Pragmatism (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Pragmatism" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
2nd place
2nd place
5th place
5th place
7,869th place
5,124th place
3rd place
3rd place
6th place
6th place
26th place
20th place
11th place
8th place
27th place
51st place
731st place
638th place
179th place
183rd place
low place
low place
3,316th place
1,982nd place
7,153rd place
4,975th place
121st place
142nd place
102nd place
76th place
4th place
4th place
low place
low place
1,670th place
2,355th place
low place
low place
666th place
1,300th place
low place
8,701st place
1,379th place
1,175th place
120th place
125th place
low place
low place
14th place
14th place
5,520th place
3,524th place

academia.edu

archive.org

archive.today

books.google.com

cspeirce.com

  • Peirce held that (philosophical) logic is a normative field, that pragmatism is a method developed in it, and that philosophy, though not deductive or so general as mathematics, still concerns positive phenomena in general, including phenomena of matter and mind, without depending on special experiences or experiments such as those of optics and experimental psychology, in both of which Peirce was active. See quotes under "Philosophy" at the Commens Dictionary of Peirce's Terms. Peirce also harshly criticized the Cartesian approach of starting from hyperbolic doubts rather than from the combination of established beliefs and genuine doubts. See the opening of his 1868 "Some Consequences of Four Incapacities", Journal of Speculative Philosophy v. 2, n. 3, pp. 140–157. Reprinted Collected Papers v. 5, paragraphs 264–317, Writings v. 2, pp. 211–242, and Essential Peirce v. 1, pp. 28–55. Eprint.

doi.org

erraticus.co

handle.net

hdl.handle.net

helsinki.fi

  • Peirce held that (philosophical) logic is a normative field, that pragmatism is a method developed in it, and that philosophy, though not deductive or so general as mathematics, still concerns positive phenomena in general, including phenomena of matter and mind, without depending on special experiences or experiments such as those of optics and experimental psychology, in both of which Peirce was active. See quotes under "Philosophy" at the Commens Dictionary of Peirce's Terms. Peirce also harshly criticized the Cartesian approach of starting from hyperbolic doubts rather than from the combination of established beliefs and genuine doubts. See the opening of his 1868 "Some Consequences of Four Incapacities", Journal of Speculative Philosophy v. 2, n. 3, pp. 140–157. Reprinted Collected Papers v. 5, paragraphs 264–317, Writings v. 2, pp. 211–242, and Essential Peirce v. 1, pp. 28–55. Eprint.

iu.edu

arisbe.sitehost.iu.edu

jmu.edu

falcon.jmu.edu

jstor.org

nih.gov

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

openedition.org

books.openedition.org

osf.io

oxfordhandbooks.com

peirce.org

pragmatism.org

researchgate.net

sagepub.com

aas.sagepub.com

  • Shields, Patricia 2003. The community of Inquiry: Classical Pragmatism and Public Administration." Administration & Society 35(5): 510–538. abstract
  • Hoch C. 2006. "What Can Rorty teach an old pragmatist doing public administration or planning? Administration & Society. 38(3):389–398. abstract
  • Hildebrand, David. 2005. "Pragmatism, Neopragmatism and public administration." Administration & Society 37(3): 360–374. abstract
  • Patricia M. Shields. 2005. "Classical Pragmatism does not need an upgrade: Lessons for Public Administration." Administration & Society. 37(4):504–518. abstract

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

stanford.edu

plato.stanford.edu

  • Hookway, Christopher (August 16, 2008). "Pragmatism". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2010 ed.).
  • McKinsey, Michael (2018). "Skepticism and Content Externalism". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2018 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved March 14, 2023.
  • Goodman, Russell (October 20, 2017). "William James". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2017 ed.).

txstate.edu

ecommons.txstate.edu

  • Perez, Shivaun, "Assessing Service Learning Using Pragmatic Principles of Education: A Texas Charter School Case Study" (2000). Applied Research Projects. Texas State University Paper 76. http://ecommons.txstate.edu/arp/76
  • Alexander, Jason Fields, "Contracting Through the Lens of Classical Pragmatism: An Exploration of Local Government Contracting" (2009). Applied Research Projects. Texas State University. Paper 288. http://ecommons.txstate.edu/arp/288
  • Bartle, John R. and Shields, Patricia M., "Applying Pragmatism to Public Budgeting and Financial Management" (2008). Faculty Publications-Political Science. Paper 48. http://ecommons.txstate.edu/polsfacp/48
  • Wilson, Timothy L., "Pragmatism and Performance Measurement: An Exploration of Practices in Texas State Government" (2001). Applied Research Projects. Texas State University. Paper 71. http://ecommons.txstate.edu/arp/71
  • Howard-Watkins, Demetria C., "The Austin, Texas African-American Quality of Life Initiative as a Community of inquiry: An Exploratory Study" (2006). Applied Research Projects. Texas State University. Paper 115. http://ecommons.txstate.edu/arp/115
  • Johnson, Timothy Lee, "The Downtown Austin Planning Process as a Community of inquiry: An Exploratory Study" (2008). Applied Research Projects. Paper 276. http://ecommons.txstate.edu/arp/276.

digital.library.txstate.edu

utm.edu

iep.utm.edu

wikisource.org

en.wikisource.org

  • Peirce, C.S. (1878), "How to Make Our Ideas Clear", Popular Science Monthly, v. 12, 286–302. Reprinted often, including Collected Papers v. 5, paragraphs 388–410 and Essential Peirce v. 1, 124–141. See end of §II for the pragmatic maxim. See third and fourth paragraphs in §IV for the discoverability of truth and the real by sufficient investigation.
  • James, William (1898), "Philosophical Conceptions and Practical Results", delivered before the Philosophical Union of the University of California at Berkeley, August 26, 1898, and first printed in the University Chronicle 1, September 1898, pp. 287–310. Internet Archive Eprint. On p. 290:

    I refer to Mr. Charles S. Peirce, with whose very existence as a philosopher I dare say many of you are unacquainted. He is one of the most original of contemporary thinkers; and the principle of practicalism or pragmatism, as he called it, when I first heard him enunciate it at Cambridge in the early [1870s] is the clue or compass by following which I find myself more and more confirmed in believing we may keep our feet upon the proper trail.

    James credited Peirce again in 1906 lectures published in 1907 as Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking, see Lecture 2, fourth paragraph.

  • Peirce, C.S. (1877), The Fixation of Belief, Popular Science Monthly, v. 12, pp. 1–15. Reprited often, including Collected Papers v. 5, paragraphs 358–387 and Essential Peirce v. 1, pp. 109–123).
  • Peirce, C. S. (1908). "A Neglected Argument for the Reality of God", Hibbert Journal 7, reprinted in Collected Papers v. 6, paragraphs 452–85, and in Essential Peirce v. 2, 434–450, and elsewhere. After discussing James, Peirce stated (Section V, fourth paragraph) as the specific occasion of his coinage "pragmaticism", journalist, pragmatist, and literary author Giovanni Papini's declaration of pragmatism's indefinability: see, for example, Papini's "What Is Pragmatism Like", published in translation in October 1907 in Popular Science Monthly v. 71, pp. 351–358.

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org