Plantin (typeface) (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Plantin (typeface)" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
3rd place
3rd place
low place
low place
6th place
6th place
14th place
14th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,013th place
739th place
low place
low place
3,407th place
2,115th place
1st place
1st place
low place
low place
2nd place
2nd place
low place
8,010th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
254th place
236th place
5th place
5th place

archive.org

archive.today

books.google.com

brigitteschuster.com

doi.org

  • Lane, John A. (1995). "Arent Corsz Hogenacker (ca. 1579-1636): an account of his typefoundry and a note on his types Part two: the types". Quaerendo. 25 (3): 163. doi:10.1163/157006995X00017. Most of these sixteenth-century types were originally cut without the letters J, U, and W, which were added in the seventeenth century.

economist.com

eyemagazine.com

flickr.com

fontfeed.com

fontreviewjournal.com

fontsinuse.com

gaspereaupress.blogspot.co.uk

gold.ac.uk

research.gold.ac.uk

iaddb.org

magazines.iaddb.org

klim.co.nz

monokrom.no

myfonts.com

nypl.org

typefoundry.blogspot.co.uk

typophile.com

  • Mosley, James. "Comments on Typophile thread". Typophile (archived). Archived from the original on 2011-10-13. Retrieved 16 December 2016. The consensus appears to be that not only the wrong-fount a in the cases at Antwerp but also the italic that Monotype adapted for their Plantin (which can be seen on that first page of the 1905 specimen) may be the work of Johann Michael Schmidt (died 1750), also known as J. M. Smit or Smid.

ultrasparky.org

visiblelanguagejournal.com

vllg.com

web.archive.org

  • Mosley, James. "Comments on Typophile thread". Typophile (archived). Archived from the original on 2011-10-13. Retrieved 16 December 2016. The consensus appears to be that not only the wrong-fount a in the cases at Antwerp but also the italic that Monotype adapted for their Plantin (which can be seen on that first page of the 1905 specimen) may be the work of Johann Michael Schmidt (died 1750), also known as J. M. Smit or Smid.

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org