Margin of appreciation (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Margin of appreciation" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

772^nd place

849^th place

2^nd place

2^nd place

1openedition.org

666^th place

1,300^th place

5^th place

5^th place

1questionegiustizia.it

low place

low place

low place

low place

1,210^th place

1,422^nd place

bayefsky.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

See, for example, the Human Rights Committee view in Hertzberg et al. v Finland to grant 'a certain margin of discretion' to 'responsible national authorities', under the Optional Protocol of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) (para. 2.5).

coe.int (Global: 772^nd place; English: 849^th place)

hudoc.echr.coe.int

The Sunday Times v United Kingdom, no. 6538/74, § 61, ECHR 1979 A30.
Lawless v Ireland, no. 332/57, ECHR 1961 A3 (N.B. verbatim record of the hearing on 8 April). Cited in J. Christoffersen, Fair Balance: Proportionality, Subsidiarity and Primarity in the European Convention on Human Rights (Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2009) at 244.
Case Relating to Certain Aspects of the Laws on the Use of Languages in Education in Belgium ("Belgian Linguistic Case") (No. 2), no. 1474/62, 1677/62, 1691/62, 1769/63, 1994/63, 2126/64, §10, ECHR 1968 A6.
Handyside v United Kingdom, no. 5493/72, §48, ECHR 1976 A24.
Ibid., §49.
"Belgian Linguistic Case" (No. 2), above n 6, §5.
See, for example, Dudgeon v United Kingdom, no. 7525/76, ECHR 1981 A45; ADT v United Kingdom, no. 35765/97, ECHR 2000-IX; and, Goodwin v United Kingdom, no. 28957/95, ECHR 2002-VI.
See, for example, Stummer v Austria, no. 37452/02, ECHR 2011.
See, for example, Lautsi v Italy, no. 30814/06, ECHR 2011.
See, for example, Hardy & Maile v United Kingdom, no. 31965/07, ECHR 2012.
Dickson v United Kingdom, no. 44362/04, §78, ECHR 2007-V.

conventions.coe.int

Protocol No. 15 amending the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (yet to be signed by all High Contracting Parties).

doi.org (Global: 2^nd place; English: 2^nd place)

Roffee, J. A. (2014). "No Consensus on Incest? Criminalisation and Compatibility with the European Convention on Human Rights". Human Rights Law Review. 14 (3): 541–572. doi:10.1093/hrlr/ngu023.
Orunesu, Claudina (2020-06-10). "Conventionality control and international judicial supremacy". Revus. Journal for Constitutional Theory and Philosophy of Law / Revija za ustavno teorijo in filozofijo prava (40): 45–62. doi:10.4000/revus.5838. ISSN 1581-7652.

ohchr.org (Global: 1,210^th place; English: 1,422^nd place)

See, for example, the Human Rights Committee view in Hertzberg et al. v Finland to grant 'a certain margin of discretion' to 'responsible national authorities', under the Optional Protocol of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) (para. 2.5).

openedition.org (Global: 666^th place; English: 1,300^th place)

journals.openedition.org

Orunesu, Claudina (2020-06-10). "Conventionality control and international judicial supremacy". Revus. Journal for Constitutional Theory and Philosophy of Law / Revija za ustavno teorijo in filozofijo prava (40): 45–62. doi:10.4000/revus.5838. ISSN 1581-7652.

questionegiustizia.it (Global: low place; English: low place)

Francesco Perrone, La Divisione ricerca della Corte Edu: impatto sulle decisioni della Corte e profili di criticità, Questione giustizia, speciale n. 1/2019 (La Corte di Strasburgo a cura di Francesco Buffa e Maria Giuliana Civinini).

worldcat.org (Global: 5^th place; English: 5^th place)

search.worldcat.org

Orunesu, Claudina (2020-06-10). "Conventionality control and international judicial supremacy". Revus. Journal for Constitutional Theory and Philosophy of Law / Revija za ustavno teorijo in filozofijo prava (40): 45–62. doi:10.4000/revus.5838. ISSN 1581-7652.