Natural number (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Natural number" in English language version.

Last modified:

Ref.Un. Ref.Website
Global rank English rank
3rd place
3rd place
6th place
6th place
2nd place
2nd place
1,053rd place
1,274th place
1st place
1st place
1,091st place
1,169th place
63rd place
47th place
23rd place
15th place
61st place
357th place
434th place
249th place
5th place
5th place
7,049th place
5,456th place
low place
low place
6,606th place
4,067th place
5,954th place
3,036th place
82nd place
41st place
low place
low place
4th place
4th place
1,979th place
1,265th place
low place
low place
1,190th place
1,097th place

acta.hu (Global: low place; English: low place)

ams.org (Global: 434th place; English: 249th place)

mathscinet.ams.org

archive.org (Global: 6th place; English: 6th place)

bnf.fr (Global: 61st place; English: 357th place)

gallica.bnf.fr

books.google.com (Global: 3rd place; English: 3rd place)

digizeitschriften.de (Global: low place; English: low place)

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; English: 2nd place)

en.wikisource.org (Global: 82nd place; English: 41st place)

encyclopediaofmath.org (Global: 7,049th place; English: 5,456th place)

google.com.au (Global: 5,954th place; English: 3,036th place)

books.google.com.au

hup.harvard.edu (Global: 6,606th place; English: 4,067th place)

iso.org (Global: 1,190th place; English: 1,097th place)

iteh.ai (Global: low place; English: low place)

cdn.standards.iteh.ai

jstor.org (Global: 23rd place; English: 15th place)

  • Benacerraf (1965), p. 70: "To be the number 3 is no more and no less than to be preceded by 2, 1, and possibly 0, and to be followed by 4, 5, and so forth ... Any object can play the role of 3; that is, any object can be the third element in some progression. What is peculiar to 3 is that it defines that role  not by being a paradigm of any object which plays it, but by representing the relation that any third member of a progression bears to the rest of the progression." Benacerraf, Paul (January 1965). "What Numbers Could not Be". The Philosophical Review. 74: 47–73. JSTOR 2183530.
  • Peirce, C. S. (1881). "On the Logic of Number". American Journal of Mathematics. 4 (1): 85–95. doi:10.2307/2369151. JSTOR 2369151. MR 1507856.

loc.gov (Global: 63rd place; English: 47th place)

lccn.loc.gov

  • Hamilton (1988), pp. 117 ff calls them "Peano's Postulates" and begins with "1.  0 is a natural number."
    Halmos (1966), p. 46 uses the language of set theory instead of the language of arithmetic for his five axioms. He begins with "(I)  0 ∈ ω (where, of course, 0 = ∅" (ω is the set of all natural numbers).
    Morash (1991), Section 10.1: An Axiomatization for the System of Positive Integers gives "a two-part axiom" in which the natural numbers begin with 1. Hamilton, A. G. (1988). Logic for Mathematicians (Revised ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-36865-0. Halmos, Paul (1966). Naive Set Theory. Princeton: Van Nostrand. LCCN 60-11059. Morash, Ronald P. (1991). Bridge to Abstract Mathematics: Mathematical proof and structures (2nd ed.). Mcgraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-043043-3.
  • Quine (1960), pp. 262–263, says the only thing required of an acceptable description of natural numbers is that they form a progression and so "any progression  i.e., any infinite series each of whose members has only finitely many precursors  will do nicely". Quine, Willard (1960). Word and Object. Technology Press (MIT). LCCN 60-9621.

msu.edu (Global: 1,979th place; English: 1,265th place)

archive.lib.msu.edu

nih.gov (Global: 5th place; English: 5th place)

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

st-andrews.ac.uk (Global: 1,053rd place; English: 1,274th place)

mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; English: 1st place)

wolfram.com (Global: 1,091st place; English: 1,169th place)

mathworld.wolfram.com

functions.wolfram.com

worldcat.org (Global: 4th place; English: 4th place)

search.worldcat.org

  • Kirby, Laurie; Paris, Jeff (1982). "Accessible Independence Results for Peano Arithmetic". Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society. 14 (4). Wiley: 285–293. doi:10.1112/blms/14.4.285. ISSN 0024-6093.