Point State Park (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Point State Park" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
2,762nd place
1,498th place
569th place
354th place
135th place
105th place
4th place
4th place
420th place
235th place
low place
low place
4,802nd place
2,830th place
6th place
6th place
2nd place
2nd place
3rd place
3rd place
9,029th place
6,022nd place
194th place
643rd place

archive.org

books.google.com

  • Medical Aspects of Biological Warfare. Government Printing Office. 2007. p. 3. ISBN 978-0-16-087238-9. In retrospect, it is difficult to evaluate the tactical success of Captain Ecuyer's biological attack because smallpox may have been transmitted after other contacts with colonists, as had previously happened in New England and the South. Although scabs from smallpox patients are thought to be of low infectivity as a result of binding of the virus in fibrin metric, and transmission by fomites has been considered inefficient compared with respiratory droplet transmission.

doi.org

  • Barras V, Greub G (June 2014). "History of biological warfare and bioterrorism". Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 20 (6): 497–502. doi:10.1111/1469-0691.12706. PMID 24894605. However, in the light of contemporary knowledge, it remains doubtful whether his hopes were fulfilled, given the fact that the transmission of smallpox through this kind of vector is much less efficient than respiratory transmission, and that Native Americans had been in contact with smallpox >200 years before Ecuyer's trickery, notably during Pizarro's conquest of South America in the 16th century. As a whole, the analysis of the various 'pre-micro- biological" attempts at BW illustrate the difficulty of differentiating attempted biological attack from naturally occurring epidemics.

nationalmap.gov

edits.nationalmap.gov

  • "Point State Park". Geographic Names Information System. United States Geological Survey. August 2, 1979. Retrieved May 26, 2008.

nau.edu

www2.nau.edu

nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

  • Ranlet, P (2000). "The British, the Indians, and smallpox: what actually happened at Fort Pitt in 1763?". Pennsylvania History. 67 (3): 427–441. PMID 17216901.
  • Barras V, Greub G (June 2014). "History of biological warfare and bioterrorism". Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 20 (6): 497–502. doi:10.1111/1469-0691.12706. PMID 24894605. However, in the light of contemporary knowledge, it remains doubtful whether his hopes were fulfilled, given the fact that the transmission of smallpox through this kind of vector is much less efficient than respiratory transmission, and that Native Americans had been in contact with smallpox >200 years before Ecuyer's trickery, notably during Pizarro's conquest of South America in the 16th century. As a whole, the analysis of the various 'pre-micro- biological" attempts at BW illustrate the difficulty of differentiating attempted biological attack from naturally occurring epidemics.

nps.gov

npgallery.nps.gov

tps.cr.nps.gov

  • "Forks of the Ohio". National Historic Landmark summary listing. National Park Service. Archived from the original on July 22, 2011. Retrieved July 2, 2008.

pittsburghlive.com

post-gazette.com

postgazette.com

state.pa.us

dcnr.state.pa.us

web.archive.org

wikiwix.com

archive.wikiwix.com