New Testament (English Wikipedia)

See, for example, Raddatz, Tom (26 October 2000). "A Response to the Oneness-Trinity Debate". 1Lord1Faith.org. Archived from the original on 20 March 2005.

adventistarchives.org

documents.adventistarchives.org

White, E. G. (1 April 1890). "Repentance the Gift of God" (PDF). Advent Review and Sabbath Herald. 67 (13): 193–94. Retrieved 30 December 2020. Several have written to me, inquiring if the message of justification by faith is the third angel's message, and I have answered, "it is the third angel's message in verity." ... Brightness, glory, and power are to be connected with the third angel's message, and conviction will follow wherever it is preached in demonstration of the Spirit.

anglicansonline.org

"Articles of Religion". Anglicans Online. Retrieved 19 November 2010.

archive.org

Lindberg, Carter (2006). A Brief History of Christianity. Blackwell Publishing. p. 15. ISBN 978-1-4051-1078-5.
Kümmel, Werner Georg (1975). Introduction to the New Testament. Translated by Kee, Howard Clark (English translation of revised 17th ed.). Nashville: Abdingdon Press. ISBN 0-687-19575-6.
Fitzmyer, Joseph A. (1981). The Gospel according to Luke (I–IX). Anchor Bible. Vol. 28 (2nd ed.). New York: Doubleday. pp. 35–53. ISBN 0-385-00515-6.
Roetzel, Calvin J. (2009). The Letters of Paul: Conversations in Context (5th ed.). Louisville, Kentucky: Westminster John Knox. p. ix–x ISBN 978-0-664-23392-1
Ehrman 2004a, p. 323: "Scholars in the ancient world went about detecting forgeries in much the same way that modern scholars do. They looked to see whether the ideas and writing style of a piece conformed with those used by the author in other writings, and they examined the text for any blatant anachronisms, that is, statements about things that could not have existed at the time the alleged author was writing (like the letter reputedly from an early seventeenth-century American colonist that mentions "the United States")- Arguments of this kind were used by some Christian scholars of the third century to show that Hebrews was not written by Paul or the Book of Revelation by John the son of Zebedee. Modern scholars, as we will see, concur with these judgments. To be sure, neither of these books can be considered a forgery. Hebrews does not claim to be written by Paul (it is anonymous), and the John who wrote Revelation does not claim to be the son of Zebedee (it is therefore homonymous). Are there other books in the New Testament, though, that can be considered forgeries?" Ehrman, Bart D. (2004a) [1997]. The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-515462-2.
Powell 2009, pp. 431–32. Powell, Mark A. (2009). Introducing the New Testament: A Historical, Literary, and Theological Survey. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Academic. ISBN 978-0-8010-2868-7.
Fornberg, Tord (1977). An Early Church in a Pluralistic Society: A Study of 2 Peter (Thesis). Coniectanea Biblica, New Testament Series 9. Translated by Gray, Jean. Lund: Gleerup. p. 14. ISBN 9789140044372. OCLC 1244729487.
Powell 2009, p. 16. Powell, Mark A. (2009). Introducing the New Testament: A Historical, Literary, and Theological Survey. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker Academic. ISBN 978-0-8010-2868-7.
Ehrman 2004b, p. 110: "In fact, contrary to what you might think, these Gospels don't even claim to be written by eyewitnesses." Ehrman, Bart D. (2004b). Truth and Fiction in The Da Vinci Code: A Historian Reveals What We Really Know about Jesus, Mary Magdalene, and Constantine. Oxford University Press, US. ISBN 978-0-19-534616-9.
Ehrman 2006, p. 143: "The Gospels of the New Testament are therefore our earliest accounts. These do not claim to be written by eyewitnesses to the life of Jesus, and historians have long recognized that they were produced by second- or third-generation Christians living in different countries than Jesus (and Judas) did, speaking a different language (Greek instead of Aramaic), experiencing different situations, and addressing different audiences." Ehrman, Bart D. (2006). The Lost Gospel of Judas Iscariot: A New Look at Betrayer and Betrayed. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-971104-8.
Ehrman 2006, p. 143. Ehrman, Bart D. (2006). The Lost Gospel of Judas Iscariot: A New Look at Betrayer and Betrayed. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-971104-8.
Ehrman 2009, pp. 102–04. Ehrman, Bart D. (2009). Jesus, Interrupted: Revealing the Hidden Contradictions in the Bible (and Why We Don't Know About Them). New York: Harper Collins. ISBN 978-0-06-117393-6.
Meier, John P. (1991). A Marginal Jew. Vol. 2. New York: Doubleday. pp. 955–56. ISBN 978-0-385-46993-7.
Helms, Randel (1997). Who Wrote the Gospels?. Altadena, California: Millennium Press. p. 8. ISBN 978-0-9655047-2-0.
See Knox 1948, pp. 2–15 for detailed arguments. Knox, Wilfred L. (1948). The Acts of the Apostles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bruce 1952, p. 2. Bruce, F. F. (1952) [1951]. The Acts of the Apostles: The Greek Text with Introduction and Commentary (2nd ed.). London: Tyndale Press. OCLC 1244214359.
Guthrie 1990, p. 621–622. Guthrie, Donald (1990). New Testament Introduction (4th (revised) ed.). Downers Grove, Illinois: InterVarsity Press. ISBN 0-85111-761-9.
Ehrman 2004a, p. 385. Ehrman, Bart D. (2004a) [1997]. The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-515462-2.
Ehrman 2004a, p. 323 Ehrman, Bart D. (2004a) [1997]. The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-515462-2.
Zahn, S. T. (1909). Introduction to the New Testament. Vol. II. Translated by Trout, John Moore; Mather, William Arnot; Hodous, Louis; Worcester, Edward Strong; Worrell, William Hoyt; Dodge, Rowland Backus (English translation of 3rd German ed.). New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. p. 250.
Bigg, Charles (1902) [1901]. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistles of St. Peter and St. Jude. The International Critical Commentary (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: T&T Clark. ISBN 9780567050366.
