Predatory pricing (English Wikipedia)

"Predatory Price". Australian Competition and Consumer Commission Update. 2005. Archived from the original on 29 June 2022. Retrieved 1 November 2020.

books.google.com (Global: 3^rd place; English: 3^rd place)

Harold Demsetz (October 14, 1997). The Economics of the Business Firm: Seven Critical Commentaries. Cambridge University Press. p. 147. ISBN 9780521588652. Archived from the original on June 29, 2022. Retrieved December 25, 2021 – via Google Books.

case.edu (Global: 4,134^th place; English: 2,609^th place)

scholarlycommons.law.case.edu

Craswell, Richard; Fratrik, Mark (1985-01-01). "Predatory Pricing Theory Applied: The Case of Supermarkets vs. Warehouse Stores". Case Western Reserve Law Review. 36 (1): 1. ISSN 0008-7262.
Craswell, Richard; Fratrik, Mark (1985-01-01). "Predatory Pricing Theory Applied: The Case of Supermarkets vs. Warehouse Stores". Case Western Reserve Law Review. 36 (1): 1. ISSN 0008-7262.

cato.org (Global: 4,789^th place; English: 3,253^rd place)

Thomas DiLorenzo. "The Myth of Predatory Pricing". Cato Institute. Archived from the original on February 23, 1997.

consultant.ru (Global: 1,001^st place; English: 8,585^th place)

"Статья 10. Запрет на злоупотребление хозяйствующим субъектом доминирующим положением / КонсультантПлюс". www.consultant.ru. Archived from the original on 2018-04-30. Retrieved 2018-04-28.

doi.org (Global: 2^nd place; English: 2^nd place)

Funk, Michael (25 July 2018). "The More Economic Approach To Predatory Pricing" (PDF). Journal of Competition Law & Economics. 14 (2): 292–310. doi:10.1093/joclec/nhy008 – via Advanced Access publication.
Ursic, Micaheal L. (1994). "Using Price as a Weapon: An Economic and Legal Analysis of Predatory Pricing". Industrial Marketing Management. 23: 125–131. doi:10.1016/0019-8501(94)90013-2 – via Elsevier Science Inc.
Areeda, Phillip; Turner, Donald (1975). "Predatory Pricing and Related Practices under Section 2 of the Sherman Act". Harvard Law Review. 88 (4): 697–733. doi:10.2307/1340237. JSTOR 1340237.
Williamson, Oliver E. (1977). "Predatory Pricing: A Strategic and Welfare Analysis" (PDF). The Yale Law Journal. 87 (2): 284–340. doi:10.2307/795652. ISSN 0044-0094.
Williamson, Oliver E. (1981). "Predatory Pricing Rules: A Comment on Williamson's Output Restriction Rule: Reply to Lefever". The Yale Law Journal. 90 (7): 1646–1649. doi:10.2307/796084. ISSN 0044-0094.
Joskow, Paul L.; Klevorick, Alvin K. (1979). "A Framework for Analyzing Predatory Pricing Policy" (PDF). The Yale Law Journal. 89 (2): 213–270. doi:10.2307/795837. ISSN 0044-0094.
McGee, John (April 1958), "Predatory Price Cutting: The Standard Oil (N.J.) Case", Journal of Law and Economics, 1: 137–169, doi:10.1086/466547, S2CID 153539977

europa.eu (Global: 68^th place; English: 117^th place)

