Honan 2005, p. 194 "A nearly collusive relationship between the two dramatists, starting around 1590, really ensured that Tamburlaine's revolution in form and significant ideas would not die out. Much depended upon a fresh attitude to creativity itself, and it was Marlowe who most encouraged Shakespeare to bring stateliness and a high poetic habit to the drama." Honan, Park (2005). Christopher Marlowe: Poet & Spy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-19-818695-3.
Those suspecting this include: Nicholl 1992, pp. 327–29; Breight 1996, p. 114; Hammer 1996, pp. 225–42; Trow 2001, p. 250; Nicholl 2002, pp. 415–17 (a different theory); Kendall 2003, pp. 272–79; Haynes 2004, pp. 121–22; Riggs 2004, p. 334; and Honan 2005, p. 354. Only Downie 2000, pp. 26–27, and Kuriyama 2002, p. 136, accepted the verdict of the jury as it was reported. Nicholl, Charles (1992). The Reckoning: The Murder of Christopher Marlowe. London: Jonathan Cape. ISBN0-224-03100-7. Breight, Curtis C. (1996). Surveillance, Militarism, and Drama in the Elizabethan Era. London: Macmillan. Hammer, Paul E. J. (1996). "A Reckoning Reframed: The 'Murder' of Christopher Marlowe Revisited". English Literary Renaissance. No. 26. pp. 225–42. Trow, M.J. (2001). Who Killed Kit Marlowe? A Contract to Murder in Elizabethan England. Stroud, Glos.: Sutton Publishing. ISBN0-7509-2689-9. Nicholl, Charles (2002). The Reckoning: The Murder of Christopher Marlowe (2nd ed.). London: Vintage. ISBN0-09-943747-3. Kendall, Roy (2003). Christopher Marlowe and Richard Baines: Journeys through the Elizabethan Underground. London: Associated University Presses. ISBN0-8386-3974-7. Haynes, Alan (2004). The Elizabethan Secret Services. Sutton Publishing. ISBN0-7509-4006-9. Riggs, David (2004). The World of Christopher Marlowe. London: Faber & Faber. ISBN0-571-22160-2. Honan, Park (2005). Christopher Marlowe: Poet & Spy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-19-818695-3. Downie, J.A. (2000). "Marlowe: facts and fictions". In Downie, J.A.; Parnell, J.T. (eds.). Constructing Christopher Marlowe. Cambridge University Press. pp. 13–29. ISBN0-521-57255-X. Kuriyama, Constance Brown (2002). Christopher Marlowe: A Renaissance Life. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. ISBN0-8014-3978-7.
The publication of Marlovian Peter Farey's article Marlowe's Sudden and Fearful End (Farey 2005), in which there was no mention of Shakespeare at all, signalled a shift of emphasis which is evident in the Introduction to Daryl Pinksen's Marlowe's Ghost (Pinksen 2008, p. xix). See also Rosalind Barber's lecture on her doctoral research, Rethinking ShakespeareArchived 7 September 2012 at the Wayback Machine, published by the University of Sussex. Farey, Peter (2005). "Marlowe's Sudden and Fearful End: Self-Defence, Murder or Fake?". The Marlowe Society Research Journal (2): 27–60. ISSN1745-591X. Retrieved 30 April 2015. Pinksen, Daryl (2008). Marlowe's Ghost: The Blacklisting of the Man Who Was Shakespeare. New York: iUniverse. ISBN978-0-595-47514-8.
Only four times in twenty-five years, in fact. Michael Rubbo's film was awarded a share of the prize in 2002, and in 2007 Peter Farey's Hoffman and the Authorship, an out-and-out Marlovian essay, was selected as a joint winner, as was Donna Murphy's Christopher Marlowe and the Authorship of Early English Anonymous Plays in 2010, and Dr. Ros Barber's novel-in-verse, The Marlowe Papers, in 2011.
The publication of Marlovian Peter Farey's article Marlowe's Sudden and Fearful End (Farey 2005), in which there was no mention of Shakespeare at all, signalled a shift of emphasis which is evident in the Introduction to Daryl Pinksen's Marlowe's Ghost (Pinksen 2008, p. xix). See also Rosalind Barber's lecture on her doctoral research, Rethinking ShakespeareArchived 7 September 2012 at the Wayback Machine, published by the University of Sussex. Farey, Peter (2005). "Marlowe's Sudden and Fearful End: Self-Defence, Murder or Fake?". The Marlowe Society Research Journal (2): 27–60. ISSN1745-591X. Retrieved 30 April 2015. Pinksen, Daryl (2008). Marlowe's Ghost: The Blacklisting of the Man Who Was Shakespeare. New York: iUniverse. ISBN978-0-595-47514-8.
The publication of Marlovian Peter Farey's article Marlowe's Sudden and Fearful End (Farey 2005), in which there was no mention of Shakespeare at all, signalled a shift of emphasis which is evident in the Introduction to Daryl Pinksen's Marlowe's Ghost (Pinksen 2008, p. xix). See also Rosalind Barber's lecture on her doctoral research, Rethinking ShakespeareArchived 7 September 2012 at the Wayback Machine, published by the University of Sussex. Farey, Peter (2005). "Marlowe's Sudden and Fearful End: Self-Defence, Murder or Fake?". The Marlowe Society Research Journal (2): 27–60. ISSN1745-591X. Retrieved 30 April 2015. Pinksen, Daryl (2008). Marlowe's Ghost: The Blacklisting of the Man Who Was Shakespeare. New York: iUniverse. ISBN978-0-595-47514-8.
The publication of Marlovian Peter Farey's article Marlowe's Sudden and Fearful End (Farey 2005), in which there was no mention of Shakespeare at all, signalled a shift of emphasis which is evident in the Introduction to Daryl Pinksen's Marlowe's Ghost (Pinksen 2008, p. xix). See also Rosalind Barber's lecture on her doctoral research, Rethinking ShakespeareArchived 7 September 2012 at the Wayback Machine, published by the University of Sussex. Farey, Peter (2005). "Marlowe's Sudden and Fearful End: Self-Defence, Murder or Fake?". The Marlowe Society Research Journal (2): 27–60. ISSN1745-591X. Retrieved 30 April 2015. Pinksen, Daryl (2008). Marlowe's Ghost: The Blacklisting of the Man Who Was Shakespeare. New York: iUniverse. ISBN978-0-595-47514-8.
Kerrigan 1986, p. 11. For a discussion of how such approaches have changed over time, see Pinksen 2004, pp. 14–27. Kerrigan, John (1986). The Sonnets and A Lover's Complaint, by William Shakespeare. London: Penguin Books. Pinksen, Daryl (2004). "The Origins of the Shakespeare Authorship Debate". The Marlowe Society Research Journal (1): 14–27. ISSN1745-591X.