Ehrman 2004a, pp. 479–480. Ehrman, Bart D. (2004a) [1997]. The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-515462-2.
Brown 1997, pp. 456–466. Brown, Raymond E. (1997). An Introduction to the New Testament. Anchor Bible. New York: Doubleday. ISBN 9780385247672. OCLC 1035750767.
Metzger & Ehrman 2005. Metzger, Bruce M.; Ehrman, Bart D. (2005) [1964]. The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. OCLC 1245822346.
Machen 1998, p. 5. Machen, John Gresham (1998) [1923]. The New Testament Greek for Beginners. ISBN 978-1579101800.
Machen 1998, p. 4. Machen, John Gresham (1998) [1923]. The New Testament Greek for Beginners. ISBN 978-1579101800.
Gamble, Harry Y. (1985). The New Testament Canon: Its Making and Meaning. Philadelphia: Fortress. ISBN 9780800604707. OCLC 1194914119.
Ferguson 2002, p. 301ff. Ferguson, Everett (2002). "Factors leading to the Selection and Closure of the New Testament Canon". In McDonald, L. M.; Sanders, J. A. (eds.). The Canon Debate. Hendrickson. ISBN 978-1-4412-4163-4.
McDonald & Sanders 2002, p. 277. McDonald, Lee M; Sanders, James A., eds. (2002). The Canon Debate. Peadbody, Massachusetts: Hendrickson. ISBN 1-56563-517-5.
McDonald & Sanders 2002, Appendix D-2, note 19: "Revelation was added later in 419 at the subsequent synod of Carthage." McDonald, Lee M; Sanders, James A., eds. (2002). The Canon Debate. Peadbody, Massachusetts: Hendrickson. ISBN 1-56563-517-5.
Ferguson 2002, p. 320. Ferguson, Everett (2002). "Factors leading to the Selection and Closure of the New Testament Canon". In McDonald, L. M.; Sanders, J. A. (eds.). The Canon Debate. Hendrickson. ISBN 978-1-4412-4163-4.
Metzger 1987, pp. 237–238. Metzger, Bruce M. (1987). The Canon of the New Testament: Its Origins, Development, and Significance. Oxford: Clarendon. ISBN 0-19-826180-2.
McDonald & Sanders 2002, Appendix D-2, note 19 McDonald, Lee M; Sanders, James A., eds. (2002). The Canon Debate. Peadbody, Massachusetts: Hendrickson. ISBN 1-56563-517-5.
McDonald & Sanders 2002, pp. 414–415. McDonald, Lee M; Sanders, James A., eds. (2002). The Canon Debate. Peadbody, Massachusetts: Hendrickson. ISBN 1-56563-517-5.
For the initial dating of P52, see Roberts 1935 and Bell & Skeat 1935. Though see now Nongbri 2005 and Martinez 2009. Roberts, C. H., ed. (1935). An Unpublished Fragment of the Fourth Gospel in the John Rylands Library. Manchester: Manchester University Press. OCLC 1245905274. Bell, H. Idris; Skeat, T. C. (1935). Fragments of an Unknown Gospel and Other Early Christian Papyri. London: Trustees of the British Museum. Nongbri, Brent (2005). "The Use and Abuse of P52: Papyrological Pitfalls in the Dating of the Fourth Gospel". Harvard Theological Review. 98: 23–52. doi:10.1017/S0017816005000842. S2CID 163128006. Martinez, David G. (2009). "The Papyri and Early Christianity". In Bagnall, Roger S. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Papyrology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 590–623.
Ehrman 2005, p. 46. Ehrman, Bart D. (2005). Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why. HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-06-073817-4.
Ehrman 2005, p. 265. Ehrman, Bart D. (2005). Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why. HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-06-073817-4.
Ehrman 2005, p. 80-83: "on one condition: that his opponents produce a Greeks manuscript in which the verse could be found (finding it in Latin manuscripts was not enough). And so a Greek manuscript was produced. In fact, it was produced for the occasion. It appears that someone copied out the Greek text of the Epistles, and when he came to the passage in question, he translated the Latin text into Greek, giving the Johannine Comma in its familiar, theologically useful form. The manuscript provided to Erasmus, in other words, was a sixteenthcentury production, made to order." Ehrman, Bart D. (2005). Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why. HarperCollins. ISBN 978-0-06-073817-4.
Parvis, M. M. (1962). "Text, [New Testament]". In Buttrick, George A.; Kepler, Thomas S.; Knox, John; May, Herbert Gordon; Terrien, Samuel; Bucke, Emory Stevens (eds.). The Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible: An Illustrated Encyclopedia. Vol. 4 (R–Z). Nashville: Abingdon Press. p. 595. ISBN 978-0-687-19273-1.
Achtemeier, Paul (1985). Harper's Bible dictionary. San Francisco: Harper & Row. p. 129. ISBN 0060698632.
Võõbus 1954, pp. 1–128, 211–240. Võõbus, Arthur (1954). Early Versions of the New Testament. Papers of the Estonian Theological Society in Exile. Vol. 6. Stockholm.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
Võõbus 1954, pp. 216–229. Võõbus, Arthur (1954). Early Versions of the New Testament. Papers of the Estonian Theological Society in Exile. Vol. 6. Stockholm.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
Võõbus 1954, pp. 229–237; Metzger 1977, pp. 99–152. Võõbus, Arthur (1954). Early Versions of the New Testament. Papers of the Estonian Theological Society in Exile. Vol. 6. Stockholm.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) Metzger, Bruce M. (1977). The Early Versions of the New Testament. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
On the Armenian, Georgian, Ethiopic, Arabic, and Gothic, see Võõbus 1954, pp. 133–210, 243–309 Võõbus, Arthur (1954). Early Versions of the New Testament. Papers of the Estonian Theological Society in Exile. Vol. 6. Stockholm.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
Equipped for Every Good Work (PDF). Brooklyn, New York: Watchtower Bible and Tract Society & International Bible Students Association. 1946. pp. 12–13.
Ludlow, Daniel H., ed. (1992). Encyclopedia of Mormonism. Vol. 1. New York: Macmillan. pp. 106–107. ISBN 0-02-879600-4.
Paulsen, David Lamont; Musser, Donald W. (2007). Mormonism in Dialogue with Contemporary Christian Theologies. Mercer University Press. p. 277. ISBN 978-0-88146-083-4.

