Internet Watch Foundation and Wikipedia (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Internet Watch Foundation and Wikipedia" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
12th place
11th place
1,317th place
873rd place
low place
low place
14th place
14th place
132nd place
96th place
706th place
437th place
6th place
6th place
low place
low place
38th place
40th place
36th place
33rd place
low place
7,149th place
6,227th place
4,028th place
197th place
356th place
low place
low place
1,216th place
797th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
30th place
24th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
9,306th place
5,713th place
1,428th place
2,976th place
457th place
272nd place
1,501st place
2,959th place
3,285th place
2,156th place

archive.org

  • Berelian, Essi (2003). Buckley, Peter; Buckley Jonathan (eds.). The Rough Guide to Rock. London: Rough Guides. p. 909. ISBN 1-84353-105-4.

archive.today

assemblee-nationale.fr

  • "Appendix to the LOPPSI bill" (PDF). Assemblée nationale. 27 May 2009. p. 12. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 September 2012. Retrieved 31 July 2009. Le récent blocage, au mois de décembre 2008, en Angleterre du site Wikipédia par le filtre de l'Internet Watch Foundation du fait de la présence d'une photo de l'album « virgin killer » du groupe rock Scorpion a été commenté comme un exemple des limites d'un filtre qui ne discrimine pas. The recent blocking of Wikipedia in England in December 2008 by a filter from the Internet Watch Foundation, because of a photo from the album "virgin killer" by the rock band Scorpions, has been given as an example of the effect of an indiscriminate filter.

bookchin.net

channel4.com

cio.com

econtentmag.com

eff.org

guardian.co.uk

observer.guardian.co.uk

independent.co.uk

  • Raphael G. Satter (8 December 2008). "Wikipedia article blocked in UK over child photo". The Independent. UK. Archived from the original on 9 December 2008. Retrieved 18 May 2009. "It appears that there's a large number of editors — I can't say all — who appear to have access issues," [Jay Walsh, Wikimedia Foundation] said. [Sarah Robertson, Internet Watch Foundation] said she could not explain reports that other parts of the site were difficult to navigate as a result of the block. "There shouldn't have been any collateral damage," she said.

itproportal.com

security.itproportal.com

iwf.org.uk

linx.net

publicaffairs.linx.net

metal-rules.com

openrightsgroup.org

pcworld.com

sentryparentalcontrols.co.uk

smh.com.au

stuff.co.nz

telecompaper.com

telegraaf.nl

telegraph.co.uk

theguardian.com

theregister.co.uk

thinkbroadband.com

web.archive.org

webmink.net

wikimediafoundation.org

wikipedia.org

en.wikipedia.org

yahoo.com

news.yahoo.com

  • LeClaire, Jennifer (8 December 2008). "UK Agency Blocks Wikipedia Image, Editing of Site". Yahoo! News. newsfactor.com. Archived from the original on 11 December 2008. Retrieved 9 December 2008. On its Web site, Wikipedia said several large ISPs that cooperate with the IWF subsequently blocked the image, affecting an estimated 95 percent of residential Internet users in the UK ... ". Due to the way the block was created (via transparent proxies), users from the affected ISPs now share a small number of IP addresses. This means that a user committing vandalism cannot be distinguished from all the other people on the same ISP," Wikipedia said ... ". Unfortunately, the effect of this is that all users from the affected ISPs are temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia. Simply viewing the site is not affected, aside from the blocked article and image."