Manipur (princely state) (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Manipur (princely state)" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

16doi.org

2^nd place

14books.google.com

3^rd place

11jstor.org

26^th place

20^th place

11worldcat.org

5^th place

10archive.org

6^th place

7inflibnet.ac.in

4,441^st place

2,938^th place

5handle.net

102^nd place

76^th place

4taylorfrancis.com

3,142^nd place

2,072^nd place

3semanticscholar.org

11^th place

8^th place

2wikisource.org

27^th place

51^st place

2uchicago.edu

230^th place

214^th place

1ssrn.com

703^rd place

501^st place

1ruhm.es

low place

1journalppw.com

low place

1boletindeliteraturaoral.com

low place

1oxforddnb.com

284^th place

187^th place

1upenn.edu

702^nd place

520^th place

1worldstatesmen.org

1,772^nd place

1,955^th place

1imphaltimes.com

low place

1e-pao.net

low place

5,988^th place

1web.archive.org

1^st place

1iinet.net.au

5,676^th place

3,527^th place

1le.ac.uk

5,357^th place

3,654^th place

1crwflags.com

1,852^nd place

1,494^th place

archive.org

Fantz, Paul R.; Pradeep, S. V. (1995). Clitoria (Leguminosae) of South Eastern Asia.
Nath, Rajmohan (1948). The back-ground of Assamese culture. A. K. Nath. p. 90.
R. Boileau Pemberton (1835). Report On Eastern Frontier Of British India. pp. 47–48. in June, 1825, he compelled them to evacuate the Muneepoor valley. In the following year, having obtained some re-inforcements, he entered Kubo, attacked the Burmese forces in their stockaded position at Tummoo, and pursuing them across the Ungoching hills, cleared the western bank of the Ningthee river of every opposing detachment...
Mcculloh (1980). Valley Of Manipur. p. 38.
Aitchison, C. U. (Comp ) (1931). Collection of Treaties, Engagements and Sanads Relating to India and Neighbouring Countries. Vol. 12 edn: 5. Kerala State Library. Calcutta. p. 197.
McCulloch, W. (1859). Account of the Valley of Munnipore and of the Hill Tribes. Selections from the Records of the Government of India (Foreign Department). Calcutta: Bengal Printing Company. OCLC 249105916 – via archive.org.
Brown, R. (1874), Statistical Account of the Native State of Manipur and the Hill Territory under Its Rule, Calcutta: Office of the Superintendent of Government Printing
Johnstone, Sir James (1896), My Experiences in Manipur and the Naga Hills, London: Sampson Low, Marston and Company – via archive.org
Shakespear, J. (1912), The Lushei Kuki Clans, London: McMillan and Co – via archive.org
Singh, History of the Christian Missions in Manipur (1991), p. 9. Singh, Karam Manimohan (1991), History of the Christian Missions in Manipur and Neighbouring States, Mittal Publications, ISBN 81-7099-285-0 – via archive.org

boletindeliteraturaoral.com

"Colonial Historiography As A Lens To Comprehend The History Of Manipur". Boletin de Literatura Oral - the Literary Journal. 10 (1): 1474–1483. 1 November 2023.

