Probability interpretations (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Probability interpretations" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

5doi.org

2^nd place

4books.google.com

3^rd place

2archive.org

6^th place

2elte.hu

5,814^th place

7,639^th place

2web.archive.org

1^st place

1stanford.edu

179^th place

183^rd place

1harvard.edu

18^th place

17^th place

1semanticscholar.org

11^th place

8^th place

1fitelson.org

low place

1gutenberg.org

489^th place

377^th place

1uci.edu

3,063^rd place

2,041^st place

1psu.edu

207^th place

136^th place

1umn.edu

1,266^th place

860^th place

1jstor.org

26^th place

20^th place

1nlx.com

low place

1sciencedirect.com

149^th place

178^th place

archive.org (Global: 6^th place; English: 6^th place)

Savage, L.J. (1954). The foundations of statistics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN 978-0-486-62349-8. {{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help)
Burks, Arthur W. (1978). Chance, Cause and Reason: An Inquiry into the Nature of Scientific Evidence. University of Chicago Press. pp. 694 pages. ISBN 978-0-226-08087-1.

books.google.com (Global: 3^rd place; English: 3^rd place)

Venn, John (1876). The Logic of Chance. London: MacMillan.
Simon French; John Maule; Nadia Papamichail (2009). Decision Behaviour, Analysis and Support. Cambridge University Press. p. 221. ISBN 978-1-139-48098-7.
Nils-Eric Sahlin (2013). "2. On Higher Order Beliefs". In J. P. Dubucs (ed.). Philosophy of Probability. Springer. p. 30. ISBN 978-94-015-8208-7.
Geisser, Seymour (1993). Predictive Inference. CRC Press. ISBN 978-0-412-03471-8.

doi.org (Global: 2^nd place; English: 2^nd place)

de Elía, Ramón; Laprise, René (2005). "Diversity in interpretations of probability: implications for weather forecasting". Monthly Weather Review. 133 (5): 1129–1143. Bibcode:2005MWRv..133.1129D. doi:10.1175/mwr2913.1. S2CID 123135127. "There are several schools of thought regarding the interpretation of probabilities, none of them without flaws, internal contradictions, or paradoxes." (p 1129) "There are no standard classifications of probability interpretations, and even the more popular ones may suffer subtle variations from text to text." (p 1130)
Grove, William M.; Meehl, Paul E. (1996). "Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy" (PDF). Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 2 (2): 293–332. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.471.592. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.2.2.293. Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 October 2011. Statistical decisions are consistently superior to the subjective decisions of experts.
Miller, Richard W. (1975). "Propensity: Popper or Peirce?". British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 26 (2): 123–132. doi:10.1093/bjps/26.2.123.
Haack, Susan; Kolenda, Konstantin, Konstantin; Kolenda (1977). "Two Fallibilists in Search of the Truth". Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 51 (Supplementary Volumes): 63–104. doi:10.1093/aristoteliansupp/51.1.63. JSTOR 4106816.
Ronald N. Giere (1973). "Objective Single Case Probabilities and the Foundations of Statistics". Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics. Vol. 73. Elsevier. pp. 467–483. doi:10.1016/S0049-237X(09)70380-5. ISBN 978-0-444-10491-5.

elte.hu (Global: 5,814^th place; English: 7,639^th place)

philosophy.elte.hu

Laszlo E. Szabo, A Physicalist Interpretation of Probability Archived 4 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine (Talk presented on the Philosophy of Science Seminar, Eötvös, Budapest, 8 October 2001.)
Laszlo E. Szabo, Objective probability-like things with and without objective indeterminism, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 38 (2007) 626–634 (Preprint)

fitelson.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

Ramsey, F. P. (1931). "Chapter VII, Truth and Probability (1926)" (PDF). In Braithwaite, R. B. (ed.). Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays. London: Kegan, Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co. pp. 156–198. Retrieved 15 August 2013. Contains three chapters (essays) by Ramsey. The electronic version contains only those three.

gutenberg.org (Global: 489^th place; English: 377^th place)

Keynes, John Maynard (1921). A Treatise on Probability. MacMillan. Retrieved 15 August 2013.

