Problem of evil (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Problem of evil" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
3rd place
3rd place
2nd place
2nd place
11th place
8th place
26th place
20th place
6th place
6th place
179th place
183rd place
5th place
5th place
1st place
1st place
222nd place
297th place
low place
low place
507th place
429th place
1,379th place
1,175th place
low place
low place
206th place
124th place
489th place
377th place
1,865th place
1,260th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
102nd place
76th place
low place
low place
70th place
63rd place
low place
low place
305th place
264th place
4th place
4th place
low place
low place
low place
8,570th place
2,821st place
2,253rd place
low place
low place
9,200th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
207th place
136th place
3,951st place
2,391st place
1,830th place
1,066th place
850th place
625th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
40th place
58th place
1,349th place
866th place
139th place
108th place
1,898th place
2,434th place

abc.net.au (Global: 139th place; English: 108th place)

acadiau.ca (Global: low place; English: low place)

philosophy.acadiau.ca

  • "Ordinary Morality Implies Atheism", European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 1:2 (2009), 107–126, Quote: "... may stem from imagining an ecstatic or forgiving state of mind on the part of the blissful: in heaven no one bears grudges, even the most horrific earthly suffering is as nothing compared to infinite bliss, all past wrongs are forgiven. But "are forgiven" doesn't mean "were justified"; the blissful person's disinclination to dwell on his or her earthly suffering doesn't imply that a perfect being was justified in permitting the suffering all along. By the same token, our ordinary moral practice recognizes a legitimate complaint about child abuse even if, as adults, its victims should happen to be on drugs that make them uninterested in complaining. Even if heaven swamps everything, it doesn't thereby justify everything."

archive.org (Global: 6th place; English: 6th place)

books.google.com (Global: 3rd place; English: 3rd place)

britannica.com (Global: 40th place; English: 58th place)

  • Deism, Encyclopædia Britannica

cambridge.org (Global: 305th place; English: 264th place)

darwin-online.org.uk (Global: 2,821st place; English: 2,253rd place)

darwinproject.ac.uk (Global: low place; English: 8,570th place)

dbu.edu (Global: low place; English: low place)

www3.dbu.edu

designinference.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; English: 2nd place)

esp.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

euppublishing.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

galegroup.com (Global: 1,830th place; English: 1,066th place)

go.galegroup.com

  • Whitney, B. "Theodicy". Gale Virtual Reference Library. Gale. Retrieved 10 December 2014.

gutenberg.org (Global: 489th place; English: 377th place)

handle.net (Global: 102nd place; English: 76th place)

hdl.handle.net

hkbu.edu.hk (Global: low place; English: low place)

  • See Kant's essay, "Concerning the Possibility of a Theodicy and the Failure of All Previous Philosophical Attempts in the Field" (1791). p. 291. Stephen Palmquist explains why Kant refuses to solve the problem of evil in "Faith in the Face of Evil", Appendix VI of Kant's Critical Religion (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000).

illinois.edu (Global: 1,349th place; English: 866th place)

apq.press.illinois.edu

infidels.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

jstor.org (Global: 26th place; English: 20th place)

loc.gov (Global: 70th place; English: 63rd place)

lccn.loc.gov

  • Tuling, Kari H. (2020). "Part 1: Is God the Creator and Source of All Being – Including Evil?". In Tuling, Kari H. (ed.). Thinking about God: Jewish Views. JPS Essential Judaism Series. Lincoln and Philadelphia: University of Nebraska Press/Jewish Publication Society. pp. 3–64. doi:10.2307/j.ctv13796z1.5. ISBN 978-0-8276-1848-0. LCCN 2019042781. S2CID 241611417.

nih.gov (Global: 4th place; English: 4th place)