books.google.com

Sen (1992), p. 17 Sen, Sipra (1992), Tribes and Castes of Manipur: Description and Select Bibliography, Mittal Publications, ISBN 81-7099-310-5
Parratt, Saroj Nalini (2005). The Court Chronicle of the Kings of Manipur: 33-1763 CE. Routledge. pp. 14, 174. ISBN 978-0-415-34430-2.
Somorjit, Wangam (1 March 2016). Manipur: The Forgotten Nation of Southeast Asia. Waba Publications & Advanced Research Consortium. ISBN 978-81-926687-2-7.
Thant, Myint-U (2001), The Making of Modern Burma, Cambridge University Press, p. 15, ISBN 978-0-521-79914-0
Phanjoubam, Pradip (2015), The Northeast Question: Conflicts and frontiers, Routledge, pp. 3–4, ISBN 978-1-317-34004-1: "After comprehensively defeating the Burmese in 1826 in Assam and Manipur, and the signing of the Treaty of Yandabo, the British annexed Assam, but allowed Manipur to remain a protectorate state."
Sanatomba, Interrogation into the political status of Manipur 2015. Sanatomba, Kangujam (2015), "Interrogation into the political status of Manipur", in Arambam Noni; Kangujam Sanatomba (eds.), Colonialism and Resistance: Society and State in Manipur, Routledge, pp. 159–180, ISBN 978-1-317-27066-9
Subramanian, K. S. (5 October 2015). State, Policy and Conflicts in Northeast India. Routledge & CRC Press. pp. 31–32. ISBN 978-1-317-39651-2. With the lapse of British paramountcy in 1947, the state reverted to its pre-1891 autonomy...
Ranjan, Amit; Chattoraj, Diotima (26 May 2023). Migration, Regional Autonomy, and Conflicts in Eastern South Asia: Searching for a Home(land). Springer Nature. p. 176. ISBN 978-3-031-28764-0. There is no legal and constitutional validity of the Instrument of Accession signed on 11 August 1947 that vested matters such as defense, external affairs, and communication in the Dominion of India..
Why Pre-Merger Political Status for Manipur: Under the Framework of the Instrument of Accession, 1947, Research and Media Cell, CIRCA, 2018, p. 26, GGKEY:8XLWSW77KUZ, Before the controversial merger, both Manipur and India were bound by the Instrument of Accession (IOA) which the King of Manipur signed on 11 August 1947. The IOA was accepted by the Governor General of India Lord Mountbatten on 16 August 1947 vide Home Department, Government of India file no A-1/1/1947. Subsequently, the Manipur State Council approved the IOA in its meeting held on 22 August 1947 Vide Memo No. 383 PTI Reference Council Minutes Part I of 11-8-1947. The execution of the Instrument of Accession was published in the Manipur State Gazette on 27 August 1947.
Sanatomba, Interrogation into the political status of Manipur (2015), p. 169 Sanatomba, Kangujam (2015), "Interrogation into the political status of Manipur", in Arambam Noni; Kangujam Sanatomba (eds.), Colonialism and Resistance: Society and State in Manipur, Routledge, pp. 159–180, ISBN 978-1-317-27066-9
Wirsing, R.; Ahrari, E. (26 February 2010). Fixing Fractured Nations: The Challenge of Ethnic Separatism in the Asia-Pacific. Springer. p. 123. ISBN 978-0-230-28127-1.
Guha, Ramachandra (2008), India after Gandhi: The History of the World's Largest Democracy, Pan Macmillan, Section 13.V, ISBN 978-0330396110
Agnihotri, Constitutional Development in North-East India (1996), p. 68. Agnihotri, S. K. (1996), "Constitutional Development in North-East India since 1947", in B. Datta-Ray; S. P. Agrawal (eds.), Reorganization of North-East India Since 1947, Concept Publishing Company, pp. 57–92, ISBN 978-81-7022-577-5
Epstein, M. (2016), The Statesman's Year-Book: Statistical and Historical Annual of the States of the World for the Year 1932, Springer, p. 75, ISBN 978-0-230-27061-9

crwflags.com

"Manipur". Retrieved 1 April 2015.

