Orchestrated objective reduction (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Orchestrated objective reduction" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
2nd place
2nd place
4th place
4th place
18th place
17th place
11th place
8th place
5th place
5th place
6th place
6th place
1st place
1st place
3rd place
3rd place
69th place
59th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
7th place
7th place
207th place
136th place
low place
low place
613th place
456th place
low place
low place
3,833rd place
2,331st place
741st place
577th place
4,464th place
4,468th place
low place
low place
3,538th place
3,083rd place
120th place
125th place
low place
low place
low place
8,786th place
774th place
716th place
low place
low place
3,558th place
2,403rd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,959th place
1,611th place
1,283rd place
1,130th place

archive.org

arxiv.org

bigbangpage.com

books.google.com

cern.ch

cds.cern.ch

cogprints.org

consc.net

doi.org

eurekalert.org

futurism.com

harvard.edu

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

iospress.com

content.iospress.com

journalofcosmology.com

kcl.ac.uk

mth.kcl.ac.uk

  • In an article at "King's College London - Department of Mathematics". Archived from the original on 25 January 2001. Retrieved 22 October 2010. L.J. Landau at the Mathematics Department of King's College London writes that "Penrose's argument, its basis and implications, is rejected by experts in the fields which it touches."

mappingignorance.org

  • Villatoro, Francisco R. (17 June 2015). "On the quantum theory of consciousness". Mapping Ignorance. University of the Basque Country. Retrieved 18 August 2018. Hameroff's ideas in the hands of Penrose have developed almost to absurdity.

newscientist.com

nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

nytimes.com

archive.nytimes.com

ox.ac.uk

users.ox.ac.uk

patriciachurchland.com

phys.org

princeton.edu

  • Princeton Philosophy professor John Burgess writes in On the Outside Looking In: A Caution about Conservativeness (published in Kurt Gödel: Essays for his Centennial, with the following comments found on pp. 131–132) that "the consensus view of logicians today seems to be that the Lucas–Penrose argument is fallacious, though as I have said elsewhere, there is at least this much to be said for Lucas and Penrose, that logicians are not unanimously agreed as to where precisely the fallacy in their argument lies. There are at least three points at which the argument may be attacked."

psu.edu

citeseerx.ist.psu.edu

quantumconsciousness.org

researchgate.net

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

simonsfoundation.org

tau.ac.il

cs.tau.ac.il

uq.edu.au

espace.library.uq.edu.au

web.archive.org

worldcat.org