Proportionality (law) (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Proportionality (law)" in English language version.

refsWebsite

Global rank English rank

3austlii.edu.au

1,812^th place

995^th place

3web.archive.org

1^st place

3worldcat.org

5^th place

2wikipedia.org

low place

2jhu.edu

699^th place

479^th place

2doi.org

2^nd place

2jstor.org

26^th place

20^th place

2ssrn.com

703^rd place

501^st place

2icc-cpi.int

4,988^th place

4,431^st place

1justice.gov.uk

low place

6,649^th place

1digitale-sammlungen.de

958^th place

1,915^th place

1unibe.ch

2,608^th place

3,516^th place

1findlaw.com

1,478^th place

868^th place

1cornell.edu

332^nd place

246^th place

1insidecounsel.com

low place

1americanbar.org

7,096^th place

4,044^th place

1hawaii.edu

1,308^th place

924^th place

1guide-humanitarian-law.org

low place

americanbar.org

"The Laws of War". www.americanbar.org. Retrieved January 7, 2025.

austlii.edu.au

Constitution (Cth) s 51.
Leask v Commonwealth [1996] HCA 29, (1996) 187 CLR 579, High Court (Australia).
Burton v Honan [1952] HCA 30, (1952) 86 CLR 169, High Court (Australia).

cornell.edu

law.cornell.edu

"Rule 26. Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery | Federal Rules of Civil Procedure | LII / Legal Information Institute". Law.cornell.edu. Retrieved June 19, 2013.

digitale-sammlungen.de

L. Hirschberg (1978/79), Der Grundsatz der Verhältnismäßigkeit [The Principle of Proportionality] (Göttingen: Schwartz, 1981), ISBN 3-509-01147-3, at p. 6 – cited in Grimm 2007, p. 385. According to T. Kingreen/R. Poscher, Polizei- und Ordnungsrecht, 12. ed. (Munich: C.H. Beck, 2022), § 1, at margin note 12, further court decisions of importance were PrOVGE (Berlin: Heymanns. OCLC 1366431715) 13 (1887), 426 (at p. 427–428); E 38 (1901), 421 (at p. 421 and pp. 426–427); E 51 (1908), 284 (at p. 288). Grimm, Dieter [in German] (Spring 2007). "Proportionality in Canadian and German Constitutional Jurisprudence". University of Toronto Law Journal. 57 (2). University of Toronto Press: 383–397. doi:10.1353/tlj.2007.0014. ISSN 1710-1174. JSTOR 4491725.

doi.org

L. Hirschberg (1978/79), Der Grundsatz der Verhältnismäßigkeit [The Principle of Proportionality] (Göttingen: Schwartz, 1981), ISBN 3-509-01147-3, at p. 6 – cited in Grimm 2007, p. 385. According to T. Kingreen/R. Poscher, Polizei- und Ordnungsrecht, 12. ed. (Munich: C.H. Beck, 2022), § 1, at margin note 12, further court decisions of importance were PrOVGE (Berlin: Heymanns. OCLC 1366431715) 13 (1887), 426 (at p. 427–428); E 38 (1901), 421 (at p. 421 and pp. 426–427); E 51 (1908), 284 (at p. 288). Grimm, Dieter [in German] (Spring 2007). "Proportionality in Canadian and German Constitutional Jurisprudence". University of Toronto Law Journal. 57 (2). University of Toronto Press: 383–397. doi:10.1353/tlj.2007.0014. ISSN 1710-1174. JSTOR 4491725.
Grimm 2007, p. 385, referring to German Federal Constitutional Court (1954) E 3, 383, at p. 399 – available via Das Fallrecht/University of Berne. Grimm, Dieter [in German] (Spring 2007). "Proportionality in Canadian and German Constitutional Jurisprudence". University of Toronto Law Journal. 57 (2). University of Toronto Press: 383–397. doi:10.1353/tlj.2007.0014. ISSN 1710-1174. JSTOR 4491725.

findlaw.com

caselaw.lp.findlaw.com

"FindLaw | Cases and Codes". Caselaw.lp.findlaw.com. Retrieved June 19, 2013.

guide-humanitarian-law.org

"Doctors without borders | The Practical Guide to Humanitarian Law". guide-humanitarian-law.org. Archived from the original on December 20, 2024. Retrieved January 7, 2025.

hawaii.edu

www2.hawaii.edu

"The Ethics of War and Peace: Just War Theory" (PDF).