doi.org

Keen, Caroline (2015). An Imperial Crisis in British India. I.B. Tauris. pp. 150–152. doi:10.5040/9780755624355. ISBN 978-1-78673-987-2. Ghose maintained that under the Indian Penal Code only subjects of the Queen or foreigners residing in British India could be guilty of waging war against the Queen. Manipur was an independent sovereign state and..
Andaya, Barbara Watson; Andaya, Leonard Y. (19 February 2015). A History of Early Modern Southeast Asia, 1400–1830. Cambridge University Press. p. 264. doi:10.1017/cbo9781139051323. ISBN 978-0-521-88992-6.
Naorem, Deepak (2024), Chakrabarti, Anjan; Chakraborty, Gorky; Chakraborty, Anup Shekhar (eds.), "Making a 'Peter the Great' in an Imperial Frontier: Educating 'Natives' and Introducing English Language and Roman Script in Manipur", Indigeneity, Development and Sustainability: Perspectives from Northeast India, Demographic Transformation and Socio-Economic Development, vol. 18, Singapore: Springer Nature, pp. 345–360, doi:10.1007/978-981-97-1436-0_17, ISBN 978-981-97-1436-0, retrieved 7 July 2024: "the kingdom of Manipur, often referred in the colonial accounts as Meckley"
Arora, Vibha; Kipgen, Ngamjahao (2012). "The Politics of Identifying with and Distancing from Kuki Identity in Manipur". Sociological Bulletin. 61 (3): 429–449. doi:10.1177/0038022920120303. ISSN 0038-0229. JSTOR 26290634. S2CID 157167951. Historically, Manipur was an independent kingdom ruled by Meitei dynasty. The physical boundary of Manipur has been fluctuating with historical changes in political power and the intra state and the inter state boundaries
Yuhlung, Cheithou Charles (2013). "The Identity of Pakhangpa: The Mystical Dragon-Python God of Chothe of Manipur". SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2317260. ISSN 1556-5068.
Laichen 2003, pp. 505–506. Laichen, Sun (2003). "Military Technology Transfers from Ming China and the Emergence of Northern Mainland Southeast Asia (c. 1390-1527)". Journal of Southeast Asian Studies. 34 (3). Cambridge University Press: 495–517. doi:10.1017/S0022463403000456 (inactive 1 December 2024). JSTOR 20072535. S2CID 162422482.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of December 2024 (link)
Meetei, Naorem Malemsanba (2015), "Consolidation of British 'Indirect Rule' in Manipur", Colonialism and Resistance, Routledge India, p. 151, doi:10.4324/9781315638317-14 (inactive 1 December 2024), ISBN 978-1-315-63831-7, retrieved 11 May 2024{{citation}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of December 2024 (link)
Sanjeev, Thingnam (2015), "Recasting Space: Politics of frontier-making", Colonialism and Resistance, Routledge India, p. 243, doi:10.4324/9781315638317-21 (inactive 1 December 2024), ISBN 978-1-315-63831-7, retrieved 14 May 2024{{citation}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of December 2024 (link)
Reynolds, K. D. (2010). "Grimwood [née Moore; other married name Miller], Ethel Brabazon [pseud. Ethel St Clair Grimwood] (1867–1928), the heroine of Manipur". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/101006. Retrieved 11 October 2020. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
Pum Khan Pau (2012) Tedim Road—The Strategic Road on a Frontier: A Historical Analysis, Strategic Analysis, 36:5, 776-786, doi:10.1080/09700161.2012.712387
Sanatomba, Kangujam (2015), "Interrogating into the Political Status of Manipur", Colonialism and Resistance, Routledge India, doi:10.4324/9781315638317-15 (inactive 1 December 2024), ISBN 978-1-315-63831-7, retrieved 11 May 2024{{citation}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of December 2024 (link):"Furthermore, Section 9(b) of the Manipur State Constitution Act, 1947, would certainly dispel any doubt about the titular status of the Maharaja, which was expressedly stated thus: ‘The Maharaja means His Highness, the Maharaja of Manipur, the constitutional head of the state.’ The Maharaja in his capacity as the constitutional ruler could not execute the Instrumentwithout proper authorisation and constitutional endorsement. This was simply on account of the fact that he was not a sovereign ruler and that Manipur was not a sovereign state then. Therefore, the act of signing the Instrument of Accession on 11 August 1947 by the Maharaja could not be considered an Act of the State. Hence, the Instrument was deemed null and void right from the moment it was executed... "
Furber, The Unification of India (1951), p. 357: "... in July and August 1947 all of the princely states within the geographical orbit of India as distinct from that of Pakistan (except Hyderabad, Kashmir and Junagadh) "acceded" to India in accordance with the procedure laid down in the [Government of] India Act of 1935 as adapted and amended by the Government of the new Dominion of India. The important states "acceded" only with respect to defence, external affairs and communications as defined in List I of Schedule VII of the [Government of] India Act of 1935." Furber, Holden (1951), "The Unification of India, 1947–1951", Pacific Affairs, 24 (4), Pacific Affairs, University of British Columbia: 352–371, doi:10.2307/2753451, JSTOR 2753451
Sanatomba, Kangujam (2015), "Interrogating into the Political Status of Manipur", Colonialism and Resistance, Routledge India, pp. 164–175, doi:10.4324/9781315638317-15 (inactive 1 December 2024), ISBN 978-1-315-63831-7, retrieved 11 May 2024{{citation}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of December 2024 (link)
Haokip, Thongkholal (2012). "Political Integration of Northeast India: A Historical Analysis". Strategic Analysis. 36 (2): 304–314. doi:10.1080/09700161.2012.646508. ISSN 0970-0161. S2CID 153661583.: "The Maharajah of Manipur was invited to Shillong in September 1949 for talks on integration.... The Maharaja was placed under house arrest and debarred from any communication with the outside world. The Maharaja was thus forced to sign the ‘Merger Agreement’ with India on September 21, 1949, and Manipur became a 'Part-C state' of the Indian Union."

