National debt of the United States (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "National debt of the United States" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
low place
low place
2,954th place
1,848th place
7,014th place
4,338th place
7th place
7th place
79th place
65th place
1,996th place
1,728th place
low place
low place
446th place
308th place
505th place
410th place
142nd place
363rd place
140th place
115th place
3,855th place
2,506th place
5th place
5th place
220th place
155th place
2,544th place
2,456th place
228th place
158th place
2,493rd place
1,714th place
49th place
47th place
264th place
249th place
low place
low place
89th place
147th place
3,654th place
2,142nd place
99th place
77th place
28th place
26th place
960th place
854th place
137th place
101st place
92nd place
72nd place
34th place
27th place
476th place
282nd place
54th place
48th place
108th place
80th place
216th place
186th place
2,666th place
1,519th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
3,208th place
1,803rd place
2,367th place
1,825th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
30th place
24th place
5,122nd place
low place
7,958th place
5,250th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
433rd place
284th place
529th place
314th place
3,341st place
2,191st place
210th place
157th place
2,088th place
1,251st place
low place
low place
low place
low place
4,267th place
2,626th place
low place
low place
3,619th place
2,621st place
low place
low place
702nd place
520th place
1,360th place
845th place
2,465th place
1,383rd place
776th place
844th place
low place
low place
1,668th place
1,164th place
3rd place
3rd place
18th place
17th place
2nd place
2nd place
68th place
117th place
4,514th place
3,901st place
low place
low place
3,498th place
1,889th place
2,728th place
1,571st place
272nd place
225th place
730th place
468th place
758th place
500th place
634th place
432nd place

about.com

useconomy.about.com

usliberals.about.com

archives.gov

obamawhitehouse.archives.gov

  • "Historical Tables – Table 1.2 – Summary of Receipts, Outlays, and Surpluses or Deficits (-) as Percentages of GDP: 1930–2017" (PDF). Office of Management and Budget. Retrieved April 16, 2012.
  • Table 1.1 – Summary of Receipts, Outlays, and Surpluses or Deficits (-): 1789–2017 Archived July 6, 2012, at the Wayback Machine, Whitehouse.gov; accessed August 24, 2016.
  • "Table 7.1 – Federal Debt at the End of Year: 1940–2016". Historical Tables. Office of Management and Budget. Retrieved May 16, 2011.

trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov

arquivo.pt

  • United States Department of Commerce, United States Census Bureau (February 19, 2006). Archived copy at the Portuguese Web Archive (July 10, 2009).. U.S. Census Bureau [website]; retrieved January 30, 2011.

bea.gov

bepress.com

works.bepress.com

bis.org

bloomberg.com

books.google.com

  • "...the total figure will likely be equal to the $5 trillion national debt. In short, one quarter to one third of all military spending since World War II has been devoted to nuclear weapons and their infrastructure ..." p. 33, Steven I. Schwartz; Nuclear Weapons Cost Study Committee (November 1995). "Four Trillion Dollars and Counting". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 51 (6). Educational Foundation for Nuclear Science, Inc.: 32–53. Bibcode:1995BuAtS..51f..32S. doi:10.1080/00963402.1995.11658102. ISSN 0096-3402. Retrieved August 24, 2016.

businessinsider.com

businessinsider.in

cbo.gov

cbpp.org

cbsnews.com

cepr.net

cepr.org

cia.gov

cirad.fr

hal.cirad.fr

cnbc.com

cnet.com

cnn.com

money.cnn.com

  • Barr, Colin (September 7, 2008). "Paulson readies the 'bazooka'", CNN.com; retrieved January 17, 2011.
  • "... Should Americans be concerned that China has started dumping some of its Treasury holdings? After all, it raises serious questions about whether China will keep lending Washington money to help finance the federal deficit in the future.": From "China is dumping U.S. debt", CNN.com, September 11, 2015.

