Majority judgment (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Majority judgment" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
2nd place
2nd place
11th place
8th place
1,031st place
879th place
low place
low place
1,293rd place
3,794th place
5th place
5th place
207th place
136th place
383rd place
320th place
69th place
59th place

archives-ouvertes.fr

halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr

arxiv.org

doi.org

doi.org

dx.doi.org

github.com

googlegroups.com

1007421605497013616-a-1802744773732722657-s-sites.googlegroups.com

  • Majority judgment's inventors argue that meaning should be assigned to the absolute rating that the system assigns to a candidate; that if one electorate rates candidate X as "excellent" and Y as "good", while another one ranks X as "acceptable" and Y as "poor", these two electorates do not in fact agree. Therefore, they define a criterion they call "rating consistency", which majority judgment passes. Balinski and Laraki, "Judge, don't Vote", November 2010

pnas.org

psu.edu

citeseerx.ist.psu.edu

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org