Phimosis (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Phimosis" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
4th place
4th place
2nd place
2nd place
1st place
1st place
11th place
8th place
3rd place
3rd place
low place
low place
low place
8,161st place
5th place
5th place
6,248th place
9,253rd place
209th place
191st place
low place
low place
low place
low place
155th place
138th place
287th place
321st place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
3,595th place
3,333rd place
14th place
14th place
222nd place
297th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place

archive.today

books.google.com

cfp.ca

circfacts.org

cirp.org

cps.ca

caringforkids.cps.ca

doctorsopposingcircumcision.org

  • "Phimosis". Doctors Opposing Circumcision. 6 July 2016.

doi.org

drmomma.org

emedicine.com

etymonline.com

fimose.org

healthychildren.org

historyofcircumcision.net

merriam-webster.com

mja.com.au

nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

novoglan.com

store.novoglan.com

phimosis.ca

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

pdfs.semanticscholar.org

tufts.edu

perseus.tufts.edu

web.archive.org

  • Entry "phimosis" in Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary Archived 2017-09-22 at the Wayback Machine.
  • "Phimosis". PubMed Health. Archived from the original on 5 November 2017. Retrieved 28 October 2016.
  • "What are the treatment options for phimosis?". PubMed Health. Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care. 7 October 2015. Archived from the original on 5 November 2017. Retrieved 28 October 2016.
  • Kirk RH, Winslet MC (2007). Essential General Surgical Operations. Elsevier Health Sciences. p. 365. ISBN 978-0-443-10314-8. Archived from the original on 5 November 2017.
  • "Care of the Uncircumcised Penis". Guide for parents. American Academy of Pediatrics. September 2007. Archived from the original on 30 August 2012.
  • "Caring for an uncircumcised penis". Information for parents. Canadian Paediatric Society. July 2012. Archived from the original on 16 July 2012.
  • Denniston GC, Hill G (October 2010). "Gairdner was wrong". Canadian Family Physician. 56 (10): 986–7. PMC 2954072. PMID 20944034. Archived from the original on 23 September 2015. Retrieved 5 April 2014.
  • Hill G (June 2003). "Circumcision for phimosis and other medical indications in Western Australian boys". The Medical Journal of Australia. 178 (11): 587, author reply 589–90. doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05368.x. PMID 12765511. S2CID 11588415. Archived from the original on 30 August 2008.
  • Thorvaldsen MA, Meyhoff HH (April 2005). "[Pathological or physiological phimosis?]" (PDF). Ugeskrift for Laeger. 167 (17): 1858–62. PMID 15929334. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 February 2016. Retrieved 3 December 2012.
  • Spilsbury K, Semmens JB, Wisniewski ZS, Holman CD (February 2003). "Circumcision for phimosis and other medical indications in Western Australian boys". The Medical Journal of Australia. 178 (4): 155–8. doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2003.tb05130.x. PMID 12580740. S2CID 9842095. Archived from the original on 9 November 2004.. Recent Australian statistics with good discussion of ascertainment problems arising from surgical statistics.
  • Kikiros CS, Beasley SW, Woodward AA (1 May 1993). "The response of phimosis to local steroid application" (PDF). Pediatric Surgery International. 8 (4): 329–332. doi:10.1007/BF00173357. ISSN 0179-0358. S2CID 28662055. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 March 2016.
  • Shankar KR, Rickwood AM (July 1999). "The incidence of phimosis in boys" (PDF). BJU International. 84 (1): 101–2. doi:10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00147.x. PMID 10444134. S2CID 20191682. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 February 2020. This study gives a low incidence of pathological phimosis (0.6% of uncircumcised boys by age 15 years) by asserting that balanitis xerotica obliterans is the only indisputable type of pathological phimosis and anything else should be assumed "physiological". Restrictiveness of definition and circularity of reasoning have been criticized.

wiley.com

www3.interscience.wiley.com

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org