harvard.edu (Global: 18^th place; English: 17^th place)

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

de Elía, Ramón; Laprise, René (2005). "Diversity in interpretations of probability: implications for weather forecasting". Monthly Weather Review. 133 (5): 1129–1143. Bibcode:2005MWRv..133.1129D. doi:10.1175/mwr2913.1. S2CID 123135127. "There are several schools of thought regarding the interpretation of probabilities, none of them without flaws, internal contradictions, or paradoxes." (p 1129) "There are no standard classifications of probability interpretations, and even the more popular ones may suffer subtle variations from text to text." (p 1130)

jstor.org (Global: 26^th place; English: 20^th place)

Haack, Susan; Kolenda, Konstantin, Konstantin; Kolenda (1977). "Two Fallibilists in Search of the Truth". Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 51 (Supplementary Volumes): 63–104. doi:10.1093/aristoteliansupp/51.1.63. JSTOR 4106816.

nlx.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

Peirce, Charles Sanders and Burks, Arthur W., ed. (1958), the Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce Volumes 7 and 8, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, also Belnap Press (of Harvard University Press) edition, vols. 7-8 bound together, 798 pages, online via InteLex, reprinted in 1998 Thoemmes Continuum.

psu.edu (Global: 207^th place; English: 136^th place)

citeseerx.ist.psu.edu

Grove, William M.; Meehl, Paul E. (1996). "Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy" (PDF). Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 2 (2): 293–332. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.471.592. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.2.2.293. Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 October 2011. Statistical decisions are consistently superior to the subjective decisions of experts.

sciencedirect.com (Global: 149^th place; English: 178^th place)

Ronald N. Giere (1973). "Objective Single Case Probabilities and the Foundations of Statistics". Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics. Vol. 73. Elsevier. pp. 467–483. doi:10.1016/S0049-237X(09)70380-5. ISBN 978-0-444-10491-5.

semanticscholar.org (Global: 11^th place; English: 8^th place)

api.semanticscholar.org

de Elía, Ramón; Laprise, René (2005). "Diversity in interpretations of probability: implications for weather forecasting". Monthly Weather Review. 133 (5): 1129–1143. Bibcode:2005MWRv..133.1129D. doi:10.1175/mwr2913.1. S2CID 123135127. "There are several schools of thought regarding the interpretation of probabilities, none of them without flaws, internal contradictions, or paradoxes." (p 1129) "There are no standard classifications of probability interpretations, and even the more popular ones may suffer subtle variations from text to text." (p 1130)

stanford.edu (Global: 179^th place; English: 183^rd place)

plato.stanford.edu

Hájek, Alan (21 October 2002), Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), Interpretations of Probability, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University

uci.edu (Global: 3,063^rd place; English: 2,041^st place)

socsci.uci.edu

Fermat and Pascal on Probability (@ socsci.uci.edu)

umn.edu (Global: 1,266^th place; English: 860^th place)

tc.umn.edu

Grove, William M.; Meehl, Paul E. (1996). "Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy" (PDF). Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 2 (2): 293–332. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.471.592. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.2.2.293. Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 October 2011. Statistical decisions are consistently superior to the subjective decisions of experts.

web.archive.org (Global: 1^st place; English: 1^st place)

Laszlo E. Szabo, A Physicalist Interpretation of Probability Archived 4 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine (Talk presented on the Philosophy of Science Seminar, Eötvös, Budapest, 8 October 2001.)
Grove, William M.; Meehl, Paul E. (1996). "Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy" (PDF). Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 2 (2): 293–332. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.471.592. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.2.2.293. Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 October 2011. Statistical decisions are consistently superior to the subjective decisions of experts.

Probability interpretations (English Wikipedia)

archive.org (Global: 6th place; English: 6th place)

books.google.com (Global: 3rd place; English: 3rd place)

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; English: 2nd place)

elte.hu (Global: 5,814th place; English: 7,639th place)

philosophy.elte.hu

fitelson.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

gutenberg.org (Global: 489th place; English: 377th place)

harvard.edu (Global: 18th place; English: 17th place)