List of amendments to the Constitution of the United States (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "List of amendments to the Constitution of the United States" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
6,211th place
3,772nd place
1st place
1st place
446th place
308th place
4,010th place
2,209th place
2,275th place
1,288th place
2,619th place
2,163rd place
7th place
7th place
1,336th place
769th place
low place
low place
758th place
500th place
2,734th place
1,606th place
1,418th place
966th place
730th place
468th place
696th place
428th place
28th place
26th place

archives.gov

c-span.org

casetext.com

clayton.edu

cnn.com

congress.gov

constitutioncenter.org

heritage.org

  • England, Trent; Spalding, Matthew. "Essays on Article V: Amendments". The Heritage Guide to The Constitution. The Heritage Foundation. Retrieved October 29, 2018.

justia.com

law.justia.com

  • State of Idaho v. Freeman, 529 F. Supp. 1107 (D. Idaho 25 January 1982; vacated for mootness 4 October 1982) ("The Court further declares that Congress' attempted extension of the time for the ratification of the twenty-seventh amendment was null and void.").

nytimes.com

pewresearch.org

senate.gov

unt.edu

digital.library.unt.edu

uscourts.gov

ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov

  • Virginia v. Ferriero, 525 F. Supp. 3d 36, 61 (D.D.C. 5 March 2021) ("[A] ratification deadline in a proposing resolution's introduction is just as effective as one in the text of a proposed amendment. Plaintiffs' ratifications came after both the original and extended deadlines that Congress attached to the ERA, so the Archivist is not bound to record them as valid.").

cadc.uscourts.gov

  • Illinois v. Ferriero, 60 F.4th 704, 719 (D.C. Cir. 28 February 2023) ("In conclusion, the States have not clearly and indisputably shown that the Archivist had a duty to certify and publish the ERA or that Congress lacked the authority to place a time limit in the proposing clause of the ERA. Under the rigid standard required for mandamus actions, this Court must affirm the District Court...").

web.archive.org