dx.doi.org

Keen, Caroline (2015). An Imperial Crisis in British India. I.B. Tauris. pp. 150–152. doi:10.5040/9780755624355. ISBN 978-1-78673-987-2. Ghose maintained that under the Indian Penal Code only subjects of the Queen or foreigners residing in British India could be guilty of waging war against the Queen. Manipur was an independent sovereign state and..
Andaya, Barbara Watson; Andaya, Leonard Y. (19 February 2015). A History of Early Modern Southeast Asia, 1400–1830. Cambridge University Press. p. 264. doi:10.1017/cbo9781139051323. ISBN 978-0-521-88992-6.

e-pao.net

Khomdom, Lisam (5 July 2018). "Manipur State Constitution Act-1947 A Cure for all myriads of ailments in Manipur ?". E Pao.

handle.net

hdl.handle.net

Sudhirkumar Singh, Socio-religious and Political Movements (2011), chapter 6, p. 139: "The Dominion of India once again successfully convinced the Maharaja of Manipur to sign the Instrument of Accession along with the Governor General of India on 11 August 1947 on the promise of protecting the internal authority, autonomy and welfare of the state." Sudhirkumar Singh, Haorongbam (2011). Socio-religious and Political Movements in Modern Manipur 1934–51. INFLIBNET (PhD thesis). Jawaharlal Nehru University. hdl:10603/121665 – via Shodhganga.
Sudhirkumar Singh, Socio-religious and Political Movements (2011), Chapter 6, p. 145. Sudhirkumar Singh, Haorongbam (2011). Socio-religious and Political Movements in Modern Manipur 1934–51. INFLIBNET (PhD thesis). Jawaharlal Nehru University. hdl:10603/121665 – via Shodhganga.
Sudhirkumar Singh, Socio-religious and Political Movements (2011), pp. 49–50. Sudhirkumar Singh, Haorongbam (2011). Socio-religious and Political Movements in Modern Manipur 1934–51. INFLIBNET (PhD thesis). Jawaharlal Nehru University. hdl:10603/121665 – via Shodhganga.
Sudhirkumar Singh, Socio-religious and Political Movements (2011), pp. 139–140. Sudhirkumar Singh, Haorongbam (2011). Socio-religious and Political Movements in Modern Manipur 1934–51. INFLIBNET (PhD thesis). Jawaharlal Nehru University. hdl:10603/121665 – via Shodhganga.
Sudhirkumar Singh, Socio-religious and Political Movements (2011), pp. 141–142. Sudhirkumar Singh, Haorongbam (2011). Socio-religious and Political Movements in Modern Manipur 1934–51. INFLIBNET (PhD thesis). Jawaharlal Nehru University. hdl:10603/121665 – via Shodhganga.

iinet.net.au

members.iinet.net.au

"MANIPUR". Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 1 April 2015.

imphaltimes.com

Rinku, Khumukcham (26 December 2019). "De Jure Government of Manipur argues the legitimacy of 'Instrument of Accession'". Imphal Times.

