Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1,812th place
995th place
6,658th place
4,027th place
low place
low place
2,365th place
1,348th place

aph.gov.au

parlinfo.aph.gov.au

austlii.edu.au

  • The effect of the Migration Legislation Amendment Act (No. 6) 2001 (Cth) is that courts cannot name plaintiffs seeking protection visas in order to reduce the potential that the publication the applicants name may create further protection claims for people in Australia or put their families and colleagues overseas at risk of harm: "Explanatory Memorandum".
  • Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth [2003] HCA 2, (2003) 211 CLR 476 "judgment summary" (PDF). High Court. 4 February 2003.
  • Note: LawCite citation statistics track the written judgements of courts, journal articles, and tribunals. (both in Australia and overseas) https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/LawCite?cit=&party1=&party2=&court=High%2BCourt%2Bof%2BAustralia&juris=&article=&author=&year1=&year2=&synonyms=on&filter=on&cases-cited=&legis-cited=&section=&large-search-ok=1&sort-order=cited
  • Constitution (Cth) s 75 Original jurisdiction of High Court.
  • R v Hickman; ex parte Fox & Clinton [1945] HCA 53, (1945) 70 CLR 598 (4 February 2003), High Court (Australia).

hcourt.gov.au

legislation.gov.au

  • The effect of the Migration Legislation Amendment Act (No. 6) 2001 (Cth) is that courts cannot name plaintiffs seeking protection visas in order to reduce the potential that the publication the applicants name may create further protection claims for people in Australia or put their families and colleagues overseas at risk of harm: "Explanatory Memorandum".
  • Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 474 Decisions under Act are final.
  • Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 486A Time limit on applications to the High Court for judicial review.