Protocol I (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Protocol I" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
2,421st place
2,218th place
99th place
77th place
27th place
51st place
305th place
264th place
2nd place
2nd place
763rd place
2,654th place
1,388th place
972nd place
293rd place
203rd place
low place
low place
70th place
63rd place
3,332nd place
1,981st place

bloomberg.com

cambridge.org

doi.org

icrc.org

icrc.org

ihl-databases.icrc.org

  • "Treaties, States parties, and Commentaries - Signatory States - Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), 8 June 1977". ihl-databases.icrc.org. Retrieved 13 April 2022.
  • "Treaties, States parties, and Commentaries - States Parties - Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), 8 June 1977". ihl-databases.icrc.org. Retrieved 13 April 2022.

international-review.icrc.org

loc.gov

pravo.gov.ru

publication.pravo.gov.ru

supportgenevaconventions.org

theglobeandmail.com

themoscowtimes.com

vanderbilt.edu

scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu

  • According to "Exceptional Engagement: Protocol I and a World United Against Terrorism" by Michael A. Newton (2009), Texas International Law Journal vol. 45, p 323: "The United States chose not to adopt the Protocol in the face of intensive international criticism because of its policy conclusions that the text contained overly expansive provisions resulting from politicized pressure to accord protection to terrorists who elected to conduct hostile military operations outside the established legal framework."

wikisource.org

en.wikisource.org

  • Russia revoked their ratification of the point 2 of Article 90 on 16 October 2019 via executive order and submitted such legislation to be adopted by the State Duma.[3]