inflibnet.ac.in

shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in

Sudhirkumar Singh, Socio-religious and Political Movements (2011), chapter 6, p. 139: "The Dominion of India once again successfully convinced the Maharaja of Manipur to sign the Instrument of Accession along with the Governor General of India on 11 August 1947 on the promise of protecting the internal authority, autonomy and welfare of the state." Sudhirkumar Singh, Haorongbam (2011). Socio-religious and Political Movements in Modern Manipur 1934–51. INFLIBNET (PhD thesis). Jawaharlal Nehru University. hdl:10603/121665 – via Shodhganga.
Sudhirkumar Singh, Socio-religious and Political Movements (2011), Chapter 6, p. 145. Sudhirkumar Singh, Haorongbam (2011). Socio-religious and Political Movements in Modern Manipur 1934–51. INFLIBNET (PhD thesis). Jawaharlal Nehru University. hdl:10603/121665 – via Shodhganga.
Sudhirkumar Singh, Socio-religious and Political Movements (2011), pp. 49–50. Sudhirkumar Singh, Haorongbam (2011). Socio-religious and Political Movements in Modern Manipur 1934–51. INFLIBNET (PhD thesis). Jawaharlal Nehru University. hdl:10603/121665 – via Shodhganga.
Sudhirkumar Singh, Socio-religious and Political Movements (2011), pp. 139–140. Sudhirkumar Singh, Haorongbam (2011). Socio-religious and Political Movements in Modern Manipur 1934–51. INFLIBNET (PhD thesis). Jawaharlal Nehru University. hdl:10603/121665 – via Shodhganga.
Sudhirkumar Singh, Socio-religious and Political Movements (2011), pp. 141–142. Sudhirkumar Singh, Haorongbam (2011). Socio-religious and Political Movements in Modern Manipur 1934–51. INFLIBNET (PhD thesis). Jawaharlal Nehru University. hdl:10603/121665 – via Shodhganga.

mzuir.inflibnet.ac.in

Thokchom, Princely State of Manipur (2022), Appendix IV. Thokchom, Veewon (2022). Princely State of Manipur: Durbar, the Raj and Resistances, C. 1900-1950 (PDF) (M. Phil. thesis). Aizwal: Department of History & Ethnography, Mizoram University.
Thokchom, Princely State of Manipur (2022), p. 10. Thokchom, Veewon (2022). Princely State of Manipur: Durbar, the Raj and Resistances, C. 1900-1950 (PDF) (M. Phil. thesis). Aizwal: Department of History & Ethnography, Mizoram University.

journalppw.com

Singh, Yumkhaibam Shyam (18 August 2022). "1891 Anglo-Manipuri War And Rarely Known Manipuri Heroes". Journal of Positive School Psychology. 6 (8): 4471–4478. ISSN 2717-7564. Gambhir Singh now decided to expel the Burmese from Kabaw Valley (plain area between Manipur of this day and the Chindwin River now in Burma) which had been for Manipur for ages in the past. Nur Singh was, therefore, sent along with 1000 men to Tamu on 1st January, 1826. On being asked for reinforcement, Gambhir Singh along with the two British officers left for Tamu on 13th January, 1826. Conquering not only Tamu but also Samsok, the prince unfurled the flag of Manipur on the bank of Chindwin on 1st February 1826.