eur-lex.europa.eu

"Guidance on the Commission's Enforcement Priorities in Applying Article 82 of the EC Treaty to Abusive Exclusionary Conduct by Dominant Undertakings". European Commission. February 24, 2009. Paragraph 63. Archived from the original on March 19, 2020. Retrieved April 22, 2020.
Case 202/07 P Archived 2021-03-09 at the Wayback Machine, France Télécom SA v Commission of the European Communities [2009] ECR I-02369, para 111
Case 62/86 Archived 2021-03-08 at the Wayback Machine, AKZO Chemie BV v Commission of the European Communities [1991] ECR I-03359, para 71
Case 333/94 P Archived 2021-03-08 at the Wayback Machine, Tetra Pak International SA v Commission of the European Communities [1996] ECR I-5951, para 44
"Guidance on the Commission's Enforcement Priorities in Applying Article 82 of the EC Treaty to Abusive Exclusionary Conduct by Dominant Undertakings". European Commission. February 24, 2009. Paragraph 71. Archived from the original on March 19, 2020. Retrieved April 22, 2020.
Case 62/86 Archived 2021-03-08 at the Wayback Machine, AKZO Chemie BV v Commission of the European Communities [1991] ECR I-03359, para 72
Case 85/76 Archived 2021-03-08 at the Wayback Machine, Hoffmann-La Roche & Co. AG v Commission of the European Communities [1979] ECR II-00461, para 91
ECS/AKZO (IV/30.698 Archived 2021-03-08 at the Wayback Machine) Commission decision of 14 December 1985, para 76
Case 62/86 Archived 2021-03-08 at the Wayback Machine, AKZO Chemie BV v Commission of the European Communities [1991] ECR I-03359, para 65
ECS/AKZO (IV/30.698 Archived 2021-03-08 at the Wayback Machine) Commission decision of 14 December 1985, para 79
Case 333/94 P Archived 2021-03-08 at the Wayback Machine, Tetra Pak International SA v Commission of the European Communities [1996] ECR I-5951, para 41
Case 202/07 P Archived 2021-03-09 at the Wayback Machine, France Télécom SA v Commission of the European Communities [2009] ECR I-2369, para 8
Case 209/10 Archived 2021-03-08 at the Wayback Machine, Post Danmark A/S v Konkurrencerådet [2012] EU:C:2012:172, para 44
"Guidance on the Commission's Enforcement Priorities in Applying Article 82 of the EC Treaty to Abusive Exclusionary Conduct by Dominant Undertakings". European Commission. February 24, 2009. Paragraph 26. Archived from the original on March 19, 2020. Retrieved April 22, 2020.
"Consolidated Version of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union [2008] OJ C115/01, Article 102". May 9, 2008. Archived from the original on May 2, 2020. Retrieved April 22, 2020.
"Guidance on the Commission's Enforcement Priorities in Applying Article 82 of the EC Treaty to Abusive Exclusionary Conduct by Dominant Undertakings". European Commission. February 24, 2009. Paragraph 7. Archived from the original on March 19, 2020. Retrieved April 22, 2020.
"Guidance on the Commission's Enforcement Priorities in Applying Article 82 of the EC Treaty to Abusive Exclusionary Conduct by Dominant Undertakings". European Commission. February 24, 2009. Paragraph 23. Archived from the original on March 19, 2020. Retrieved April 22, 2020.
"Guidance on the Commission's Enforcement Priorities in Applying Article 82 of the EC Treaty to Abusive Exclusionary Conduct by Dominant Undertakings". European Commission. February 24, 2009. Paragraph 24. Archived from the original on March 19, 2020. Retrieved April 22, 2020.
Case 209/10 Archived 2021-03-08 at the Wayback Machine, Post Danmark A/S v Konkurrencerådet [2012] EU:C:2012:172, para 22
Case 62/86 Archived 2021-03-08 at the Wayback Machine, AKZO Chemie BV v Commission of the European Communities [1991] ECR I-03359, para 10
Case 333/94 P Archived 2021-03-08 at the Wayback Machine, Tetra Pak International SA v Commission of the European Communities [1996] ECR I-5951, para 52

ec.europa.eu

Wanadoo Interactive (Case COMP/38.233 Archived 2021-03-08 at the Wayback Machine) Commission decision of 16 July 2003, para 271
"DG Competition Discussion Paper on the Application of Article 82 of the Treaty to Exclusionary Abuses" (PDF). Brussels: European Commission. 2005. Paragraph 130. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 23, 2020. Retrieved April 22, 2020.
"DG Competition Discussion Paper on the Application of Article 82 of the Treaty to Exclusionary Abuses" (PDF). Brussels: European Commission. 2005. Paragraph 131. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 23, 2020. Retrieved April 22, 2020.
"DG Competition Discussion Paper on the Application of Article 82 of the Treaty to Exclusionary Abuses" (PDF). Brussels: European Commission. 2005. Paragraph 133. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 23, 2020. Retrieved April 22, 2020.
Wanadoo Interactive (Case COMP/38.233 Archived 2021-03-08 at the Wayback Machine) Commission decision of 16 July 2003, para 409
Wanadoo Interactive (Case COMP/38.233 Archived 2021-03-08 at the Wayback Machine) Commission decision of 16 July 2003, para 257

curia.europa.eu

Case C-23/14 Archived 2020-08-06 at the Wayback Machine, Post Danmark A/S v Konkurrencerådet EU:C:2015:651, para 52

fdic.gov (Global: 6,685^th place; English: 3,811^th place)

