Numenius of Apamea (English Wikipedia)
Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Numenius of Apamea" in English language version.
refsWebsite
Global rank
English rank
179th place
183rd place
27th place
51st place
5th place
5th place
121st place
142nd place
1st place
1st place
academia.edu
- George Boys-Stones (2014). "The fragments of Numenius of Apamea".
doi.org
- Ciholas, Paul (1978). "Plato: The Attic Moses? Some Patristic Reactions to Platonic Philosophy". The Classical World. 72 (4): 217–225 [225]. doi:10.2307/4349036. JSTOR 4349036.
jstor.org
- Ciholas, Paul (1978). "Plato: The Attic Moses? Some Patristic Reactions to Platonic Philosophy". The Classical World. 72 (4): 217–225 [225]. doi:10.2307/4349036. JSTOR 4349036.
- Fuss, Abraham M. (1994). "The Study of Science and Philosophy Justified by Jewish Tradition". The Torah U-Madda Journal. 5: 101–114. ISSN 1050-4745. JSTOR 40914819.
stanford.edu
plato.stanford.edu
- "Numenius". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2016.
- George Karamanolis (2013). "Numenius". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
unl.edu
- Professor John D Turner considers Plotinus, Porphyry, and Amelius all to be Neoplatonic philosophers who were critical of Gnosticism. Professor Turner Archived 2014-08-16 at the Wayback Machine is quoted "In the late third century, Sethianism also became estranged from orthodox (Neo)Platonism under the impetus of attacks and refutations from the circle of Plotinus and other Neoplatonists which were just as effective as those of the Christian heresiologists. At this time, whatever Sethianism was left became increasingly fragmented into various derivative and other sectarian gnostic groups such as the Archontics, Audians, Borborites, Phibionites and others, some of which survived into the Middle Ages."
web.archive.org
- Professor John D Turner considers Plotinus, Porphyry, and Amelius all to be Neoplatonic philosophers who were critical of Gnosticism. Professor Turner Archived 2014-08-16 at the Wayback Machine is quoted "In the late third century, Sethianism also became estranged from orthodox (Neo)Platonism under the impetus of attacks and refutations from the circle of Plotinus and other Neoplatonists which were just as effective as those of the Christian heresiologists. At this time, whatever Sethianism was left became increasingly fragmented into various derivative and other sectarian gnostic groups such as the Archontics, Audians, Borborites, Phibionites and others, some of which survived into the Middle Ages."
wikisource.org
en.wikisource.org
- One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Numenius". Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 19 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 866.
worldcat.org
search.worldcat.org
- Fuss, Abraham M. (1994). "The Study of Science and Philosophy Justified by Jewish Tradition". The Torah U-Madda Journal. 5: 101–114. ISSN 1050-4745. JSTOR 40914819.