LOCOLPROL - System Safety ReportArchived 2009-12-22 at the Wayback Machine, "The
safety objective of 10−9/h for the LOCOPROL signalling system could only be accepted when
the set of proof will take into account all the involved parameters, including common failures
modes and degraded situation management, and the assessment of the dependability of the
whole system.", "Therefore a full compliancy to the railway safety CENELEC standards and best practices in the railway field is clearly not achievable to this research project.", "The signalling also validated the fact the use of, at least, passive eurobalises is necessary to mitigate the risk during train position initialisation but also at singular location as points or in the vicinity of a railway station to counter the lack of accuracy of the satellite train positioning."
LOCOLPROL - System Safety ReportArchived 2009-12-22 at the Wayback Machine, "The
safety objective of 10−9/h for the LOCOPROL signalling system could only be accepted when
the set of proof will take into account all the involved parameters, including common failures
modes and degraded situation management, and the assessment of the dependability of the
whole system.", "Therefore a full compliancy to the railway safety CENELEC standards and best practices in the railway field is clearly not achievable to this research project.", "The signalling also validated the fact the use of, at least, passive eurobalises is necessary to mitigate the risk during train position initialisation but also at singular location as points or in the vicinity of a railway station to counter the lack of accuracy of the satellite train positioning."