FDIC Consumer Compliance Examination Manual (PDF). June 2019. pp. II - 2.1. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2021-03-20. Retrieved 2020-11-04.

findlaw.com (Global: 1,478^th place; English: 868^th place)

caselaw.lp.findlaw.com

Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 113 S. Ct. 2578, 2589, vol. 209, 1993, archived from the original on 2012-10-18, retrieved 2006-01-31

forbes.com (Global: 54^th place; English: 48^th place)

Sowell, Thomas (May 3, 1999). "Predatory prosecution". Forbes. Archived from the original on July 29, 2017. Retrieved September 8, 2017.

france24.com (Global: 481^st place; English: 508^th place)

"Amazon snubs French free delivery ban with one-cent charge". France 24. July 11, 2014. Archived from the original on October 14, 2017. Retrieved October 14, 2017.

iht.com (Global: 1,663^rd place; English: 1,167^th place)

Victoria Shannon (January 14, 2008), Amazon.com is challenging French competition law, International Herald Tribune, archived from the original on 2008-01-15, retrieved 2009-03-16

jstor.org (Global: 26^th place; English: 20^th place)

Areeda, Phillip; Turner, Donald (1975). "Predatory Pricing and Related Practices under Section 2 of the Sherman Act". Harvard Law Review. 88 (4): 697–733. doi:10.2307/1340237. JSTOR 1340237.
Williamson, Oliver E. (1981). "Predatory Pricing Rules: A Comment on Williamson's Output Restriction Rule: Reply to Lefever". The Yale Law Journal. 90 (7): 1646–1649. doi:10.2307/796084. ISSN 0044-0094.

justia.com (Global: 696^th place; English: 428^th place)

supreme.justia.com

"Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 509 U.S. 209 (1993)". Justia Law. Retrieved 2023-04-24.

justice.gc.ca (Global: 2,540^th place; English: 1,620^th place)

laws-lois.justice.gc.ca

"Competition Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-34)". laws-lois.justice.gc.ca. Archived from the original on 2011-07-16.

laws.justice.gc.ca

"Definition of anti-competitive act". Competition Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-34). Department of Justice. Archived from the original on 2017-09-13. Retrieved 2017-09-13.

justice.gov (Global: 918^th place; English: 556^th place)

"Predatory Pricing: Strategic Theory and Legal Policy". Department of Justice. 25 June 2015. Archived from the original on 7 October 2017. Retrieved 7 October 2017.

kluwerlawonline.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

Agrawal, Akanshha (2021-03-01). "Predatory Pricing and Platform Competition in India". World Competition. 44 (1). ISSN 1011-4548.

konkurrensverket.se (Global: low place; English: low place)

Swedish Competition Authority. (n.d.). Prohibited agreements. Retrieved from https://www.konkurrensverket.se/en/law--guidance/prohibited-agreements/

kxmc.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

Target matches WalMart's drug cuts; state law limits discounts, Associated Press, September 29, 2007, archived from the original on 2009-04-26, retrieved 2009-03-16

legislation.gov.au (Global: 6,658^th place; English: 4,027^th place)

Education. "Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011". www.legislation.gov.au. Retrieved 2023-04-24.

legislation.gov.uk (Global: 809^th place; English: 536^th place)

"Competition Act 1998". www.legislation.gov.uk. Archived from the original on 2018-04-30. Retrieved 2018-04-28.

manupatrafast.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

"Manupatra Articles". www.manupatrafast.com. Archived from the original on 2016-12-20. Retrieved 2016-12-12.

nytimes.com (Global: 7^th place; English: 7^th place)