jstor.org

Lloyd, Nick (2016). "Review of AN IMPERIAL CRISIS IN BRITISH INDIA: THE MANIPUR UPRISING OF 1891". Journal of the Society for Army Historical Research. 94 (380): 347–348. ISSN 0037-9700. JSTOR 44233143.
Temple, R. C. (1894). "Contributions Towards the History of Anglo: Burmese Words". Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland: 152–164. ISSN 0035-869X. JSTOR 25197187.
Arora, Vibha; Kipgen, Ngamjahao (2012). "The Politics of Identifying with and Distancing from Kuki Identity in Manipur". Sociological Bulletin. 61 (3): 429–449. doi:10.1177/0038022920120303. ISSN 0038-0229. JSTOR 26290634. S2CID 157167951. Historically, Manipur was an independent kingdom ruled by Meitei dynasty. The physical boundary of Manipur has been fluctuating with historical changes in political power and the intra state and the inter state boundaries
Singha, Memchaton (2016). "Marriage Diplomacy Between the States of Manipur and Burma, 18th to 19th Centuries". Proceedings of the Indian History Congress. 77: 874–879. ISSN 2249-1937. JSTOR 26552717. Both Manipur and Burma succeeded in maintaining their status as independent princely states until the British occupation by in the last part of 19th century
Waikhom, Rangitabali (2002). "Women's Society and Politics in Pre-Colonial Manipur". Proceedings of the Indian History Congress. 63: 1356–1357. ISSN 2249-1937. JSTOR 44158255.
Lieberman, Victor (1996). "POLITICAL CONSOLIDATION IN BURMA UNDER THE EARLY KONBAUNG DYNASTY 1752 – c. 1820". Journal of Asian History. 30 (2): 152–168. ISSN 0021-910X. JSTOR 41931038.
Bhattacharjee, J.B.; Bhattacharya, J.B. (2003). "'Loiyamba Shinyen': A Landmark in Meitei State Formation in Medieval Manipur". Proceedings of the Indian History Congress. 64: 362–368. ISSN 2249-1937. JSTOR 44145476.
Laichen 2003, pp. 505–506. Laichen, Sun (2003). "Military Technology Transfers from Ming China and the Emergence of Northern Mainland Southeast Asia (c. 1390-1527)". Journal of Southeast Asian Studies. 34 (3). Cambridge University Press: 495–517. doi:10.1017/S0022463403000456 (inactive 1 December 2024). JSTOR 20072535. S2CID 162422482.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of December 2024 (link)
Akoijam, A. Bimol (28 July 2001), "How History Repeats Itself", Economic and Political Weekly, 36 (30): 2807–2812, JSTOR 4410908
Banerjee, S. K. (January–March 1958), "Manipur State Constitution Act, 1947", The Indian Journal of Political Science, 19 (1): 35–38, JSTOR 42748891
Furber, The Unification of India (1951), p. 357: "... in July and August 1947 all of the princely states within the geographical orbit of India as distinct from that of Pakistan (except Hyderabad, Kashmir and Junagadh) "acceded" to India in accordance with the procedure laid down in the [Government of] India Act of 1935 as adapted and amended by the Government of the new Dominion of India. The important states "acceded" only with respect to defence, external affairs and communications as defined in List I of Schedule VII of the [Government of] India Act of 1935." Furber, Holden (1951), "The Unification of India, 1947–1951", Pacific Affairs, 24 (4), Pacific Affairs, University of British Columbia: 352–371, doi:10.2307/2753451, JSTOR 2753451

le.ac.uk

www2.le.ac.uk

C Gimson 1955-56, Leicester Literary and Philosophical Society.

oxforddnb.com

Reynolds, K. D. (2010). "Grimwood [née Moore; other married name Miller], Ethel Brabazon [pseud. Ethel St Clair Grimwood] (1867–1928), the heroine of Manipur". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/101006. Retrieved 11 October 2020. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)

ruhm.es

Laichen 2003, pp. 505–506. Laichen, Sun (2003). "Military Technology Transfers from Ming China and the Emergence of Northern Mainland Southeast Asia (c. 1390-1527)". Journal of Southeast Asian Studies. 34 (3). Cambridge University Press: 495–517. doi:10.1017/S0022463403000456 (inactive 1 December 2024). JSTOR 20072535. S2CID 162422482.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of December 2024 (link)

