Politics of the United Kingdom (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Politics of the United Kingdom" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
8th place
10th place
12th place
11th place
1st place
1st place
367th place
243rd place
30th place
24th place
32nd place
21st place
2nd place
2nd place
20th place
30th place
8,254th place
4,826th place
11th place
8th place
low place
low place
36th place
33rd place
241st place
193rd place
245th place
189th place
low place
6,013th place
40th place
58th place
low place
low place
1,055th place
848th place
low place
7,188th place
7,387th place
4,467th place
low place
low place
102nd place
76th place
485th place
440th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
744th place
547th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
5th place
5th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
5,824th place
238th place
159th place
low place
low place
34th place
27th place
1,347th place
909th place
4,295th place
2,413th place
3,305th place
3,353rd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
3rd place
3rd place
431st place
274th place
28th place
26th place
68th place
117th place

bbc.co.uk

bbc.co.uk

news.bbc.co.uk

bbc.com

books.google.com

britannica.com

  • "two-party system | Features, Advantages, & Problems". Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved 19 November 2020.

centreonconstitutionalchange.ac.uk

cheshireeast.gov.uk

cnn.com

edition.cnn.com

dca.gov.uk

doi.org

  • Keating, Michael (2 February 2021). "Taking back control? Brexit and the territorial constitution of the United Kingdom". Journal of European Public Policy. 28 (4). Abingdon: Taylor & Francis: 6–7. doi:10.1080/13501763.2021.1876156. hdl:1814/70296. S2CID 234066376. The UK Internal Market Act gives ministers sweeping powers to enforce mutual recognition and non-discrimination across the four jurisdictions. Existing differences and some social and health matters are exempted but these are much less extensive than the exemptions permitted under the EU Internal Market provisions. Only after an amendment in the House of Lords, the Bill was amended to provide a weak and non-binding consent mechanism for amendments (equivalent to the Sewel Convention) to the list of exemptions. The result is that, while the devolved governments retain regulatory competences, these are undermined by the fact that goods and services originating in, or imported into, England can be marketed anywhere.
  • Kenny, Michael; McEwen, Nicola (1 March 2021). "Intergovernmental Relations and the Crisis of the Union". Political Insight. 12 (1). SAGE Publishing: 12–15. doi:10.1177/20419058211000996. S2CID 232050477. That phase of joint working was significantly damaged by the UK Internal Market Act, pushed through by the Johnson government in December 2020...the Act diminishes the authority of the devolved institutions, and was vehemently opposed by them.
  • Wolffe, W James (7 April 2021). "Devolution and the Statute Book". Statute Law Review. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/slr/hmab003. Retrieved 18 April 2021. the Internal Market Bill—a Bill that contains provisions which, if enacted, would significantly constrain, both legally and as a matter of practicality, the exercise by the devolved legislatures of their legislative competence; provisions that would be significantly more restrictive of the powers of the Scottish Parliament than either EU law or Articles 4 and 6 of the Acts of the Union...The UK Parliament passed the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Act 2020 and the Internal Market Act 2020 notwithstanding that, in each case, all three of the devolved legislatures had withheld consent.
  • Wincott, Daniel; Murray, C. R. G.; Davies, Gregory (17 May 2021). "The Anglo-British imaginary and the rebuilding of the UK's territorial constitution after Brexit: unitary state or union state?". Territory, Politics, Governance. 10 (5). Abingdon/Brighton: Taylor & Francis; Regional Studies Association: 696–713. doi:10.1080/21622671.2021.1921613. Taken as a whole, the Internal Market Act imposes greater restrictions upon the competences of the devolved institutions than the provisions of the EU Single Market which it replaced, in spite of pledges to use common frameworks to address these issues. Lord Hope, responsible for many of the leading judgments relating to the first two decades of devolution, regarded the legislation's terms as deliberately confrontational: 'this Parliament can do what it likes, but a different approach is essential if the union is to hold together'.

eiu.com

electoralcommission.org.uk

search.electoralcommission.org.uk

europa.eu

ec.europa.eu

ghostarchive.org

gov.scot

handle.net

hdl.handle.net

  • Keating, Michael (2 February 2021). "Taking back control? Brexit and the territorial constitution of the United Kingdom". Journal of European Public Policy. 28 (4). Abingdon: Taylor & Francis: 6–7. doi:10.1080/13501763.2021.1876156. hdl:1814/70296. S2CID 234066376. The UK Internal Market Act gives ministers sweeping powers to enforce mutual recognition and non-discrimination across the four jurisdictions. Existing differences and some social and health matters are exempted but these are much less extensive than the exemptions permitted under the EU Internal Market provisions. Only after an amendment in the House of Lords, the Bill was amended to provide a weak and non-binding consent mechanism for amendments (equivalent to the Sewel Convention) to the list of exemptions. The result is that, while the devolved governments retain regulatory competences, these are undermined by the fact that goods and services originating in, or imported into, England can be marketed anywhere.

holyrood.com

humanists.uk

independent.co.uk

labour.org.uk

labourlist.org

libdems.org.uk

liverpool.ac.uk

manxman.co.im

mind.org.uk

mirror.co.uk

nationalarchives.gov.uk

webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk

oup.com

academic.oup.com

  • Wolffe, W James (7 April 2021). "Devolution and the Statute Book". Statute Law Review. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/slr/hmab003. Retrieved 18 April 2021. the Internal Market Bill—a Bill that contains provisions which, if enacted, would significantly constrain, both legally and as a matter of practicality, the exercise by the devolved legislatures of their legislative competence; provisions that would be significantly more restrictive of the powers of the Scottish Parliament than either EU law or Articles 4 and 6 of the Acts of the Union...The UK Parliament passed the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Act 2020 and the Internal Market Act 2020 notwithstanding that, in each case, all three of the devolved legislatures had withheld consent.

parliament.scot

parliament.uk

parliament.uk

scottish.parliament.uk

commonslibrary.parliament.uk

researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk

party.coop

politico.eu

politicshome.com

royal.uk

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

  • Keating, Michael (2 February 2021). "Taking back control? Brexit and the territorial constitution of the United Kingdom". Journal of European Public Policy. 28 (4). Abingdon: Taylor & Francis: 6–7. doi:10.1080/13501763.2021.1876156. hdl:1814/70296. S2CID 234066376. The UK Internal Market Act gives ministers sweeping powers to enforce mutual recognition and non-discrimination across the four jurisdictions. Existing differences and some social and health matters are exempted but these are much less extensive than the exemptions permitted under the EU Internal Market provisions. Only after an amendment in the House of Lords, the Bill was amended to provide a weak and non-binding consent mechanism for amendments (equivalent to the Sewel Convention) to the list of exemptions. The result is that, while the devolved governments retain regulatory competences, these are undermined by the fact that goods and services originating in, or imported into, England can be marketed anywhere.
  • Kenny, Michael; McEwen, Nicola (1 March 2021). "Intergovernmental Relations and the Crisis of the Union". Political Insight. 12 (1). SAGE Publishing: 12–15. doi:10.1177/20419058211000996. S2CID 232050477. That phase of joint working was significantly damaged by the UK Internal Market Act, pushed through by the Johnson government in December 2020...the Act diminishes the authority of the devolved institutions, and was vehemently opposed by them.

sky.com

news.sky.com

standard.co.uk

telegraph.co.uk

thecep.org.uk

theguardian.com

thenational.scot

thepatrioticalliance.co.uk

timesonline.co.uk

v-dem.net

washingtonpost.com

web.archive.org

westmonster.com

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

x.com