Edmund L. Andrews (September 9, 2000), "Germany Says Wal-Mart Must Raise Prices", New York Times, archived from the original on 2013-03-07, retrieved 2009-03-16

oecd.org (Global: 960^th place; English: 854^th place)

stats.oecd.org

"Glossary of Statistical Terms". OECD. January 3, 2002. Archived from the original on August 6, 2020. Retrieved April 22, 2020.

oecd.org

"Predatory Pricing" (PDF). OECD. 1989. Archived (PDF) from the original on September 3, 2020. Retrieved April 22, 2020.

semanticscholar.org (Global: 11^th place; English: 8^th place)

api.semanticscholar.org

McGee, John (April 1958), "Predatory Price Cutting: The Standard Oil (N.J.) Case", Journal of Law and Economics, 1: 137–169, doi:10.1086/466547, S2CID 153539977

swiss-economics.ch (Global: low place; English: low place)

Funk, Michael (25 July 2018). "The More Economic Approach To Predatory Pricing" (PDF). Journal of Competition Law & Economics. 14 (2): 292–310. doi:10.1093/joclec/nhy008 – via Advanced Access publication.

web.archive.org (Global: 1^st place; English: 1^st place)

"Glossary of Statistical Terms". OECD. January 3, 2002. Archived from the original on August 6, 2020. Retrieved April 22, 2020.
"Guidance on the Commission's Enforcement Priorities in Applying Article 82 of the EC Treaty to Abusive Exclusionary Conduct by Dominant Undertakings". European Commission. February 24, 2009. Paragraph 63. Archived from the original on March 19, 2020. Retrieved April 22, 2020.
"Predatory Pricing" (PDF). OECD. 1989. Archived (PDF) from the original on September 3, 2020. Retrieved April 22, 2020.
FDIC Consumer Compliance Examination Manual (PDF). June 2019. pp. II - 2.1. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2021-03-20. Retrieved 2020-11-04.
Case 202/07 P Archived 2021-03-09 at the Wayback Machine, France Télécom SA v Commission of the European Communities [2009] ECR I-02369, para 111
Case 62/86 Archived 2021-03-08 at the Wayback Machine, AKZO Chemie BV v Commission of the European Communities [1991] ECR I-03359, para 71
Case 333/94 P Archived 2021-03-08 at the Wayback Machine, Tetra Pak International SA v Commission of the European Communities [1996] ECR I-5951, para 44
"Guidance on the Commission's Enforcement Priorities in Applying Article 82 of the EC Treaty to Abusive Exclusionary Conduct by Dominant Undertakings". European Commission. February 24, 2009. Paragraph 71. Archived from the original on March 19, 2020. Retrieved April 22, 2020.
Case 62/86 Archived 2021-03-08 at the Wayback Machine, AKZO Chemie BV v Commission of the European Communities [1991] ECR I-03359, para 72
Wanadoo Interactive (Case COMP/38.233 Archived 2021-03-08 at the Wayback Machine) Commission decision of 16 July 2003, para 271
Case 85/76 Archived 2021-03-08 at the Wayback Machine, Hoffmann-La Roche & Co. AG v Commission of the European Communities [1979] ECR II-00461, para 91
ECS/AKZO (IV/30.698 Archived 2021-03-08 at the Wayback Machine) Commission decision of 14 December 1985, para 76
Case 62/86 Archived 2021-03-08 at the Wayback Machine, AKZO Chemie BV v Commission of the European Communities [1991] ECR I-03359, para 65
ECS/AKZO (IV/30.698 Archived 2021-03-08 at the Wayback Machine) Commission decision of 14 December 1985, para 79
Case 333/94 P Archived 2021-03-08 at the Wayback Machine, Tetra Pak International SA v Commission of the European Communities [1996] ECR I-5951, para 41
Case 202/07 P Archived 2021-03-09 at the Wayback Machine, France Télécom SA v Commission of the European Communities [2009] ECR I-2369, para 8
Case 209/10 Archived 2021-03-08 at the Wayback Machine, Post Danmark A/S v Konkurrencerådet [2012] EU:C:2012:172, para 44
"Guidance on the Commission's Enforcement Priorities in Applying Article 82 of the EC Treaty to Abusive Exclusionary Conduct by Dominant Undertakings". European Commission. February 24, 2009. Paragraph 26. Archived from the original on March 19, 2020. Retrieved April 22, 2020.
Case C-23/14 Archived 2020-08-06 at the Wayback Machine, Post Danmark A/S v Konkurrencerådet EU:C:2015:651, para 52
Carrier, MA 2019, 'The Four-Step Rule of Reason,' Antitrust, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 50-51, viewed 2 May 2022, < https://www.antitrustinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/ANTITRUST-4-step-RoR.pdf Archived 2022-04-17 at the Wayback Machine>
Carrier, MA 2019, 'The Four-Step Rule of Reason,' Antitrust, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 50-51, viewed 2 May 2022, < https://www.antitrustinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/ANTITRUST-4-step-RoR.pdf Archived 2022-04-17 at the Wayback Machine>.
"Predatory Price". Australian Competition and Consumer Commission Update. 2005. Archived from the original on 29 June 2022. Retrieved 1 November 2020.
Predatory pricing laws shock big operators, ABC Australia, 2007-10-04, archived from the original on 2009-01-13, retrieved 2009-03-16