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

Arora, Vibha; Kipgen, Ngamjahao (2012). "The Politics of Identifying with and Distancing from Kuki Identity in Manipur". Sociological Bulletin. 61 (3): 429–449. doi:10.1177/0038022920120303. ISSN 0038-0229. JSTOR 26290634. S2CID 157167951. Historically, Manipur was an independent kingdom ruled by Meitei dynasty. The physical boundary of Manipur has been fluctuating with historical changes in political power and the intra state and the inter state boundaries
Laichen 2003, pp. 505–506. Laichen, Sun (2003). "Military Technology Transfers from Ming China and the Emergence of Northern Mainland Southeast Asia (c. 1390-1527)". Journal of Southeast Asian Studies. 34 (3). Cambridge University Press: 495–517. doi:10.1017/S0022463403000456 (inactive 1 December 2024). JSTOR 20072535. S2CID 162422482.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of December 2024 (link)
Haokip, Thongkholal (2012). "Political Integration of Northeast India: A Historical Analysis". Strategic Analysis. 36 (2): 304–314. doi:10.1080/09700161.2012.646508. ISSN 0970-0161. S2CID 153661583.: "The Maharajah of Manipur was invited to Shillong in September 1949 for talks on integration.... The Maharaja was placed under house arrest and debarred from any communication with the outside world. The Maharaja was thus forced to sign the ‘Merger Agreement’ with India on September 21, 1949, and Manipur became a 'Part-C state' of the Indian Union."

ssrn.com

Yuhlung, Cheithou Charles (2013). "The Identity of Pakhangpa: The Mystical Dragon-Python God of Chothe of Manipur". SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2317260. ISSN 1556-5068.

taylorfrancis.com

Meetei, Naorem Malemsanba (2015), "Consolidation of British 'Indirect Rule' in Manipur", Colonialism and Resistance, Routledge India, p. 151, doi:10.4324/9781315638317-14 (inactive 1 December 2024), ISBN 978-1-315-63831-7, retrieved 11 May 2024{{citation}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of December 2024 (link)
Sanjeev, Thingnam (2015), "Recasting Space: Politics of frontier-making", Colonialism and Resistance, Routledge India, p. 243, doi:10.4324/9781315638317-21 (inactive 1 December 2024), ISBN 978-1-315-63831-7, retrieved 14 May 2024{{citation}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of December 2024 (link)
Sanatomba, Kangujam (2015), "Interrogating into the Political Status of Manipur", Colonialism and Resistance, Routledge India, doi:10.4324/9781315638317-15 (inactive 1 December 2024), ISBN 978-1-315-63831-7, retrieved 11 May 2024{{citation}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of December 2024 (link):"Furthermore, Section 9(b) of the Manipur State Constitution Act, 1947, would certainly dispel any doubt about the titular status of the Maharaja, which was expressedly stated thus: ‘The Maharaja means His Highness, the Maharaja of Manipur, the constitutional head of the state.’ The Maharaja in his capacity as the constitutional ruler could not execute the Instrumentwithout proper authorisation and constitutional endorsement. This was simply on account of the fact that he was not a sovereign ruler and that Manipur was not a sovereign state then. Therefore, the act of signing the Instrument of Accession on 11 August 1947 by the Maharaja could not be considered an Act of the State. Hence, the Instrument was deemed null and void right from the moment it was executed... "
Sanatomba, Kangujam (2015), "Interrogating into the Political Status of Manipur", Colonialism and Resistance, Routledge India, pp. 164–175, doi:10.4324/9781315638317-15 (inactive 1 December 2024), ISBN 978-1-315-63831-7, retrieved 11 May 2024{{citation}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of December 2024 (link)

uchicago.edu

press.uchicago.edu

https://press.uchicago.edu/books/HOC/HOC_V2_B2/HOC_VOLUME2_Book2_chapter18.pdf ^{[bare URL PDF]}

dsal.uchicago.edu

"Imperial Gazetteer2 of India, Volume 17, page 186 – Imperial Gazetteer of India – Digital South Asia Library". Retrieved 1 April 2015.

upenn.edu

digital.library.upenn.edu

Ethel St. Clair Grimwood, My Three Years in Manipur and Escape from the Recent Mutiny (fl.1891)

web.archive.org

"MANIPUR". Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 1 April 2015.

wikisource.org

en.wikisource.org

Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Manipur" . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 17 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 582.
Boase, George Clement (1893). "McCulloch, John Ramsay" . Dictionary of National Biography. Vol. 35. pp. 19–21, see page 21 ..."McCulloch, William (1816–1885), resident at Manipur, McCulloch's eldest son........hold his office at Manipur till the middle of 1845, when he was promoted to the post of political agent there"....

