Problem of evil (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Problem of evil" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
3rd place
3rd place
2nd place
2nd place
11th place
8th place
26th place
20th place
6th place
6th place
179th place
183rd place
5th place
5th place
1st place
1st place
222nd place
297th place
low place
low place
507th place
429th place
1,379th place
1,175th place
low place
low place
206th place
124th place
489th place
377th place
1,865th place
1,260th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
102nd place
76th place
low place
low place
70th place
63rd place
low place
low place
305th place
264th place
4th place
4th place
low place
low place
low place
8,570th place
2,821st place
2,253rd place
low place
low place
9,200th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
207th place
136th place
3,951st place
2,391st place
8th place
10th place
1,830th place
1,066th place
850th place
625th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
40th place
58th place
1,349th place
866th place
139th place
108th place
1,898th place
2,434th place

abc.net.au

acadiau.ca

philosophy.acadiau.ca

  • "Ordinary Morality Implies Atheism", European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 1:2 (2009), 107–126, Quote: "... may stem from imagining an ecstatic or forgiving state of mind on the part of the blissful: in heaven no one bears grudges, even the most horrific earthly suffering is as nothing compared to infinite bliss, all past wrongs are forgiven. But "are forgiven" doesn't mean "were justified"; the blissful person's disinclination to dwell on his or her earthly suffering doesn't imply that a perfect being was justified in permitting the suffering all along. By the same token, our ordinary moral practice recognizes a legitimate complaint about child abuse even if, as adults, its victims should happen to be on drugs that make them uninterested in complaining. Even if heaven swamps everything, it doesn't thereby justify everything."

archive.org

bbc.co.uk

books.google.com

britannica.com

  • Deism, Encyclopædia Britannica

cambridge.org

darwin-online.org.uk

darwinproject.ac.uk

dbu.edu

www3.dbu.edu

designinference.com

doi.org

esp.org

euppublishing.com

galegroup.com

go.galegroup.com

  • Whitney, B. "Theodicy". Gale Virtual Reference Library. Gale. Retrieved 10 December 2014.

gutenberg.org

handle.net

hdl.handle.net

hkbu.edu.hk

  • See Kant's essay, "Concerning the Possibility of a Theodicy and the Failure of All Previous Philosophical Attempts in the Field" (1791). p. 291. Stephen Palmquist explains why Kant refuses to solve the problem of evil in "Faith in the Face of Evil", Appendix VI of Kant's Critical Religion (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000).

illinois.edu

apq.press.illinois.edu

infidels.org

jstor.org

loc.gov

lccn.loc.gov

  • Tuling, Kari H. (2020). "Part 1: Is God the Creator and Source of All Being – Including Evil?". In Tuling, Kari H. (ed.). Thinking about God: Jewish Views. JPS Essential Judaism Series. Lincoln and Philadelphia: University of Nebraska Press/Jewish Publication Society. pp. 3–64. doi:10.2307/j.ctv13796z1.5. ISBN 978-0-8276-1848-0. LCCN 2019042781. S2CID 241611417.

nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

pdcnet.org

philarchive.org

philosophy-of-religion.eu

philpapers.org

proquest.com

psu.edu

citeseerx.ist.psu.edu

purdue.edu

web.ics.purdue.edu

rationalrealm.com

saintsbooks.net

sajhrm.co.za

sciendo.com

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

sid.ir

stanford.edu

plato.stanford.edu

  • The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, "The Problem of Evil", Michael Tooley
  • Calder, Todd (26 November 2013). "The Concept of Evil". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University. Retrieved 17 January 2021.
  • Taliaferro, Charles. "Philosophy of Religion". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Sanford University. p. 3.1. Retrieved 7 December 2020.
  • Wierenga, Edward (2020). Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). "Omniscience". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 22 February 2021.
  • Hoffman, Joshua; Rosenkrantz, Gary. "Omnipotence". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University. Retrieved 22 February 2021.
  • Michael Tooley, "The Problem of Evil", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  • Dougherty, Trent (2018). "Skeptical Theism". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2018 Edition). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 2 February 2021.

strongatheism.net

substack.com

davidbentleyhart.substack.com

  • Hart, David Bentley (12 March 2023). "A Gregorian Interview". Leaves in the Wind. Archived from the original on 14 March 2023. Retrieved 14 March 2023. [Starting at 1:13:08:] Moral evil has no essence of its own, so it can only exist as a fabrication of the will continuing to will defectively. And according to tradition, even natural evil is the result of a world that's fallen into death. Somehow, that too follows from the creation of moral evil. So in Christian tradition, you don't just accept 'the world as it is.' You take 'the world as it is' as a broken, shadowy remnant of what it should have been. But obviously wherever this departure from the divine happened, or whenever, it didn't happen within terrestrial history. Now, plenty will argue: 'Oh no. It really happened within history.' No, it really didn't. This world, as we know it, from the Big Bang up until today, has been the world of death.

tandfonline.com

utm.edu

iep.utm.edu

web.archive.org

  • "Making the Task of Theodicy Impossible?" Archived 16 September 2012 at the Wayback Machine, William Dembski (2003), Baylor University, pp. 11, 12
  • 'Making the Task of Theodicy Impossible?" Archived 16 September 2012 at the Wayback Machine, William Dembski (2003), Baylor University, p. 12
  • Problem of Evil, Paul Brians, Washington State University
  • Hart, David Bentley (12 March 2023). "A Gregorian Interview". Leaves in the Wind. Archived from the original on 14 March 2023. Retrieved 14 March 2023. [Starting at 1:13:08:] Moral evil has no essence of its own, so it can only exist as a fabrication of the will continuing to will defectively. And according to tradition, even natural evil is the result of a world that's fallen into death. Somehow, that too follows from the creation of moral evil. So in Christian tradition, you don't just accept 'the world as it is.' You take 'the world as it is' as a broken, shadowy remnant of what it should have been. But obviously wherever this departure from the divine happened, or whenever, it didn't happen within terrestrial history. Now, plenty will argue: 'Oh no. It really happened within history.' No, it really didn't. This world, as we know it, from the Big Bang up until today, has been the world of death.
  • Lane, William C. (January 2010). "Leibniz's Best World Claim Restructured". American Philosophical Journal. 47 (1): 57–84. Archived from the original on 8 May 2013. Retrieved 9 March 2014.

wiley.com

onlinelibrary.wiley.com

worldcat.org

worldcat.org

  • Howard-Snyder, Daniel; O'Leary-Hawthorne, John (1998). "Transworld Sanctity and Plantinga's Free Will Defense". International Journal for Philosophy of Religion. 44 (1): 1–21. doi:10.1023/A:1003210017171. ISSN 1572-8684.
  • Alston, William P. (1991). "The Inductive Argument from Evil and the Human Cognitive Condition". Philosophical Perspectives. 5: 29–67. doi:10.2307/2214090. ISSN 1758-2245. JSTOR 2214090. S2CID 16744068.
  • Rowe, William (1979). "The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism". American Philosophical Quarterly. 16 (4): 335–341. ISSN 0003-0481. JSTOR 20009775p. 335
  • Beebe, James R. (2005). "Logical Problem of Evil". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. ISSN 2161-0002.

search.worldcat.org

yadvashem.org