"Competition Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-34)". laws-lois.justice.gc.ca. Archived from the original on 2011-07-16.
"Definition of anti-competitive act". Competition Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-34). Department of Justice. Archived from the original on 2017-09-13. Retrieved 2017-09-13.
Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 113 S. Ct. 2578, 2589, vol. 209, 1993, archived from the original on 2012-10-18, retrieved 2006-01-31
"Predatory Pricing: Strategic Theory and Legal Policy". Department of Justice. 25 June 2015. Archived from the original on 7 October 2017. Retrieved 7 October 2017.
"Consolidated Version of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union [2008] OJ C115/01, Article 102". May 9, 2008. Archived from the original on May 2, 2020. Retrieved April 22, 2020.
"Guidance on the Commission's Enforcement Priorities in Applying Article 82 of the EC Treaty to Abusive Exclusionary Conduct by Dominant Undertakings". European Commission. February 24, 2009. Paragraph 7. Archived from the original on March 19, 2020. Retrieved April 22, 2020.
"Guidance on the Commission's Enforcement Priorities in Applying Article 82 of the EC Treaty to Abusive Exclusionary Conduct by Dominant Undertakings". European Commission. February 24, 2009. Paragraph 23. Archived from the original on March 19, 2020. Retrieved April 22, 2020.
"Guidance on the Commission's Enforcement Priorities in Applying Article 82 of the EC Treaty to Abusive Exclusionary Conduct by Dominant Undertakings". European Commission. February 24, 2009. Paragraph 24. Archived from the original on March 19, 2020. Retrieved April 22, 2020.
"Manupatra Articles". www.manupatrafast.com. Archived from the original on 2016-12-20. Retrieved 2016-12-12.
"Статья 10. Запрет на злоупотребление хозяйствующим субъектом доминирующим положением / КонсультантПлюс". www.consultant.ru. Archived from the original on 2018-04-30. Retrieved 2018-04-28.
"Competition Act 1998". www.legislation.gov.uk. Archived from the original on 2018-04-30. Retrieved 2018-04-28.
Thomas DiLorenzo. "The Myth of Predatory Pricing". Cato Institute. Archived from the original on February 23, 1997.
Sowell, Thomas (May 3, 1999). "Predatory prosecution". Forbes. Archived from the original on July 29, 2017. Retrieved September 8, 2017.
Harold Demsetz (October 14, 1997). The Economics of the Business Firm: Seven Critical Commentaries. Cambridge University Press. p. 147. ISBN 9780521588652. Archived from the original on June 29, 2022. Retrieved December 25, 2021 – via Google Books.
Case 209/10 Archived 2021-03-08 at the Wayback Machine, Post Danmark A/S v Konkurrencerådet [2012] EU:C:2012:172, para 22
"DG Competition Discussion Paper on the Application of Article 82 of the Treaty to Exclusionary Abuses" (PDF). Brussels: European Commission. 2005. Paragraph 130. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 23, 2020. Retrieved April 22, 2020.
"DG Competition Discussion Paper on the Application of Article 82 of the Treaty to Exclusionary Abuses" (PDF). Brussels: European Commission. 2005. Paragraph 131. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 23, 2020. Retrieved April 22, 2020.
"DG Competition Discussion Paper on the Application of Article 82 of the Treaty to Exclusionary Abuses" (PDF). Brussels: European Commission. 2005. Paragraph 133. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 23, 2020. Retrieved April 22, 2020.
Case 62/86 Archived 2021-03-08 at the Wayback Machine, AKZO Chemie BV v Commission of the European Communities [1991] ECR I-03359, para 10
Case 333/94 P Archived 2021-03-08 at the Wayback Machine, Tetra Pak International SA v Commission of the European Communities [1996] ECR I-5951, para 52
Wanadoo Interactive (Case COMP/38.233 Archived 2021-03-08 at the Wayback Machine) Commission decision of 16 July 2003, para 409
Wanadoo Interactive (Case COMP/38.233 Archived 2021-03-08 at the Wayback Machine) Commission decision of 16 July 2003, para 257
Target matches WalMart's drug cuts; state law limits discounts, Associated Press, September 29, 2007, archived from the original on 2009-04-26, retrieved 2009-03-16
Edmund L. Andrews (September 9, 2000), "Germany Says Wal-Mart Must Raise Prices", New York Times, archived from the original on 2013-03-07, retrieved 2009-03-16
Victoria Shannon (January 14, 2008), Amazon.com is challenging French competition law, International Herald Tribune, archived from the original on 2008-01-15, retrieved 2009-03-16
"Amazon snubs French free delivery ban with one-cent charge". France 24. July 11, 2014. Archived from the original on October 14, 2017. Retrieved October 14, 2017.
Mattioli, Dana (22 December 2020). "How Amazon Wins: By Steamrolling Rivals and Partners". Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 27 December 2020. Retrieved 27 December 2020.

