O'Hara v State, 448 So.2d 524, 529 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District 1984) ("(Footnote [13]) Ubi eadem ratio ibi; idem jus; et de similibus idem est judicium. Where there is the same reason, there is the same law; and where there are similar situations, the judgment is the same.").
doi.org
Hanna, Heather Jane; Harding, Alan G. (2008). "Ubi Jus Ibi Remedium - for the Violation of Every Right, There Must be a Remedy: The Supreme Court's Refusal to Use the Bivens Remedy in Wilkie v. Robbins". Wyoming Law Review. 8: 193–229. doi:10.59643/1942-9916.1167.
justia.com
law.justia.com
Gordon v. Steele, 376 F. Supp. 575, 577–78 (W.D. Pa. 1974) ("The fact of residency must be coupled with a finding of intent to remain indefinitely")(quoting Gallagher v. Philadelphia Transp. Co., 185 F.2d 543, 546 (3d Cir. 1950))