icc-cpi.int

Article 52 of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions provides a widely accepted definition of military objective: "In so far as objects are concerned, military objectives are limited to those objects which by their nature, location, purpose or use make an effective contribution to military action and whose total or partial destruction, capture or neutralization, in the circumstances ruling at the time, offers a definite military advantage", (Moreno-Ocampo 2006, p. 5, footnote 11) Moreno-Ocampo, Luis (February 9, 2006), OTP letter to senders re Iraq (PDF), International Criminal Court, archived from the original (PDF) on March 27, 2009
Moreno-Ocampo 2006, pp. 4–5. See section "Allegations concerning War Crimes". Moreno-Ocampo, Luis (February 9, 2006), OTP letter to senders re Iraq (PDF), International Criminal Court, archived from the original (PDF) on March 27, 2009

insidecounsel.com

Kozubek, Michael (March 1, 2011). "Proportionality Doctrine Reduces E-Discovery Costs and Abuses". Insidecounsel.com. Retrieved June 19, 2013.

jhu.edu

muse.jhu.edu

L. Hirschberg (1978/79), Der Grundsatz der Verhältnismäßigkeit [The Principle of Proportionality] (Göttingen: Schwartz, 1981), ISBN 3-509-01147-3, at p. 6 – cited in Grimm 2007, p. 385. According to T. Kingreen/R. Poscher, Polizei- und Ordnungsrecht, 12. ed. (Munich: C.H. Beck, 2022), § 1, at margin note 12, further court decisions of importance were PrOVGE (Berlin: Heymanns. OCLC 1366431715) 13 (1887), 426 (at p. 427–428); E 38 (1901), 421 (at p. 421 and pp. 426–427); E 51 (1908), 284 (at p. 288). Grimm, Dieter [in German] (Spring 2007). "Proportionality in Canadian and German Constitutional Jurisprudence". University of Toronto Law Journal. 57 (2). University of Toronto Press: 383–397. doi:10.1353/tlj.2007.0014. ISSN 1710-1174. JSTOR 4491725.
Grimm 2007, p. 385, referring to German Federal Constitutional Court (1954) E 3, 383, at p. 399 – available via Das Fallrecht/University of Berne. Grimm, Dieter [in German] (Spring 2007). "Proportionality in Canadian and German Constitutional Jurisprudence". University of Toronto Law Journal. 57 (2). University of Toronto Press: 383–397. doi:10.1353/tlj.2007.0014. ISSN 1710-1174. JSTOR 4491725.

jstor.org

L. Hirschberg (1978/79), Der Grundsatz der Verhältnismäßigkeit [The Principle of Proportionality] (Göttingen: Schwartz, 1981), ISBN 3-509-01147-3, at p. 6 – cited in Grimm 2007, p. 385. According to T. Kingreen/R. Poscher, Polizei- und Ordnungsrecht, 12. ed. (Munich: C.H. Beck, 2022), § 1, at margin note 12, further court decisions of importance were PrOVGE (Berlin: Heymanns. OCLC 1366431715) 13 (1887), 426 (at p. 427–428); E 38 (1901), 421 (at p. 421 and pp. 426–427); E 51 (1908), 284 (at p. 288). Grimm, Dieter [in German] (Spring 2007). "Proportionality in Canadian and German Constitutional Jurisprudence". University of Toronto Law Journal. 57 (2). University of Toronto Press: 383–397. doi:10.1353/tlj.2007.0014. ISSN 1710-1174. JSTOR 4491725.
Grimm 2007, p. 385, referring to German Federal Constitutional Court (1954) E 3, 383, at p. 399 – available via Das Fallrecht/University of Berne. Grimm, Dieter [in German] (Spring 2007). "Proportionality in Canadian and German Constitutional Jurisprudence". University of Toronto Law Journal. 57 (2). University of Toronto Press: 383–397. doi:10.1353/tlj.2007.0014. ISSN 1710-1174. JSTOR 4491725.

justice.gov.uk

Ministry of Justice, Part 44: General Rules about Costs, rule 44.4, accessed 14 November 2022

ssrn.com

papers.ssrn.com

Dolzhikov, Alexey V. (December 9, 2011). "The European Court of Human Rights on the Principle of Proportionality in 'Russian' Cases". Rochester, NY. SSRN 2695159. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
Shamash 2005–2006. Shamash, Hamutal Esther (2005–2006), "How Much is Too Much? An Examination of the Principle of Jus in Bello Proportionality", Israel Defense Forces Law Review, 2, SSRN 908369

unibe.ch

servat.unibe.ch

Grimm 2007, p. 385, referring to German Federal Constitutional Court (1954) E 3, 383, at p. 399 – available via Das Fallrecht/University of Berne. Grimm, Dieter [in German] (Spring 2007). "Proportionality in Canadian and German Constitutional Jurisprudence". University of Toronto Law Journal. 57 (2). University of Toronto Press: 383–397. doi:10.1353/tlj.2007.0014. ISSN 1710-1174. JSTOR 4491725.