worldcat.org (Global: 5^th place; English: 5^th place)

search.worldcat.org

Craswell, Richard; Fratrik, Mark (1985-01-01). "Predatory Pricing Theory Applied: The Case of Supermarkets vs. Warehouse Stores". Case Western Reserve Law Review. 36 (1): 1. ISSN 0008-7262.
Craswell, Richard; Fratrik, Mark (1985-01-01). "Predatory Pricing Theory Applied: The Case of Supermarkets vs. Warehouse Stores". Case Western Reserve Law Review. 36 (1): 1. ISSN 0008-7262.
Williamson, Oliver E. (1977). "Predatory Pricing: A Strategic and Welfare Analysis" (PDF). The Yale Law Journal. 87 (2): 284–340. doi:10.2307/795652. ISSN 0044-0094.
Williamson, Oliver E. (1981). "Predatory Pricing Rules: A Comment on Williamson's Output Restriction Rule: Reply to Lefever". The Yale Law Journal. 90 (7): 1646–1649. doi:10.2307/796084. ISSN 0044-0094.
Joskow, Paul L.; Klevorick, Alvin K. (1979). "A Framework for Analyzing Predatory Pricing Policy" (PDF). The Yale Law Journal. 89 (2): 213–270. doi:10.2307/795837. ISSN 0044-0094.
Agrawal, Akanshha (2021-03-01). "Predatory Pricing and Platform Competition in India". World Competition. 44 (1). ISSN 1011-4548.

wsj.com (Global: 79^th place; English: 65^th place)

Mattioli, Dana (22 December 2020). "How Amazon Wins: By Steamrolling Rivals and Partners". Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 27 December 2020. Retrieved 27 December 2020.

wto.org (Global: 3,346^th place; English: 3,227^th place)

"WTO | Anti-dumping - Technical Information". www.wto.org. Retrieved 2023-04-24.

yale.edu (Global: 565^th place; English: 460^th place)

openyls.law.yale.edu

Williamson, Oliver E. (1977). "Predatory Pricing: A Strategic and Welfare Analysis" (PDF). The Yale Law Journal. 87 (2): 284–340. doi:10.2307/795652. ISSN 0044-0094.
Joskow, Paul L.; Klevorick, Alvin K. (1979). "A Framework for Analyzing Predatory Pricing Policy" (PDF). The Yale Law Journal. 89 (2): 213–270. doi:10.2307/795837. ISSN 0044-0094.

