29310. The U.S. Department of Energy / Office of Fossil Energy / National Energy Technology Laboratory / Morgantown, West Virginia. doi:10.2172/787567. Retrieved 2008-06-30. As a result, process waste water arising from use of the current feedstock, remains out of permit compliance due to elevated levels of arsenic, selenium and cyanide. To rectify these concerns, plant personnel have been working on several potential equipment modifications and treatment alternatives to bring the discharge back into compliance. Wabash River is currently obligated to resolve this issue by September 2001. [p. ES-6] Elevated levels of selenium, cyanide and arsenic in the waste water have caused the process waste water to be out of permit compliance. Daily maximum values, though not indicated in the table above, were routinely exceeded for selenium and cyanide, and only occasionally for arsenic. [p. 6-14, Table 6.1L]