atoday.com

McLarty, John (15 November 2001). "The Adventist Theological Society". Adventist Today. Archived from the original on 25 December 2007.

bbc.co.uk

"BBC – Religions – Christianity: The Bible". www.bbc.co.uk. Retrieved 23 September 2020.

beitsimcha.org

"Our Beliefs". Beit Simcha. Retrieved 7 June 2012. To study the whole and authoritative Word of God, including the Tenach (Hebrew Scriptures) and the B'rit Chadasha (New Covenant) under the leading of the Holy Spirit.

bible-researcher.com

"The meaning of "Covenant" (διαθηκη) in the Bible". www.bible-researcher.com. Retrieved 12 August 2020.
"Web Directory: German Bible Versions". Bible Research. Retrieved 17 February 2016.
"Luther's Antilegomena". www.bible-researcher.com. Retrieved 15 July 2020.

bible.org

Wallace, Daniel B. (28 June 2004). "Hebrews: Introduction, Argument, and Outline". Bible.org.

net.bible.org

"NETBible: John 7". Bible.org. Retrieved 17 October 2009. See note 139 on that page.

biblegateway.com

biblehub.com

For example, the pact between Jacob with Laban in Genesis (Genesis 31:44).
For example, the covenant at Mount Sinai (Exodus 19:5) or the "new covenant" verse from Jeremiah 31:31 above (Jeremiah 31:31).
Definition of ברית in Brown-Driver-Briggs's lexicon: https://biblehub.com/hebrew/1285.htm Hebrew uses an unrelated word for testament: tsavaa (צַוָּאָה).
"Acts 1:1".

