Point 5353 (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Point 5353" in English language version.

Last modified:

Ref.Un. Ref.Website
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
668th place
350th place
3rd place
3rd place
1,392nd place
691st place
640th place
331st place
72nd place
37th place
253rd place
124th place
121st place
59th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
31st place
19th place
11th place
10th place
790th place
438th place
1,350th place
644th place
3,254th place
1,677th place
40th place
27th place
108th place
58th place
8,285th place
4,871st place
low place
low place

bbc.co.uk (Global: 11th place; English: 10th place)

news.bbc.co.uk

books.google.com (Global: 3rd place; English: 3rd place)

claws.in (Global: low place; English: low place)

frontline.in (Global: 8,285th place; English: 4,871st place)

  • Praveen Swami, Fact and fiction on Point 5353, Frontline, 30 September 2000. 'No one appeared to be in any doubt about just where Point 5353 was during the Kargil war itself.... "The maps signed by the Indian and Pakistani DGMOs (Directors General of Military Operations) in 1972 clearly indicate that it belongs to India," the PTI despatch noted.'

india.com (Global: 790th place; English: 438th place)

zeenews.india.com

indiandefencereview.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

indianexpress.com (Global: 108th place; English: 58th place)

archive.indianexpress.com

indiatimes.com (Global: 31st place; English: 19th place)

timesofindia.indiatimes.com

economictimes.indiatimes.com

jammu-kashmir.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

proquest.com (Global: 121st place; English: 59th place)

  • Kashmir peak "recaptured" by Indian army; 16 reportedly killed, BBC Monitoring South Asia, 27 August 2002. ProQuest 452165601. "It might be recalled that the then army chief, General V. P. Malik, had asked Brigadier Amar Nath Aul, the commander of 56 Brigade at Dras, at the height of the Kargil conflict to seize Point 5240 and Point 5353 from the Pakistanis, who had taken control of these peaks."
  • PTI, Pakistan army launches major build-up along Line of Control – Indian report, BBC Monitoring South Asia, 10 August 1999. ProQuest 452135188. "Meanwhile, fighting is still going on for recapturing the point 5353 in Mushkoh valley, situated on the Line of Control (LOC), which Islamabad claims to be part of Pakistan."

rediff.com (Global: 253rd place; English: 124th place)

telegraph.co.uk (Global: 40th place; English: 27th place)

telegraphindia.com (Global: 640th place; English: 331st place)

thehindu.com (Global: 72nd place; English: 37th place)

thehindu.com

frontline.thehindu.com

thehindubusinessline.com (Global: 1,392nd place; English: 691st place)

  • Swami, Praveen (11 August 2000). "Pakistan still occupies key Drass point". The Hindu Business Line. Retrieved 29 September 2017.
  • Praveen Swami, Pakistan still occupies key Drass point, The Hindu Business Line, 11 August 2000. "When Pakistani troops detected the Indian presence on 5240, they promptly launched a counter assault on 5353. Seven days later, in early November, the Grenadiers unit on 5240 watched Pakistan take up positions on the more important peak."
  • Praveen Swami, Controversy on point 5353, The Hindu Business Line, 13 August 2000: "First, the Army's own one-inch maps... make clear that point 5353 is on the Indian side of the LoC. Copies of these maps, in Business Line's possession, show that the Marpo La ridge, on which point 5353 is located, does slope down into the Pakistan side of the LoC. But the summit and southern face of point 5353, where Pakistan has built fortified bunkers, are unmistakably on the Indian side of the LoC."
  • Swami, Praveen (13 August 2000), "Controversy on point 5353", The Hindu Business Line, retrieved 20 January 2018
  • Swami, Praveen (24 August 2002). "Border skirmishes in Drass since May". The Hindu Business Line. Archived from the original on 30 August 2005. Retrieved 24 September 2017.
  • Swami, Praveen (23 August 2002). "LoC turns hot again". The Hindu Business Line. Archived from the original on 25 January 2005. Retrieved 24 September 2017.

theprint.in (Global: 1,350th place; English: 644th place)

thestatesman.com (Global: 3,254th place; English: 1,677th place)

tribuneindia.com (Global: 668th place; English: 350th place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; English: 1st place)