Outer Space Treaty (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Outer Space Treaty" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
low place
low place
2nd place
2nd place
27th place
51st place
9,535th place
6,953rd place
11th place
8th place
264th place
249th place
low place
low place
744th place
547th place
432nd place
278th place
4,668th place
4,266th place
3,727th place
7,316th place
97th place
164th place
low place
low place
low place
8,266th place
193rd place
152nd place
low place
9,862nd place
1,482nd place
1,468th place
75th place
83rd place
12th place
11th place
730th place
468th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,876th place
1,225th place
4,027th place
6,129th place
low place
low place

congress.gov

doi.org

esa.int

fco.gov.uk

treaties.fco.gov.uk

gov.uk

iflscience.com

  • Who Owns Space? US Asteroid-Mining Act Is Dangerous And Potentially Illegal. IFL. Accessed on 9 November 2019. Quote 1: "The act represents a full-frontal attack on settled principles of space law which are based on two basic principles: the right of states to scientific exploration of outer space and its celestial bodies and the prevention of unilateral and unbriddled commercial exploitation of outer-space resources. These principles are found in agreements including the Outer Space Treaty of 1967 and the Moon Agreement of 1979." *Quote 2: "Understanding the legality of asteroid mining starts with the 1967 Outer Space Treaty. Some might argue the treaty bans all space property rights, citing Article II."

jaxa.jp

jps.net

pweb.jps.net

mid.ru

nasa.gov

nationalarchives.gov.uk

webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk

opiniojuris.org

orfonline.org

  • If space is ‘the province of mankind’, who owns its resources? Senjuti Mallick and Rajeswari Pillai Rajagopalan. The Observer Research Foundation. 24 January 2019. Quote 1: "The Outer Space Treaty (OST) of 1967, considered the global foundation of the outer space legal regime, […] has been insufficient and ambiguous in providing clear regulations to newer space activities such as asteroid mining." *Quote2: "Although the OST does not explicitly mention "mining" activities, under Article II, outer space including the Moon and other celestial bodies are "not subject to national appropriation by claim of sovereignty" through use, occupation or any other means."

peacepalacelibrary.nl

regblog.org

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

  • Buono, Stephen (2 April 2020). "Merely a 'Scrap of Paper'? The Outer Space Treaty in Historical Perspective". Diplomacy and Statecraft. 31 (2): 350-372. doi:10.1080/09592296.2020.1760038. S2CID 221060714.
  • Koch, Jonathan Sydney (2008). "Institutional Framework for the Province of all Mankind: Lessons from the International Seabed Authority for the Governance of Commercial Space Mining". Astropolitics. 16 (1): 1–27. doi:10.1080/14777622.2017.1381824. S2CID 149116769.

spacenews.com

state.gov

state.gov

2009-2017.state.gov

theguardian.com

thespacereview.com

un.org

disarmament.un.org

unoda.org

treaties.unoda.org

  • "Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies". United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 16 September 2017.

unoosa.org

web.archive.org

wikisource.org

en.wikisource.org

wired.com