biblestudytools.com

Meadors, Gary T. (1997). "Scripture, Unity and Diversity of". In Elwell, Walter A. (ed.). Baker's Evangelical Dictionary of Biblical Theology. Grand Rapids: Baker Books.

biblica.com

Colossians 2:14

biblicalstudies.org.uk

e.g. Green, E. M. B. (8 July 1960). 2 Peter Reconsidered (PDF) (Speech). Meeting of the Tyndale Fellowship for Biblical Research. Cambridge. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 August 2020.

blueletterbible.org

"G1242 – diathēkē – Strong's Greek Lexicon (KJV)". Blue Letter Bible. Retrieved 12 August 2020.

books.google.com

Ehrman 1997, p. 8: "The New Testament contains twenty-seven books, written in Greek, by fifteen or sixteen different authors, who were addressing other Christian individuals or communities between the years 50 and 120 C.E. (see box 1.4). As we will see, it is difficult to know whether any of these books was written by Jesus' own disciples." Ehrman, Bart D. (1997). The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-508481-8.
Harris 2010, p. 20: Dates Jude and 2 Peter to 130–150 AD. Harris, Stephen L. (2010). Understanding The Bible. McGraw-Hill Education. ISBN 978-0-07-340744-9.
Harris 1980, p. 295: Virtually no authorities defend the Petrine authorship of 2 Peter, which is believed to have been written by an anonymous churchman in Rome about 150 C.E. Harris, Stephen L. (1980). Understanding the Bible: A Reader's Guide and Reference. Mayfield Pub. Co. ISBN 978-0-87484-472-6.
Cousland 2018, p. 1380. Cousland, J.R.C. (1 March 2018). Coogan, Michael David; Brettler, Marc Zvi; Newsom, Carol Ann; Perkins, Pheme (eds.). The New Oxford Annotated Bible: New Revised Standard Version. Oxford University Press. p. 1380. ISBN 978-0-19-027605-8.
ESV Study Bible. Wheaton, IL: Crossway. 2008. p. 2073. ISBN 978-1-4335-0241-5. Archived from the original on 21 March 2023.
ESV Study Bible. Wheaton, IL: Crossway. 2008. p. 1935. ISBN 978-1-4335-0241-5. Archived from the original on 21 March 2023.
Burkett 2002, p. 196. Burkett, Delbert (2002). An Introduction to the New Testament and the Origins of Christianity. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-00720-7.
Ehrman 2003, p. 235 Ehrman, Bart D. (2003). Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture and the Faiths We Never Knew. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-518249-1.
Perkins 2009, pp. 250–53. Perkins, Pheme (2009). Introduction to the Synoptic Gospels. Eerdmans. ISBN 978-0-8028-6553-3.
Lightfoot, Joseph Barber (1866). St Paul's Epistle to the Galatians (2nd ed.). MacMillan & Co. p. 217.
Mounce, Robert (1998). The Book of Revelation (revised ed.). The New International Commentary on the New Testament Series. Cambridge, UK: Eerdmans. pp. 15–16. ISBN 0-8028-2537-0.
Nersessian 2001, p. 29. Nersessian, Vrej (2001). "The Armenian Canon of the New Testament". The Bible in the Armenian Tradition. Los Angeles, CA: J. Paul Getty Museum. ISBN 978-0-89236-640-8.
Poole, Matthew (1852). "Annotations Upon the Holy Bible, Vol. III". Robert Carter and Brothers. p. 729.
Ehrman 2003, p. 235: "The four Gospels that eventually made it into the New Testament, for example, are all anonymous, written in the third person about Jesus and his companions. None of them contains a first-person narrative ('One day, when Jesus and I went into Capernaum...'), or claims to be written by an eyewitness or companion of an eyewitness. ... Some scholars abandon these traditional identifications, and recognize that the books were written by otherwise unknown but relatively well-educated Greek-speaking (and writing) Christians during the second half of the first century." Ehrman, Bart D. (2003). Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture and the Faiths We Never Knew. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-518249-1.
Nickle, Keith Fullerton (2001). The Synoptic Gospels: An Introduction. Westminster John Knox Press. p. 43. ISBN 978-0-664-22349-6.
Barnes, Albert (1962) [1832]. Barnes' Notes on the New Testament. Kregel Publications. p. 360. ISBN 978-0825493713.
Brown 1988, p. 9. Brown, Raymond E. (1988). The Gospel and Epistles of John: A Concise Commentary. Liturgical Press. ISBN 978-0-8146-1283-5.
Schubert 2016, p. 16. Schubert, Judith (2016). The Gospel of John: Question by Question. Wipf & Stock Publishers. ISBN 978-1-5326-0727-1.
Harner, Philip B. (2004). What Are They Saying About the Catholic Epistles?. Paulist Press. p. 49. ISBN 978-0-8091-4188-3.
Spitta, Friedrich (1885). Der zweite Brief des Petrus und der Brief des Judas: Eine geschichtliche Untersuchung [The Second Epistle of Peter and the Epistle of Jude: A Historical Investigation] (in German). Halle an der Saale: Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses..
Van der Watt 2008, p. 1. Van der Watt, Jan (2008). An Introduction to the Johannine Gospel and Letters. Bloomsbury. ISBN 978-0-567-52174-3.
Harris 2006, p. 479. Harris, Stephen L. (2006). Understanding the Bible (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-296548-3.
Lincoln 2005, p. 18. Lincoln, Andrew (2005). Gospel According to St John: Black's New Testament Commentaries. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 978-1-4411-8822-9.
Burkett 2002, p. 214. Burkett, Delbert (2002). An Introduction to the New Testament and the Origins of Christianity. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-00720-7.
Lindars, Edwards & Court 2000, p. 41. Lindars, Barnabas; Edwards, Ruth B.; Court, John M. (2000). The Johannine Literature. Sheffield Academic Press. ISBN 978-1841270814.
Burge 2014, pp. 236–37. Burge, Gary M. (2014). "Gospel of John". In Evans, Craig A. (ed.). The Routledge Encyclopedia of the Historical Jesus. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-317-72224-3.
Ferguson 2002, p. 301ff. Ferguson, Everett (2002). "Factors leading to the Selection and Closure of the New Testament Canon". In McDonald, L. M.; Sanders, J. A. (eds.). The Canon Debate. Hendrickson. ISBN 978-1-4412-4163-4.
Ferguson 2002, p. 320. Ferguson, Everett (2002). "Factors leading to the Selection and Closure of the New Testament Canon". In McDonald, L. M.; Sanders, J. A. (eds.). The Canon Debate. Hendrickson. ISBN 978-1-4412-4163-4.
Ware, Kallistos (1993). "Holy Tradition: The Source of the Orthodox Faith".The Orthodox Church. Penguin UK.
White, Ellen (2015). Patriarchs and Prophets. Start Publishing LLC. p. 365.
Givens, Terry L. (2015). The Oxford Handbook of Mormonism. Oxford University Press. pp. 124–25. ISBN 978-0-19-977836-2.