concordcoalition.org

congress.gov

crsreports.congress.gov

crfb.org

csis.org

chinapower.csis.org

dmarron.com

doi.org

  • "...the total figure will likely be equal to the $5 trillion national debt. In short, one quarter to one third of all military spending since World War II has been devoted to nuclear weapons and their infrastructure ..." p. 33, Steven I. Schwartz; Nuclear Weapons Cost Study Committee (November 1995). "Four Trillion Dollars and Counting". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 51 (6). Educational Foundation for Nuclear Science, Inc.: 32–53. Bibcode:1995BuAtS..51f..32S. doi:10.1080/00963402.1995.11658102. ISSN 0096-3402. Retrieved August 24, 2016.

economicoutlook.net

bilbo.economicoutlook.net

europa.eu

epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu

fas.org

fas.org

sgp.fas.org

federalreserve.gov

forbes.com

fortune.com

ft.com

blogs.ft.com

gao.gov

gpo.gov

harvard.edu

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

  • "...the total figure will likely be equal to the $5 trillion national debt. In short, one quarter to one third of all military spending since World War II has been devoted to nuclear weapons and their infrastructure ..." p. 33, Steven I. Schwartz; Nuclear Weapons Cost Study Committee (November 1995). "Four Trillion Dollars and Counting". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 51 (6). Educational Foundation for Nuclear Science, Inc.: 32–53. Bibcode:1995BuAtS..51f..32S. doi:10.1080/00963402.1995.11658102. ISSN 0096-3402. Retrieved August 24, 2016.

house.gov

budget.house.gov

htisec.com

imf.org

kyodonews.net

english.kyodonews.net

measuringworth.com

moslereconomics.com

  • "... The Chinese buy U.S. T-securities by transferring U.S. dollars (not yuan) from their checking account at the Federal Reserve Bank to China's T-security account, also at the Federal Reserve Bank. When[ever] the Chinese redeem those T-securities, the money is transferred back to China's checking account at the Fed. During the entire purchase and redemption process, the dollars never leave the Fed." "What Policies for Global Prosperity?" by Warren Mosler, September 23, 2010.

nbcnews.com

npr.org

nytimes.com

nytimes.com

krugman.blogs.nytimes.com

takingnote.blogs.nytimes.com

oecd.org

stats.oecd.org

pgpf.org

pimco.com

politifact.com

reuters.com

reuters.com

blogs.reuters.com

rollcall.com

senate.gov

ssa.gov

state.gov

fpc.state.gov

statista.com

stlouisfed.org

fred.stlouisfed.org

research.stlouisfed.org

telegraph.co.uk

the-privateer.com

theatlantic.com

thefiscaltimes.com

thehill.com

thenation.com

  • : "... What about indebtedness to foreigners? ... To acquire [U.S. gov't bonds], China must export goods to us, not offset by equivalent imports. That is a cost to China. It's a cost Beijing is prepared to pay, for its own reasons: export industries promote learning, technology transfer and product quality improvement, and they provide jobs to migrants from the countryside. But that's China's business. For China, the bonds themselves are a sterile hoard. There is almost nothing that Beijing can do with them; ... its stock of T-bonds will just go on growing. And we will pay interest on it, not with real effort but by typing numbers into computers. There is no burden associated with this; not now and not later." From "In Defense of Deficits" by James K. Galbraith, The Nation, March 4, 2010.

treas.gov

fms.treas.gov

treasury.gov

fiscaldata.treasury.gov

ticdata.treasury.gov

fiscal.treasury.gov

treasury.gov

treasurydirect.gov

ucsc.edu

www2.ucsc.edu

umass.edu

peri.umass.edu

upenn.edu

budgetmodel.wharton.upenn.edu

usdebtclock.org

usnews.com

washingtonexaminer.com

washingtonpost.com

web.archive.org

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

wsj.com

wsj.com

professional.wsj.com

online.wsj.com