Louise Labé (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Louise Labé" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
27th place
51st place
1st place
1st place
low place
low place

siefar.org

  • The French webpage entitled "Louise Labé attaquée!" ("Louise Labe attacked!") at "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2006-11-29. Retrieved 2007-04-04.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) is collecting published responses to Huchon's book and making them available online. Scholars who disagree with part or all of Huchon's theory include Emmanuel Buron, "Claude de Taillemont et les Escriz de divers Poëtes à la louenge de Louïze Labé Lionnoize. Discussion critique de Louise Labé, une créature de papier, de Mireille Huchon," L'Information littéraire 2, 2006, p. 38-46 ("Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-02-06. Retrieved 2007-04-04.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)); Henri Hours and Bernard Plessy, "Sur Louise Labé, rien de nouveau," Le Bulletin des Lettres, October 2006, p. 3-5 ([1] Archived 2006-11-29 at the Wayback Machine); Madeleine Lazard, "Droit de réponse envoyé au Monde des livres, non publié" ([2] Archived 2006-11-29 at the Wayback Machine ); Daniel Martin, "Louise Labé est-elle 'une creature de papier'?" Réforme, Humanisme, Renaissance 63, December 2006, p. 7-37 ("Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-06-14. Retrieved 2007-04-04.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)); and Eliane Viennot, "Notice sur Louise Labé," Théâtre de femmes de l'Ancien Régime, December 2006, p. 377-379 ([3] Archived 2006-11-29 at the Wayback Machine ).

web.archive.org

  • The French webpage entitled "Louise Labé attaquée!" ("Louise Labe attacked!") at "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2006-11-29. Retrieved 2007-04-04.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) is collecting published responses to Huchon's book and making them available online. Scholars who disagree with part or all of Huchon's theory include Emmanuel Buron, "Claude de Taillemont et les Escriz de divers Poëtes à la louenge de Louïze Labé Lionnoize. Discussion critique de Louise Labé, une créature de papier, de Mireille Huchon," L'Information littéraire 2, 2006, p. 38-46 ("Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-02-06. Retrieved 2007-04-04.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)); Henri Hours and Bernard Plessy, "Sur Louise Labé, rien de nouveau," Le Bulletin des Lettres, October 2006, p. 3-5 ([1] Archived 2006-11-29 at the Wayback Machine); Madeleine Lazard, "Droit de réponse envoyé au Monde des livres, non publié" ([2] Archived 2006-11-29 at the Wayback Machine ); Daniel Martin, "Louise Labé est-elle 'une creature de papier'?" Réforme, Humanisme, Renaissance 63, December 2006, p. 7-37 ("Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-06-14. Retrieved 2007-04-04.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)); and Eliane Viennot, "Notice sur Louise Labé," Théâtre de femmes de l'Ancien Régime, December 2006, p. 377-379 ([3] Archived 2006-11-29 at the Wayback Machine ).

wikisource.org

en.wikisource.org