catholic.com

"New Testament". Catholic Encyclopedia. 1912. Retrieved 16 February 2021 – via Catholic.com.

catholicity.com

"Epistle of St. James". 1914 Catholic Encyclopedia.

ccel.org

Lactantius. "Chapter XX". "The Divine Institutes, Book IV".
Due to its reference to Eleutherus as the current bishop of Rome, the work is usually dated c. 180. Schaff, Philip (2001) [c. 1885] "Introductory Note to Irenæus Against Heresies", Ante-Nicene Fathers, Volume I, Against Heresies, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.
Harnack, Adolf. "Appendix VI". Origin of the New Testament. Christian Classics Ethereal Library.
Irenaeus. "Chapter XI". Against Heresies, Book III. Section 8.

christianheadlines.com

Chismar, Janet (20 June 2001). "Homosexual Ordination Vote Widens Gap Between Presbyterian Factions". Religion Today. Archived from the original on 24 May 2021 – via www.christianheadlines.com.

churchofjesuschrist.org

"Bible, Inerrancy of". The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. 2016. Retrieved 23 May 2016.

doi.org

Jackson, Bernard S. (2013). "Why the Name New Testament?" (PDF). Melilah: Manchester Journal of Jewish Studies. 9 (1): 50–100. doi:10.31826/mjj-2013-090104.
Burris, Catherine; Van Rompay, Lucas (2002). "Thecla in Syriac Christianity: Premliminary Observations". Hugoye: Journal of Syriac Studies. 5 (2). Beth Mardutho: The Syriac Institute: 225–236. doi:10.31826/hug-2010-050112.
Brakke, David (October 1994). "Canon Formation and Social Conflict in Fourth-Century Egypt: Athanasius of Alexandria's Thirty-Ninth Festal Letter". Harvard Theological Review. 87 (4): 395–419. doi:10.1017/S0017816000030200. JSTOR 1509966. S2CID 161779697.
For the initial dating of P52, see Roberts 1935 and Bell & Skeat 1935. Though see now Nongbri 2005 and Martinez 2009. Roberts, C. H., ed. (1935). An Unpublished Fragment of the Fourth Gospel in the John Rylands Library. Manchester: Manchester University Press. OCLC 1245905274. Bell, H. Idris; Skeat, T. C. (1935). Fragments of an Unknown Gospel and Other Early Christian Papyri. London: Trustees of the British Museum. Nongbri, Brent (2005). "The Use and Abuse of P52: Papyrological Pitfalls in the Dating of the Fourth Gospel". Harvard Theological Review. 98: 23–52. doi:10.1017/S0017816005000842. S2CID 163128006. Martinez, David G. (2009). "The Papyri and Early Christianity". In Bagnall, Roger S. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Papyrology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 590–623.
Keith, Chris (2008). "Recent and Previous Research on the Pericope Adulterae (John 7.53–8.11)". Currents in Biblical Research. 6 (3): 377–404. doi:10.1177/1476993X07084793. S2CID 145385075.

