Marlovian theory of Shakespeare authorship (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Marlovian theory of Shakespeare authorship" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
6th place
6th place
low place
8,905th place
1st place
1st place
low place
low place
3rd place
3rd place
low place
low place
5th place
5th place
low place
low place
59th place
45th place
6,651st place
4,464th place
low place
low place
2nd place
2nd place
26th place
20th place
11th place
8th place
low place
low place
14th place
14th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,811th place
1,036th place
36th place
33rd place
1,152nd place
620th place
20th place
30th place
126th place
84th place
12th place
11th place

archive.org

archive.today

bbc.com

books.google.com

  • McCrea 2005, pp. xii–xiii; Further arguments for the orthodox position can be found in chapters 3 and 4 of Bate 1998, pp. 65–132, and the last chapter of Shapiro 2010, pp. 253–95. McCrea, Scott (2005). The Case for Shakespeare: The End of the Authorship Question. Westport CT: Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-313-36177-7. Bate, Jonathan (1998). The Genius of Shakespeare. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-512823-9. Retrieved 20 December 2010. Shapiro, James (2010). Contested Will: Who Wrote Shakespeare?. London: UK edition: Faber and Faber. ISBN 9781439170229. Retrieved 14 January 2011.
  • Griffiths 1820, pp. 61–63 Griffiths, G.E., ed. (1820). The Monthly Review, or Literary Journal. London: A. and R. Spottiswoode. pp. 61–63.
  • Rawlings, P. (2005). Henry James and the Abuse of the Past. Springer. p. 180. ISBN 9780230504967.
  • Greenblatt 2016, p. 85 Greenblatt, Stephen (6 October 2016). Will in the World: How Shakespeare Became Shakespeare. Bodley Head. ISBN 978-1-84792-452-0.

doi.org

donnanmurphy.com

independent.co.uk

jstor.org

kings-school.co.uk

kirkusreviews.com

marlovian.com

marlowe-society.org

marloweshakespeare.info

myzen.co.uk

rey.myzen.co.uk

news.google.com

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

shake-scene.com

spectator.co.uk

sussex.ac.uk

theguardian.com

themarlowestudies.org

vulture.com

web.archive.org

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

  • The publication of Marlovian Peter Farey's article Marlowe's Sudden and Fearful End (Farey 2005), in which there was no mention of Shakespeare at all, signalled a shift of emphasis which is evident in the Introduction to Daryl Pinksen's Marlowe's Ghost (Pinksen 2008, p. xix). See also Rosalind Barber's lecture on her doctoral research, Rethinking Shakespeare Archived 7 September 2012 at the Wayback Machine, published by the University of Sussex. Farey, Peter (2005). "Marlowe's Sudden and Fearful End: Self-Defence, Murder or Fake?". The Marlowe Society Research Journal (2): 27–60. ISSN 1745-591X. Retrieved 30 April 2015. Pinksen, Daryl (2008). Marlowe's Ghost: The Blacklisting of the Man Who Was Shakespeare. New York: iUniverse. ISBN 978-0-595-47514-8.
  • Kerrigan 1986, p. 11. For a discussion of how such approaches have changed over time, see Pinksen 2004, pp. 14–27. Kerrigan, John (1986). The Sonnets and A Lover's Complaint, by William Shakespeare. London: Penguin Books. Pinksen, Daryl (2004). "The Origins of the Shakespeare Authorship Debate". The Marlowe Society Research Journal (1): 14–27. ISSN 1745-591X.