Jihad Ahmed Mustafa Dhiab (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Jihad Ahmed Mustafa Dhiab" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
1,697th place
1,040th place
3,008th place
5,630th place
1,596th place
964th place
7th place
7th place
9,939th place
6,377th place
30th place
24th place
752nd place
484th place
low place
low place
290th place
202nd place
1,367th place
1,176th place
41st place
34th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
8th place
10th place
696th place
428th place
1,429th place
932nd place
310th place
208th place
low place
6,995th place
low place
low place
4,875th place
3,037th place
34th place
27th place
581st place
738th place
519th place
316th place

amnesty.org

ap.org

bigstory.ap.org

bbc.co.uk

news.bbc.co.uk

boston.com

cageprisoners.com

christusrex.org

dod.mil

elobservador.com.uy

harvardlawreview.org

  • Note, Recent Case: D.C. Circuit Holds Press Cannot Unseal Classified Videos of Guantanamo Bay Detainee, 131 Harv. L. Rev. 902 (2018).

justia.com

docs.justia.com

miamiherald.com

  • "South Africa turns away former hunger-striking Guantánamo detainee". Miami Herald. December 16, 2016.
  • Carol Rosenberg (June 17, 2016). "Former Guantánamo hunger striker sent to Uruguay may have gone to Brazil". Miami Herald. Archived from the original on June 18, 2016. Retrieved June 18, 2016. Law enforcement is now searching for former detainee Abu Wa'el Dhiab in Brazil. A Syrian national, he is sometimes also identified as Jihad Ahmed Mustafa Dhiab.

nyt.com

int.nyt.com

nytimes.com

int-shared1.ec2.nytimes.com

nytimes.com

scholar.google.com

seattletimes.com

telegraph.co.uk

theislamicmonthly.com

trtworld.com

typepad.com

natseclaw.typepad.com

upi.com

usatoday.com

  • "U.S. military reviews 'enemy combatant' use". USA Today. October 11, 2007. Archived from the original on October 23, 2007. Critics called it an overdue acknowledgment that the so-called Combatant Status Review Tribunals are unfairly geared toward labeling detainees the enemy, even when they pose little danger. Simply redoing the tribunals won't fix the problem, they said, because the system still allows coerced evidence and denies detainees legal representation.

voanews.com

washingtonpost.com

web.archive.org