earlychristianwritings.com

See also Tertullian, Against Marcion, Book IV, chapters I, II, XIV. His meaning in chapter XX is less clear, and in chapters IX and XL he uses the term to mean 'new covenant'.
Tertullian. "Chapter XIV". Against Marcion, Book III.
Tertullian. "Chapter VI". Against Marcion, Book IV.
Kirby, Peter. "Gospel of Mark". Early Christian Writings. Retrieved 15 January 2008.
"Epistle of James". Early Christian Writings. Retrieved 19 November 2010.

etsjets.org

Kruger, M.J. (1999). "The Authenticity of 2 Peter". Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society. 42 (4): 645–71.

gbgm-umc.org

Carter, Nancy A. (2000). "The Acts of Thecla: A Pauline Tradition Linked to Women". Conflict and Community in the Corinthian Church. Archived from the original on 28 November 2014.

graftedin.com

"Essential Statement of Faith". The Harvest: A Messianic Charismatic Congregation. Archived from the original on 27 November 2015. Retrieved 7 June 2012. We believe that the Torah (five books of Moses) is a comprehensive summary of God's foundational laws and ways, as found in both the Tanakh and Apostolic Scriptures. Additionally, the Bible teaches that without holiness no man can see God. We believe in the Doctrine of Sanctification as a definite, yet progressive work of grace, commencing at the time of regeneration and continuing until the consummation of salvation. Therefore we encourage all believers, both Jews and Gentiles, to affirm, embrace, and practice these foundational laws and ways as clarified through the teachings of Messiah Yeshua.

jstor.org

Brakke, David (October 1994). "Canon Formation and Social Conflict in Fourth-Century Egypt: Athanasius of Alexandria's Thirty-Ninth Festal Letter". Harvard Theological Review. 87 (4): 395–419. doi:10.1017/S0017816000030200. JSTOR 1509966. S2CID 161779697.

looys.net

The growth and development of the Armenian biblical canon is complex; extra-canonical New Testament books appear in historical canon lists and recensions that are either distinct to this tradition, or where they do exist elsewhere, never achieved the same status.^{[citation needed]} Some of the books are not listed in this table; these include the Prayer of Euthalius, the Repose of St. John the Evangelist, the Doctrine of Addai, a reading from the Gospel of James, the Second Apostolic Canons, the Words of Justus, Dionysius Areopagite, the Preaching of Peter, and a Poem by Ghazar.^{[citation needed]} (Various sources^{[citation needed]} also mention undefined Armenian canonical additions to the Gospels of Mark and John. These may refer to the general additions—Mark 16:9–20 and John 7:53–8:11—discussed elsewhere in these notes.) A possible exception here to canonical exclusivity is the Second Apostolic Canons, which share a common source—the Apostolic Constitutions—with certain parts of the Orthodox Tewahedo New Testament broader canon.^{[citation needed]} The Acts of Thaddeus was included in the biblical canon of Gregory of Tatev.^[58] There is some uncertainty about whether Armenian canon lists include the Doctrine of Addai or the related Acts of Thaddeus.^{[citation needed]} Moreover, the correspondence between King Abgar V and Jesus Christ, which is found in various forms—including within both the Doctrine of Addai and the Acts of Thaddeus—sometimes appears separately (see list^{[full citation needed]}). The Prayer of Euthalius and the Repose of St. John the Evangelist appear in the appendix of the 1805 Armenian Zohrab Bible.^{[citation needed]} Some of the aforementioned books, though they are found within canon lists, have nonetheless never been discovered to be part of any Armenian biblical manuscript.^[58]

mechon-mamre.org

Jeremiah 31–34

merriam-webster.com

"Gospel". Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Retrieved 10 May 2016.

mormon.org

"Articles of Faith". The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. Archived from the original on 31 May 2013. Retrieved 17 February 2016.

