Oslo Accords (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Oslo Accords" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
3rd place
3rd place
26th place
20th place
2nd place
2nd place
268th place
215th place
7th place
7th place
97th place
164th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
12th place
11th place
low place
low place
14th place
14th place
low place
low place
2,707th place
2,707th place
5th place
5th place
505th place
410th place
555th place
467th place
290th place
202nd place
571st place
403rd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
960th place
854th place
low place
low place
544th place
387th place
2,088th place
1,251st place
231st place
332nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
514th place
4,733rd place
2,119th place
low place
1,716th place
973rd place
8th place
10th place
7,705th place
6,028th place
2,858th place
2,017th place
1,840th place
1,115th place
3,812th place
3,173rd place
low place
low place
507th place
429th place
11th place
8th place
low place
low place
791st place
550th place

aljazeera.com

arabcenterdc.org

archive.today

axios.com

bbc.co.uk

news.bbc.co.uk

books.google.com

brill.com

btselem.org

carnegieendowment.org

csmonitor.com

doi.org

fas.org

irp.fas.org

fmep.org

gazagateway.org

haaretz.co.il

history.com

intelligence.org.il

jpost.com

jstor.org

justsecurity.org

justvision.org

maarachot.idf.il

maariv.co.il

medea.be

meforum.org

mfa.gov.il

middleeasteye.net

multied.com

  • Annex IV (paragraph 1) of the Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government Arrangements Archived October 14, 2007, at the Wayback Machine: "The two sides will cooperate in the context of the multilateral peace efforts in promoting a Development Program for the region, including the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, to be initiated by the G7. The parties will request the G7 to seek the participation in this program of other interested states, such as members of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, regional Arab states and institutions, as well as members of the private sector."

nytimes.com

nytimes.com

query.nytimes.com

oecd.org

stats.oecd.org

palestine-studies.org

  • Israeli Settlements in Occupied Arab Lands: Conquest to Colony[permanent dead link], p. 29. Journal of Palestine Studies, Vol. 11, No. 2 (Winter, 1982), pp. 16–54. Published by: University of California Press on behalf of the Institute for Palestine Studies
  • Postscript to Oslo: The Mystery of Norway's Missing Files Archived 24 September 2015 at the Wayback Machine. Hilde Henriksen Waage, Journal of Palestine Studies, Vol. XXXVIII, No. 1 (Autumn 2008), pp. 54–65; ISSN 1533-8614
    "Had the missing documents ... been accessible at the time of writing, there seems no doubt that the findings of my report would have shown even more starkly the extent to which the Oslo process was conducted on Israel's premises, with Norway acting as Israel's helpful errand boy .... Given the overwhelming imbalance of power between the Israelis and the Palestinians, Norway probably could not have acted otherwise if it wanted to reach a deal—or even if it wanted to play a role in the process at all. Israel's red lines were the ones that counted, and if the Palestinians wanted a deal, they would have to accept them, too .... The missing documents would almost certainly show why the Oslo process probably never could have resulted in a sustainable peace. To a great extent, full documentation of the back channel would explain the disaster that followed Oslo."

procon.org

israelipalestinian.procon.org

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

tandfonline.com

theguardian.com

thenation.com

timesofisrael.com

un.org

unispal.un.org

un.org

upi.com

wafa.ps

english.wafa.ps

web.archive.org

worldbank.org

documents.worldbank.org

  • "West Bank and Gaza – Area C and the future of the Palestinian economy". World Bank. 2 October 2013. p. 4. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 August 2014. Retrieved 27 July 2014. Less than 1 percent of Area C, which is already built up, is designated by the Israeli authorities for Palestinian use; the remainder is heavily restricted or off-limits to Palestinians, 13 with 68 percent reserved for Israeli settlements, 14 c. 21 percent for closed military zones, 15 and c. 9 percent for nature reserves (approximately 10 percent of the West Bank, 86 percent of which lies in Area C). These areas are not mutually exclusive, and overlap in some cases. In practice it is virtually impossible for Palestinians to obtain construction permits for residential or economic purposes, even within existing Palestinian villages in Area C: the application process has been described by an earlier World Bank report (2008) as fraught with "ambiguity, complexity and high cost".

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

worldcat.org

  • Postscript to Oslo: The Mystery of Norway's Missing Files Archived 24 September 2015 at the Wayback Machine. Hilde Henriksen Waage, Journal of Palestine Studies, Vol. XXXVIII, No. 1 (Autumn 2008), pp. 54–65; ISSN 1533-8614
    "Had the missing documents ... been accessible at the time of writing, there seems no doubt that the findings of my report would have shown even more starkly the extent to which the Oslo process was conducted on Israel's premises, with Norway acting as Israel's helpful errand boy .... Given the overwhelming imbalance of power between the Israelis and the Palestinians, Norway probably could not have acted otherwise if it wanted to reach a deal—or even if it wanted to play a role in the process at all. Israel's red lines were the ones that counted, and if the Palestinians wanted a deal, they would have to accept them, too .... The missing documents would almost certainly show why the Oslo process probably never could have resulted in a sustainable peace. To a great extent, full documentation of the back channel would explain the disaster that followed Oslo."

wrmea.org