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

pdcnet.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

philarchive.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

philosophy-of-religion.eu (Global: low place; English: low place)

philpapers.org (Global: 1,865th place; English: 1,260th place)

proquest.com (Global: 206th place; English: 124th place)

psu.edu (Global: 207th place; English: 136th place)

citeseerx.ist.psu.edu

purdue.edu (Global: 850th place; English: 625th place)

web.ics.purdue.edu

rationalrealm.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

saintsbooks.net (Global: low place; English: low place)

sajhrm.co.za (Global: low place; English: low place)

sciendo.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

semanticscholar.org (Global: 11th place; English: 8th place)

api.semanticscholar.org

sid.ir (Global: 9,200th place; English: low place)

stanford.edu (Global: 179th place; English: 183rd place)

plato.stanford.edu

  • The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, "The Problem of Evil", Michael Tooley
  • Calder, Todd (26 November 2013). "The Concept of Evil". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University. Retrieved 17 January 2021.
  • Taliaferro, Charles. "Philosophy of Religion". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Sanford University. p. 3.1. Retrieved 7 December 2020.
  • Wierenga, Edward (2020). Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). "Omniscience". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 22 February 2021.
  • Hoffman, Joshua; Rosenkrantz, Gary. "Omnipotence". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University. Retrieved 22 February 2021.
  • Michael Tooley, "The Problem of Evil", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  • Dougherty, Trent (2018). "Skeptical Theism". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2018 Edition). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 2 February 2021.

strongatheism.net (Global: low place; English: low place)

substack.com (Global: 3,951st place; English: 2,391st place)

davidbentleyhart.substack.com

  • Hart, David Bentley (12 March 2023). "A Gregorian Interview". Leaves in the Wind. Archived from the original on 14 March 2023. Retrieved 14 March 2023. [Starting at 1:13:08:] Moral evil has no essence of its own, so it can only exist as a fabrication of the will continuing to will defectively. And according to tradition, even natural evil is the result of a world that's fallen into death. Somehow, that too follows from the creation of moral evil. So in Christian tradition, you don't just accept 'the world as it is.' You take 'the world as it is' as a broken, shadowy remnant of what it should have been. But obviously wherever this departure from the divine happened, or whenever, it didn't happen within terrestrial history. Now, plenty will argue: 'Oh no. It really happened within history.' No, it really didn't. This world, as we know it, from the Big Bang up until today, has been the world of death.

tandfonline.com (Global: 507th place; English: 429th place)

utm.edu (Global: 1,379th place; English: 1,175th place)

iep.utm.edu

web.archive.org (Global: 1st place; English: 1st place)

  • "Making the Task of Theodicy Impossible?" Archived 16 September 2012 at the Wayback Machine, William Dembski (2003), Baylor University, pp. 11, 12
  • 'Making the Task of Theodicy Impossible?" Archived 16 September 2012 at the Wayback Machine, William Dembski (2003), Baylor University, p. 12
  • Problem of Evil, Paul Brians, Washington State University
  • Hart, David Bentley (12 March 2023). "A Gregorian Interview". Leaves in the Wind. Archived from the original on 14 March 2023. Retrieved 14 March 2023. [Starting at 1:13:08:] Moral evil has no essence of its own, so it can only exist as a fabrication of the will continuing to will defectively. And according to tradition, even natural evil is the result of a world that's fallen into death. Somehow, that too follows from the creation of moral evil. So in Christian tradition, you don't just accept 'the world as it is.' You take 'the world as it is' as a broken, shadowy remnant of what it should have been. But obviously wherever this departure from the divine happened, or whenever, it didn't happen within terrestrial history. Now, plenty will argue: 'Oh no. It really happened within history.' No, it really didn't. This world, as we know it, from the Big Bang up until today, has been the world of death.
  • "The Two Types of Evil". Accessed 10 July 2014.
  • Lane, William C. (January 2010). "Leibniz's Best World Claim Restructured". American Philosophical Journal. 47 (1): 57–84. Archived from the original on 8 May 2013. Retrieved 9 March 2014.

wiley.com (Global: 222nd place; English: 297th place)

onlinelibrary.wiley.com

worldcat.org (Global: 5th place; English: 5th place)

search.worldcat.org

yadvashem.org (Global: 1,898th place; English: 2,434th place)