web.archive.org

Article 52 of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions provides a widely accepted definition of military objective: "In so far as objects are concerned, military objectives are limited to those objects which by their nature, location, purpose or use make an effective contribution to military action and whose total or partial destruction, capture or neutralization, in the circumstances ruling at the time, offers a definite military advantage", (Moreno-Ocampo 2006, p. 5, footnote 11) Moreno-Ocampo, Luis (February 9, 2006), OTP letter to senders re Iraq (PDF), International Criminal Court, archived from the original (PDF) on March 27, 2009
Moreno-Ocampo 2006, pp. 4–5. See section "Allegations concerning War Crimes". Moreno-Ocampo, Luis (February 9, 2006), OTP letter to senders re Iraq (PDF), International Criminal Court, archived from the original (PDF) on March 27, 2009
"Doctors without borders | The Practical Guide to Humanitarian Law". guide-humanitarian-law.org. Archived from the original on December 20, 2024. Retrieved January 7, 2025.

wikipedia.org

de.wikipedia.org

L. Hirschberg (1978/79), Der Grundsatz der Verhältnismäßigkeit [The Principle of Proportionality] (Göttingen: Schwartz, 1981), ISBN 3-509-01147-3, at p. 6 – cited in Grimm 2007, p. 385. According to T. Kingreen/R. Poscher, Polizei- und Ordnungsrecht, 12. ed. (Munich: C.H. Beck, 2022), § 1, at margin note 12, further court decisions of importance were PrOVGE (Berlin: Heymanns. OCLC 1366431715) 13 (1887), 426 (at p. 427–428); E 38 (1901), 421 (at p. 421 and pp. 426–427); E 51 (1908), 284 (at p. 288). Grimm, Dieter [in German] (Spring 2007). "Proportionality in Canadian and German Constitutional Jurisprudence". University of Toronto Law Journal. 57 (2). University of Toronto Press: 383–397. doi:10.1353/tlj.2007.0014. ISSN 1710-1174. JSTOR 4491725.
Grimm 2007, p. 385, referring to German Federal Constitutional Court (1954) E 3, 383, at p. 399 – available via Das Fallrecht/University of Berne. Grimm, Dieter [in German] (Spring 2007). "Proportionality in Canadian and German Constitutional Jurisprudence". University of Toronto Law Journal. 57 (2). University of Toronto Press: 383–397. doi:10.1353/tlj.2007.0014. ISSN 1710-1174. JSTOR 4491725.

worldcat.org

search.worldcat.org

L. Hirschberg (1978/79), Der Grundsatz der Verhältnismäßigkeit [The Principle of Proportionality] (Göttingen: Schwartz, 1981), ISBN 3-509-01147-3, at p. 6 – cited in Grimm 2007, p. 385. According to T. Kingreen/R. Poscher, Polizei- und Ordnungsrecht, 12. ed. (Munich: C.H. Beck, 2022), § 1, at margin note 12, further court decisions of importance were PrOVGE (Berlin: Heymanns. OCLC 1366431715) 13 (1887), 426 (at p. 427–428); E 38 (1901), 421 (at p. 421 and pp. 426–427); E 51 (1908), 284 (at p. 288). Grimm, Dieter [in German] (Spring 2007). "Proportionality in Canadian and German Constitutional Jurisprudence". University of Toronto Law Journal. 57 (2). University of Toronto Press: 383–397. doi:10.1353/tlj.2007.0014. ISSN 1710-1174. JSTOR 4491725.
Grimm 2007, p. 385, referring to German Federal Constitutional Court (1954) E 3, 383, at p. 399 – available via Das Fallrecht/University of Berne. Grimm, Dieter [in German] (Spring 2007). "Proportionality in Canadian and German Constitutional Jurisprudence". University of Toronto Law Journal. 57 (2). University of Toronto Press: 383–397. doi:10.1353/tlj.2007.0014. ISSN 1710-1174. JSTOR 4491725.

worldcat.org

L. Hirschberg (1978/79), Der Grundsatz der Verhältnismäßigkeit [The Principle of Proportionality] (Göttingen: Schwartz, 1981), ISBN 3-509-01147-3, at p. 6 – cited in Grimm 2007, p. 385. According to T. Kingreen/R. Poscher, Polizei- und Ordnungsrecht, 12. ed. (Munich: C.H. Beck, 2022), § 1, at margin note 12, further court decisions of importance were PrOVGE (Berlin: Heymanns. OCLC 1366431715) 13 (1887), 426 (at p. 427–428); E 38 (1901), 421 (at p. 421 and pp. 426–427); E 51 (1908), 284 (at p. 288). Grimm, Dieter [in German] (Spring 2007). "Proportionality in Canadian and German Constitutional Jurisprudence". University of Toronto Law Journal. 57 (2). University of Toronto Press: 383–397. doi:10.1353/tlj.2007.0014. ISSN 1710-1174. JSTOR 4491725.