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

Lloyd, Nick (2016). "Review of AN IMPERIAL CRISIS IN BRITISH INDIA: THE MANIPUR UPRISING OF 1891". Journal of the Society for Army Historical Research. 94 (380): 347–348. ISSN 0037-9700. JSTOR 44233143.
Temple, R. C. (1894). "Contributions Towards the History of Anglo: Burmese Words". Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland: 152–164. ISSN 0035-869X. JSTOR 25197187.
Arora, Vibha; Kipgen, Ngamjahao (2012). "The Politics of Identifying with and Distancing from Kuki Identity in Manipur". Sociological Bulletin. 61 (3): 429–449. doi:10.1177/0038022920120303. ISSN 0038-0229. JSTOR 26290634. S2CID 157167951. Historically, Manipur was an independent kingdom ruled by Meitei dynasty. The physical boundary of Manipur has been fluctuating with historical changes in political power and the intra state and the inter state boundaries
Singha, Memchaton (2016). "Marriage Diplomacy Between the States of Manipur and Burma, 18th to 19th Centuries". Proceedings of the Indian History Congress. 77: 874–879. ISSN 2249-1937. JSTOR 26552717. Both Manipur and Burma succeeded in maintaining their status as independent princely states until the British occupation by in the last part of 19th century
Waikhom, Rangitabali (2002). "Women's Society and Politics in Pre-Colonial Manipur". Proceedings of the Indian History Congress. 63: 1356–1357. ISSN 2249-1937. JSTOR 44158255.
Lieberman, Victor (1996). "POLITICAL CONSOLIDATION IN BURMA UNDER THE EARLY KONBAUNG DYNASTY 1752 – c. 1820". Journal of Asian History. 30 (2): 152–168. ISSN 0021-910X. JSTOR 41931038.
Yuhlung, Cheithou Charles (2013). "The Identity of Pakhangpa: The Mystical Dragon-Python God of Chothe of Manipur". SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2317260. ISSN 1556-5068.
Bhattacharjee, J.B.; Bhattacharya, J.B. (2003). "'Loiyamba Shinyen': A Landmark in Meitei State Formation in Medieval Manipur". Proceedings of the Indian History Congress. 64: 362–368. ISSN 2249-1937. JSTOR 44145476.
Singh, Yumkhaibam Shyam (18 August 2022). "1891 Anglo-Manipuri War And Rarely Known Manipuri Heroes". Journal of Positive School Psychology. 6 (8): 4471–4478. ISSN 2717-7564. Gambhir Singh now decided to expel the Burmese from Kabaw Valley (plain area between Manipur of this day and the Chindwin River now in Burma) which had been for Manipur for ages in the past. Nur Singh was, therefore, sent along with 1000 men to Tamu on 1st January, 1826. On being asked for reinforcement, Gambhir Singh along with the two British officers left for Tamu on 13th January, 1826. Conquering not only Tamu but also Samsok, the prince unfurled the flag of Manipur on the bank of Chindwin on 1st February 1826.
Haokip, Thongkholal (2012). "Political Integration of Northeast India: A Historical Analysis". Strategic Analysis. 36 (2): 304–314. doi:10.1080/09700161.2012.646508. ISSN 0970-0161. S2CID 153661583.: "The Maharajah of Manipur was invited to Shillong in September 1949 for talks on integration.... The Maharaja was placed under house arrest and debarred from any communication with the outside world. The Maharaja was thus forced to sign the ‘Merger Agreement’ with India on September 21, 1949, and Manipur became a 'Part-C state' of the Indian Union."
McCulloch, W. (1859). Account of the Valley of Munnipore and of the Hill Tribes. Selections from the Records of the Government of India (Foreign Department). Calcutta: Bengal Printing Company. OCLC 249105916 – via archive.org.

worldstatesmen.org

"Indian Princely States K-Z". Retrieved 1 April 2015.