Portable C Compiler (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Portable C Compiler" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
low place
8,542nd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
2nd place
2nd place
11th place
8th place
415th place
327th place
207th place
136th place
low place
6,254th place
5,739th place
4,857th place
5,701st place
4,384th place
4,683rd place
3,096th place
5,469th place
3,758th place
low place
low place
low place
low place

bell-labs.com

plan9.bell-labs.com

  • Ritchie, Dennis M. (1993). "The development of the C language". The second ACM SIGPLAN conference on History of programming languages. Cambridge, Massachusetts. pp. 201–208. Retrieved 2008-12-30. At the start of the decade, nearly every compiler was based on Johnson's pcc; by 1985 there were many independently-produced compiler products.

bsdfund.org

doi.org

  • Johnson, S.C. (1978). "A portable compiler: theory and practice". Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGACT-SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages. Tucson, Arizona.: 97–104. doi:10.1145/512760.512771. S2CID 14390804.

freebsd.org

lists.freebsd.org

ltu.se

pcc.ludd.ltu.se

  • "pcc history". pcc - portable c compiler. 2010-06-21. Retrieved 2012-06-26.
  • Magnusson, Anders (2011-04-01). "1.0 Release". Portable C Compiler. Retrieved 2011-12-17.
  • Magnusson, Anders (2014-12-10). "1.1.0 Release". Portable C Compiler. Retrieved 2022-04-22.

marc.info

mit.edu

lcs.mit.edu

netbsd.org

mail-index.netbsd.org

phoronix.com

psu.edu

citeseer.ist.psu.edu

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

  • Johnson, S.C. (1978). "A portable compiler: theory and practice". Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGACT-SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages. Tucson, Arizona.: 97–104. doi:10.1145/512760.512771. S2CID 14390804.

slashdot.org

developers.slashdot.org

stroustrup.com

thejemreport.com

  • Matzan, Jem (2007-10-15). "More on OpenBSD's new compiler". The Jem Report. Archived from the original on 2012-01-04. Retrieved 2011-12-17. But that's never really been the agenda, see. Some people think we hate GNU code. But the thing is we hate large code, and buggy code that upstream does not maintain. That's the real problem… gcc gets about 5-6% slower every release, has new bugs, generates crappy code, and drives us nuts. This is just an attempt to see if something better can show up.

undeadly.org

web.archive.org