Pioglitazone (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Pioglitazone" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
4th place
4th place
2nd place
2nd place
1st place
1st place
11th place
8th place
447th place
338th place
68th place
117th place
3rd place
3rd place
3,912th place
2,496th place
399th place
333rd place
7,875th place
8,199th place
102nd place
76th place
113th place
775th place
low place
low place
49th place
47th place
18th place
17th place
low place
low place
1,523rd place
976th place

books.google.com

clincalc.com

doi.org

drugpatentwatch.com

drugs.com

escholarship.org

europa.eu

ema.europa.eu

fda.gov

handle.net

hdl.handle.net

  • Scheen AJ (November 2012). "Outcomes and lessons from the PROactive study". Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 98 (2): 175–86. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2012.09.001. hdl:2268/132794. PMID 23020930. Archived from the original on 28 January 2021. Retrieved 18 September 2019. Since 2005, there has been much debate on the relative value of the statistically non-significant 10% reduction in the quite challenging primary composite endpoint (combining cardiovascular disease-driven and procedural events in all vascular beds) versus the statistically significant 16% decrease in the more robust and conventional main secondary endpoint (all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke) observed with pioglitazone.

harvard.edu

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

lefigaro.fr

medical-reference.net

nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

dailymed.nlm.nih.gov

  • "Actos- pioglitazone tablet". DailyMed. 25 January 2019. Archived from the original on 6 September 2015. Retrieved 13 February 2020.

reuters.com

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

ulg.ac.be

orbi.ulg.ac.be

  • Scheen AJ (November 2012). "Outcomes and lessons from the PROactive study". Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 98 (2): 175–86. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2012.09.001. hdl:2268/132794. PMID 23020930. Archived from the original on 28 January 2021. Retrieved 18 September 2019. Since 2005, there has been much debate on the relative value of the statistically non-significant 10% reduction in the quite challenging primary composite endpoint (combining cardiovascular disease-driven and procedural events in all vascular beds) versus the statistically significant 16% decrease in the more robust and conventional main secondary endpoint (all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke) observed with pioglitazone.

web.archive.org