Mixed economy (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Mixed economy" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
3rd place
3rd place
1st place
1st place
40th place
58th place
6th place
6th place
1,135th place
859th place
3,341st place
2,191st place
low place
low place
5th place
5th place
105th place
79th place
281st place
448th place
3,298th place
4,638th place
12th place
11th place
565th place
460th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
9,905th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
803rd place
826th place

alphahistory.com

amazon.com

archive.org

  • Stilwell, Frank J. B. (2006). Political Economy: The Contest of Economic Ideas (2 ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780195551273. Retrieved 12 November 2018.[need quotation to verify]
  • Mander, Jerry (2012). The Capitalism Papers: Fatal Flaws of an Obsolete System. Counterpoint. pp. 213–217. ISBN 978-1582437170.

books.google.com

britannica.com

  • Young, Greg. "Mixed Economy". Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Retrieved 30 December 2021. Alternatively, a mixed economy can emerge when a socialist government makes exceptions to the rule of state ownership to capture economic benefits from private ownership and free-market incentives. A combination of free market principles of private contracting and socialist principles of state ownership or planning is common to all mixed economies.
  • "Laissez-faire" Archived 1 October 2019 at the Wayback Machine. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. 2 March 2021. Retrieved 14 October 2022.
  • "social democracy". Encyclopedia Britannica. Archived from the original on 27 August 2015. Retrieved 30 October 2021.
  • "Mixed economy". Britannica.com. Retrieved 5 February 2022.

cebc.org.br

  • Batson, Andrew (March 2017). "The State of the State Sector" Archived 12 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine. Gavekal Dragonomics. p. 4. Retrieved 19 August 2020. "While some may find these estimates low, they are not. Even in the statist 1960s–70s, SOEs in France and the UK did not account for more than 15–20% of capital formation; in the 1980s the developed-nation average was around 8%, and it dropped below 5% in the 1990s. SOEs' role in China is many times larger."

eastasiaforum.org

investopedia.com

marxists.org

  • Mattick, Paul (1969). "State-Capitalism and The Mixed Economi". The Limits of the Mixed Economy. Boston, Massachusetts: Extending Horizons Books/Porter Sargent Publisher. Retrieved 17 January 2014 – via Marxists Internet Archive. To be sure, 'orthodox Marxism' maintains that the mixed economy is still the capitalism of old, just as 'orthodox' bourgeois theory insists that the mixed economy is a camouflaged form of socialism. Generally, however, both the state-capitalist and mixed economies are recognized as economic systems adhering to the principle of progress by way of capital accumulation.

mofcom.gov.cn

english.mofcom.gov.cn

  • "Socialist Market Economic System". Ministry of Commerce of the People's Republic of China. 25 June 2004. Retrieved 8 February 2018. The development of the economic system with public ownership playing a dominant role and diverse forms of ownership developing side by side is a basic characteristic of the socialist economic system at the preliminary stage. This is decided by the quality of socialism and the national situation in the preliminary stage: first, China, as a socialist country, should persist in public ownership as the base of the socialist economy; second, China, as in its preliminary stage, should develop diverse forms of ownership on condition that the public ownership plays a dominant role

theguardian.com

u-s-history.com

umass.edu

peri.umass.edu

  • Pollin, Robert (2007). "Resurrection of the Rentier" Archived 12 April 2019 at the Wayback Machine (July–August). Book review of Andrew Glyn's Capitalism Unleashed: Finance, Globalization, and Welfare. In New Left Review (46): 141–142. "The underlying premise behind the mixed economy was straightforward. Keynes and like-minded reformers were not willing to give up on capitalism, and in particular, two of its basic features: that ownership and control of the economy's means of production would remain primarily in the hands of private capitalists; and that most economic activity would be guided by 'market forces', that is, the dynamic combination of material self-seeking and competition. More specifically, the driving force of the mixed economy, as with free-market capitalism, should continue to be capitalists trying to make as much profit as they can. At the same time, Keynes was clear that in maintaining a profit-driven marketplace, it was also imperative to introduce policy interventions to counteract capitalism's inherent tendencies—demonstrated to devastating effect during the 1930s calamity—toward financial breakdowns, depressions, and mass unemployment. Keynes's framework also showed how full employment and social welfare interventions could be justified not simply on grounds of social uplift, but could also promote the stability of capitalism."

usembassy.de

usa.usembassy.de

vatican.va

vaticannews.va

web.archive.org

whatnextjournal.co.uk

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

yale.edu

economics.yale.edu