newadvent.org

"If I fail in resolving this article (of our faith) by passages which may admit of dispute out of the Old Testament, I will take out of the New Testament a confirmation of our view, that you may not straightway attribute to the Father every possible (relation and condition) which I ascribe to the Son." – Tertullian, Against Praxeas 15
Irenaeus, Against Heresies III.11
Eusebius. "Chapter 25". Church History, Book VI.
Eusebius. "Chapter 25". Church History, Book III.
Epistle of Polycarp to the Philippians, Chapter 12
Justin Martyr. First Apology. Chapter 67.
Reid, George (1908). "Canon of the New Testament". The Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.

onenesspentecostal.com

Dulle, Jason. "How We Get Our Bible". Institute for Biblical Studies. Retrieved 15 April 2013.
Dulle, Jason. "Defending the Inerrancy and Canon of Scripture". Institute for Biblical Studies. Retrieved 15 April 2013.
Dulle, Jason. "The Nature of Inspiration". Institute for Biblical Studies. Retrieved 15 April 2013.

oremus.org

bible.oremus.org

reformed.org

"The Chicago Statement of Biblical Inerrancy". Center for Reformed Theology and Apologetics. Retrieved 19 November 2010.

religion-online.org

Spong, John Shelby (26 September 1979). "The Continuing Christian Need for Judaism". Christian Century. p. 918. Archived from the original on 4 June 2011.

scborromeo.org

"The Transmission of Divine Revelation". Catechism of the Catholic Church. 2nd ed. 1997.

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

Brakke, David (October 1994). "Canon Formation and Social Conflict in Fourth-Century Egypt: Athanasius of Alexandria's Thirty-Ninth Festal Letter". Harvard Theological Review. 87 (4): 395–419. doi:10.1017/S0017816000030200. JSTOR 1509966. S2CID 161779697.
For the initial dating of P52, see Roberts 1935 and Bell & Skeat 1935. Though see now Nongbri 2005 and Martinez 2009. Roberts, C. H., ed. (1935). An Unpublished Fragment of the Fourth Gospel in the John Rylands Library. Manchester: Manchester University Press. OCLC 1245905274. Bell, H. Idris; Skeat, T. C. (1935). Fragments of an Unknown Gospel and Other Early Christian Papyri. London: Trustees of the British Museum. Nongbri, Brent (2005). "The Use and Abuse of P52: Papyrological Pitfalls in the Dating of the Fourth Gospel". Harvard Theological Review. 98: 23–52. doi:10.1017/S0017816005000842. S2CID 163128006. Martinez, David G. (2009). "The Papyri and Early Christianity". In Bagnall, Roger S. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Papyrology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 590–623.
Keith, Chris (2008). "Recent and Previous Research on the Pericope Adulterae (John 7.53–8.11)". Currents in Biblical Research. 6 (3): 377–404. doi:10.1177/1476993X07084793. S2CID 145385075.

sqspcdn.com

static1.1.sqspcdn.com

Jackson, Bernard S. (2013). "Why the Name New Testament?" (PDF). Melilah: Manchester Journal of Jewish Studies. 9 (1): 50–100. doi:10.31826/mjj-2013-090104.

ssrn.com

papers.ssrn.com

Bateman, C. G. (3 August 2010). "Origen's Role in the Formation of the New Testament Canon". SSRN 1653073. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)

studylight.org

"Inheritance – Holman Bible Dictionary – Bible Dictionary". StudyLight.org. Retrieved 12 August 2020.
Henry, Matthew (1706). Matthew Henry Complete Commentary on the Whole Bible. StudyLight.org.

trobisch.com

Trobisch, David. "Who Published the New Testament?" (PDF). Free Inquiry. 28 (Dec. 2007/Jan. 2008): 30–33. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 April 2021. ...Acts provides information that makes it possible to identify Luke, the author of the Gospel, as the doctor who travels with Paul and to identify Mark as someone close to Peter and Paul. This 'canon consciousness' suggests that the book of Acts was composed at a later date than is typically thought; this theory is supported by the first attestation of the book around 180 CE.
Trobisch, David (2012). "The New Testament in Light of Book Publishing in Antiquity" (PDF). In Kloppenberg, John S.; Newman, Judith H. (eds.). Editing the Bible: Assessing the Task Past and Present. Resources for Biblical Study. Vol. 69. Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature. pp. 161–170. ISBN 978-1-58983-648-8.

tufts.edu

perseus.tufts.edu

"testamentum: Latin Word Study Tool". www.perseus.tufts.edu. Retrieved 12 August 2020.
"διαθήκη: Greek Word Study Tool". www.perseus.tufts.edu. Retrieved 12 August 2020.

