Nolle prosequi (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Nolle prosequi" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

5scholar.google.com

1,697^th place

1,040^th place

3books.google.com

3^rd place

3cps.gov.uk

8,764^th place

5,075^th place

1reference.com

657^th place

613^th place

1tufts.edu

155^th place

138^th place

1worldlii.org

low place

1austlii.edu.au

1,812^th place

995^th place

1merriam-webster.com

209^th place

191^st place

1cornell.edu

332^nd place

246^th place

1corporatecrimereporter.com

low place

1web.archive.org

1^st place

1mondaq.com

low place

1irishtimes.com

266^th place

182^nd place

1irishexaminer.com

1,164^th place

659^th place

1academia.edu

121^st place

142^nd place

1nydailynews.com

134^th place

100^th place

1whdh.com

low place

1cpj.org

6,788^th place

4,911^th place

1saflii.org

low place

academia.edu

B. O. Jemilohun. The Attorney-General and the Nolle Prosequi: Powers without Limitations? Retrieved 15 May 2020.

austlii.edu.au

A nolle prosequi can be entered at any time after the indictment or information has been signed and before verdict:R v Dunn [1843] EngR 60; R v Colling (1847) 2 Cox CC 184; R v Sneesby (1951) St R Qd 26; R v Economou [1989] SASC 1670; R v Heald [1979] TASRp 16, [1979] Tas R 185 source: R v Michael Charles Baenisch [1996] SASC 5679 at para. 12 (28 June 1996).

books.google.com

A nolle prosequi can be entered at any time after the indictment or information has been signed and before verdict:R v Dunn [1843] EngR 60; R v Colling (1847) 2 Cox CC 184; R v Sneesby (1951) St R Qd 26; R v Economou [1989] SASC 1670; R v Heald [1979] TASRp 16, [1979] Tas R 185 source: R v Michael Charles Baenisch [1996] SASC 5679 at para. 12 (28 June 1996).
Barnett, Hilaire (2002). Constitutional and Administrative Law (4th ed.). London: Taylor & Francis Group. p. 160. ISBN 9781843144755. On proceedings of indictment, the Attorney General, in the name of the Crown, can enter a nolle prosequi, the effect of which stops the legal proceedings. The power is not subject to the control of the courts: R v Comptroller of Patents (1899).
Mckenna, Marian C. (2002). Franklin Roosevelt and the great constitutional war. Fordham University Press. pp. 8–9. ISBN 0-8232-2154-7.

cornell.edu

law.cornell.edu

FRCRP 48 notes, cornell.edu. Retrieved 2011-11-8.

corporatecrimereporter.com

Greenblum, What Happens to a Prosecution Deferred-Judicial Oversight of Corporate Deferred Prosecution Agreements Archived 19 January 2012 at the Wayback Machine, 105 Colum. L. Rev. 1863 at 1868, 2005.

cpj.org

"South African journalist Karyn Maughan criminally charged over report on former President Zuma". 20 September 2022.

cps.gov.uk

irishexaminer.com

O'Keeffe, Cormac; Cahill, Ann (26 July 2014). "25% of sex cases dropped without reason". Irish Examiner. Retrieved 30 July 2022.

irishtimes.com

Coulter, Carol (25 April 2006). "Nolle prosequi: What it means". Irish Times. Retrieved 30 July 2022.

merriam-webster.com

"Legal Definition of RETRAXIT".

mondaq.com

"The CPS Duty to Pull the plug: Gujra Analysed - Criminal Law - UK".

nydailynews.com

Shifrel, Scott (17 June 2011). "Federal judge drops embassy blast charges against Osama bin Laden". New York Daily News. Retrieved 19 June 2011.

reference.com

dictionary.reference.com

"Nolle prosequi". reference.com. Accessed 2012-03-02.

saflii.org

" "President of the Republic of South Africa vs Zuma and Others (062027/2022) [2023] ZAGPJHC 11".

scholar.google.com

United States v. Cox, 342 F.2d 167 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert denied, 381 U.S. 935 (1965). Involved a federal grand jury indictment against civil rights workers and the refusal by a US attorney to sign the indictment. The Fifth Circuit held that the US attorney's signing or withholding of his signature was within prosecutorial discretion and could not be coerced by the courts. See also the dicta in US v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 at 693, 1974, "[The] Executive Branch has exclusive authority and absolute discretion to decide whether to prosecute a case." (citing Cox).
People v. Grove, 566 N.W.2d 547 at 556, Mich. Sup. Ct. 1997, and cited by Casenote: Criminal Law – Plea Bargaining, 75 U. Det. Mercy L. Rev. 741, Summer, 1998.
Klopfer v. North Carolina, 386 US 213 at 214, 87 S. Ct. 988, 18 L. Ed. 2d 1, Sup. Ct., 1967.
Swick v. Liautaud, 662 NE 2d 1238, 169 Ill. 2d 504, Ill Sup. Ct., 1996.
Wynne v. Rosen, 464 NE 2d 1348, Mass Sup. J. Ct., 1984.

tufts.edu

perseus.tufts.edu

"Nolle prosequi". Lewis & Short. Accessed 2017-02-17.

web.archive.org

Greenblum, What Happens to a Prosecution Deferred-Judicial Oversight of Corporate Deferred Prosecution Agreements Archived 19 January 2012 at the Wayback Machine, 105 Colum. L. Rev. 1863 at 1868, 2005.

whdh.com

Boss, Owen; Mazza, Juliana (9 September 2019). "SJC justice sides with Rollins in dispute over 'Straight Pride Parade' protesters". WHDH. Retrieved 30 July 2022.

worldlii.org

A nolle prosequi can be entered at any time after the indictment or information has been signed and before verdict:R v Dunn [1843] EngR 60; R v Colling (1847) 2 Cox CC 184; R v Sneesby (1951) St R Qd 26; R v Economou [1989] SASC 1670; R v Heald [1979] TASRp 16, [1979] Tas R 185 source: R v Michael Charles Baenisch [1996] SASC 5679 at para. 12 (28 June 1996).