Predatory pricing (English Wikipedia)

abc.net.au (Global: 139th place; English: 108th place)

advertisingbusiness.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

antitrustinstitute.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

austlii.edu.au (Global: 1,812th place; English: 995th place)

books.google.com (Global: 3rd place; English: 3rd place)

case.edu (Global: 4,134th place; English: 2,609th place)

scholarlycommons.law.case.edu

cato.org (Global: 4,789th place; English: 3,253rd place)

consultant.ru (Global: 1,001st place; English: 8,585th place)

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; English: 2nd place)

europa.eu (Global: 68th place; English: 117th place)

eur-lex.europa.eu

ec.europa.eu

curia.europa.eu

fdic.gov (Global: 6,685th place; English: 3,811th place)

findlaw.com (Global: 1,478th place; English: 868th place)

caselaw.lp.findlaw.com

forbes.com (Global: 54th place; English: 48th place)

france24.com (Global: 481st place; English: 508th place)

iht.com (Global: 1,663rd place; English: 1,167th place)

jstor.org (Global: 26th place; English: 20th place)

justia.com (Global: 696th place; English: 428th place)

supreme.justia.com

justice.gc.ca (Global: 2,540th place; English: 1,620th place)

laws-lois.justice.gc.ca

laws.justice.gc.ca

justice.gov (Global: 918th place; English: 556th place)

kluwerlawonline.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

konkurrensverket.se (Global: low place; English: low place)

kxmc.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

legislation.gov.au (Global: 6,658th place; English: 4,027th place)

legislation.gov.uk (Global: 809th place; English: 536th place)

manupatrafast.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

nytimes.com (Global: 7th place; English: 7th place)

oecd.org (Global: 960th place; English: 854th place)

stats.oecd.org

oecd.org

semanticscholar.org (Global: 11th place; English: 8th place)

api.semanticscholar.org

swiss-economics.ch (Global: low place; English: low place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; English: 1st place)

worldcat.org (Global: 5th place; English: 5th place)

search.worldcat.org

wsj.com (Global: 79th place; English: 65th place)

wto.org (Global: 3,346th place; English: 3,227th place)

yale.edu (Global: 565th place; English: 460th place)

openyls.law.yale.edu

abc.net.au (Global: 139^th place; English: 108^th place)

austlii.edu.au (Global: 1,812^th place; English: 995^th place)

books.google.com (Global: 3^rd place; English: 3^rd place)

case.edu (Global: 4,134^th place; English: 2,609^th place)

cato.org (Global: 4,789^th place; English: 3,253^rd place)

consultant.ru (Global: 1,001^st place; English: 8,585^th place)

doi.org (Global: 2^nd place; English: 2^nd place)

europa.eu (Global: 68^th place; English: 117^th place)

fdic.gov (Global: 6,685^th place; English: 3,811^th place)

findlaw.com (Global: 1,478^th place; English: 868^th place)

forbes.com (Global: 54^th place; English: 48^th place)

france24.com (Global: 481^st place; English: 508^th place)

iht.com (Global: 1,663^rd place; English: 1,167^th place)

jstor.org (Global: 26^th place; English: 20^th place)

justia.com (Global: 696^th place; English: 428^th place)

justice.gc.ca (Global: 2,540^th place; English: 1,620^th place)

justice.gov (Global: 918^th place; English: 556^th place)

legislation.gov.au (Global: 6,658^th place; English: 4,027^th place)

legislation.gov.uk (Global: 809^th place; English: 536^th place)

nytimes.com (Global: 7^th place; English: 7^th place)

oecd.org (Global: 960^th place; English: 854^th place)

semanticscholar.org (Global: 11^th place; English: 8^th place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1^st place; English: 1^st place)

worldcat.org (Global: 5^th place; English: 5^th place)

wsj.com (Global: 79^th place; English: 65^th place)

wto.org (Global: 3,346^th place; English: 3,227^th place)

yale.edu (Global: 565^th place; English: 460^th place)