web.archive.org

Pervo, Richard (2015). "Acts in Ephesus (and Environs) c. 115" (PDF). Forum. 3 (Fall 2015): 125–151. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 March 2021.
Trobisch, David. "Who Published the New Testament?" (PDF). Free Inquiry. 28 (Dec. 2007/Jan. 2008): 30–33. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 April 2021. ...Acts provides information that makes it possible to identify Luke, the author of the Gospel, as the doctor who travels with Paul and to identify Mark as someone close to Peter and Paul. This 'canon consciousness' suggests that the book of Acts was composed at a later date than is typically thought; this theory is supported by the first attestation of the book around 180 CE.
ESV Study Bible. Wheaton, IL: Crossway. 2008. p. 2073. ISBN 978-1-4335-0241-5. Archived from the original on 21 March 2023.
ESV Study Bible. Wheaton, IL: Crossway. 2008. p. 1935. ISBN 978-1-4335-0241-5. Archived from the original on 21 March 2023.
Carter, Nancy A. (2000). "The Acts of Thecla: A Pauline Tradition Linked to Women". Conflict and Community in the Corinthian Church. Archived from the original on 28 November 2014.
e.g. Green, E. M. B. (8 July 1960). 2 Peter Reconsidered (PDF) (Speech). Meeting of the Tyndale Fellowship for Biblical Research. Cambridge. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 August 2020.
Spong, John Shelby (26 September 1979). "The Continuing Christian Need for Judaism". Christian Century. p. 918. Archived from the original on 4 June 2011.
Chismar, Janet (20 June 2001). "Homosexual Ordination Vote Widens Gap Between Presbyterian Factions". Religion Today. Archived from the original on 24 May 2021 – via www.christianheadlines.com.
"Essential Statement of Faith". The Harvest: A Messianic Charismatic Congregation. Archived from the original on 27 November 2015. Retrieved 7 June 2012. We believe that the Torah (five books of Moses) is a comprehensive summary of God's foundational laws and ways, as found in both the Tanakh and Apostolic Scriptures. Additionally, the Bible teaches that without holiness no man can see God. We believe in the Doctrine of Sanctification as a definite, yet progressive work of grace, commencing at the time of regeneration and continuing until the consummation of salvation. Therefore we encourage all believers, both Jews and Gentiles, to affirm, embrace, and practice these foundational laws and ways as clarified through the teachings of Messiah Yeshua.
See, for example, Raddatz, Tom (26 October 2000). "A Response to the Oneness-Trinity Debate". 1Lord1Faith.org. Archived from the original on 20 March 2005.
McLarty, John (15 November 2001). "The Adventist Theological Society". Adventist Today. Archived from the original on 25 December 2007.
"Articles of Faith". The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. Archived from the original on 31 May 2013. Retrieved 17 February 2016.

westarinstitute.org

Pervo, Richard (2015). "Acts in Ephesus (and Environs) c. 115" (PDF). Forum. 3 (Fall 2015): 125–151. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 March 2021.

worldcat.org

Fornberg, Tord (1977). An Early Church in a Pluralistic Society: A Study of 2 Peter (Thesis). Coniectanea Biblica, New Testament Series 9. Translated by Gray, Jean. Lund: Gleerup. p. 14. ISBN 9789140044372. OCLC 1244729487.
Bruce 1952, p. 2. Bruce, F. F. (1952) [1951]. The Acts of the Apostles: The Greek Text with Introduction and Commentary (2nd ed.). London: Tyndale Press. OCLC 1244214359.
Brown 1997, pp. 456–466. Brown, Raymond E. (1997). An Introduction to the New Testament. Anchor Bible. New York: Doubleday. ISBN 9780385247672. OCLC 1035750767.
Metzger & Ehrman 2005. Metzger, Bruce M.; Ehrman, Bart D. (2005) [1964]. The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. OCLC 1245822346.
Gamble, Harry Y. (1985). The New Testament Canon: Its Making and Meaning. Philadelphia: Fortress. ISBN 9780800604707. OCLC 1194914119.
For the initial dating of P52, see Roberts 1935 and Bell & Skeat 1935. Though see now Nongbri 2005 and Martinez 2009. Roberts, C. H., ed. (1935). An Unpublished Fragment of the Fourth Gospel in the John Rylands Library. Manchester: Manchester University Press. OCLC 1245905274. Bell, H. Idris; Skeat, T. C. (1935). Fragments of an Unknown Gospel and Other Early Christian Papyri. London: Trustees of the British Museum. Nongbri, Brent (2005). "The Use and Abuse of P52: Papyrological Pitfalls in the Dating of the Fourth Gospel". Harvard Theological Review. 98: 23–52. doi:10.1017/S0017816005000842. S2CID 163128006. Martinez, David G. (2009). "The Papyri and Early Christianity". In Bagnall, Roger S. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Papyrology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 590–623.