Pseudoscience (English Wikipedia)

Shapiro A (27 January 2020). "The Dangerous Resurgence in Race Science". American Scientist. Archived from the original on 16 November 2020. Retrieved 1 December 2020.

archive-it.org (Global: 910^th place; English: 593^rd place)

wayback.archive-it.org

National Science Board (2004). "Chapter 7 Science and Technology: Public Attitudes and Understanding: Public Knowledge About S&T". Science and Engineering Indicators 2004. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Archived from the original on 28 June 2015. Retrieved 28 August 2013.
National Science Board (2006). "Chapter 7: Science and Technology Public Attitudes and Understanding: Public Knowledge About S&T". Science and Engineering Indicators 2006. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Figure 7-8 – Belief in paranormal phenomena: 1990, 2001, and 2005.
National Science Board (2006). "Chapter 7: Science and Technology Public Attitudes and Understanding: Public Knowledge About S&T". Science and Engineering Indicators 2006. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Footnote 29. Archived from the original on 28 June 2015.
National Science Board (2006). Science and Engineering Indicators 2006: Volume 1 (PDF). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. pp. 7–3. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 June 2015. Retrieved 13 August 2021.
National Science Board (2006). "Appendix table 7-16: Attitudes toward science and technology, by country/region: Most recent year". Science and Engineering Indicators 2006: Volume 2, Appendix Tables (PDF). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. pp. A7–17. Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 February 2016. Retrieved 6 April 2018.

archive.org (Global: 6^th place; English: 6^th place)

Blum (1978), p. 12 [Yeates' emphasis]; also, see Moll (1902), pp. 44–47^[24] Blum J (1978). Pseudoscience and Mental Ability: The Origins and Fallacies of the IQ Controversy. New York: Monthly Review Press. Moll A (1902). Christian Science, Medicine, and Occultism. London: Rebman.
Bowler J (2003). Evolution: The History of an Idea (3rd ed.). University of California Press. p. 128. ISBN 978-0-520-23693-6.
Shermer (1997). Shermer M (1997). Why people believe weird things: pseudoscience, superstition, and other confusions of our time. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company. ISBN 978-0-7167-3090-3.
Casti JL (1990). Paradigms lost: tackling the unanswered mysteries of modern science (1st ed.). New York: Avon Books. pp. 51–52. ISBN 978-0-380-71165-9.
Hines T (1988). Pseudoscience and the Paranormal: A Critical Examination of the Evidence. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books. ISBN 978-0-87975-419-8.

arxiv.org (Global: 69^th place; English: 59^th place)

Efthimiou & Llewellyn (2006), p. 4 – Efthimiou quoting Friedman: "We could dignify pseudoscience by mentioning it at all". C.J. Efthimiou, R. Llewellyn (2006). "Is pseudoscience the solution to science literacy?". arXiv:physics/0608061.
Efthimiou & Llewellyn (2006), p. 4 – Efthimiou quoting Park: "The more serious threat is to the public, which is not often in a position to judge which claims are real and which are voodoo. ... Those who are fortunate enough to have chosen science as a career have an obligation to inform the public about voodoo science". C.J. Efthimiou, R. Llewellyn (2006). "Is pseudoscience the solution to science literacy?". arXiv:physics/0608061.

astronet.ru (Global: 3,201^st place; English: low place)

vivovoco.astronet.ru

Чем угрожает обществу лженаука? (заседание Президиума РАН) 2003 Archived 26 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine // Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. № 1. 2004. P. 8–27.

books.google.com (Global: 3^rd place; English: 3^rd place)

Kaufman AB, Kaufman JC (12 March 2019). Pseudoscience: The Conspiracy Against Science. MIT Press. p. 471. ISBN 978-0-262-53704-9. Pseudoscience is different from junk science...
Andrews & Henry (1796), p. 87. Andrews JP, Henry R (1796). History of Great Britain, from the death of Henry VIII to the accession of James VI of Scotland to the crown of England. Vol. II. London: T. Cadell and W. Davies. Archived from the original on 16 July 2021. Retrieved 7 November 2020.
Lamont P (2013). Extraordinary Beliefs: A Historical Approach to a Psychological Problem. Cambridge University Press. p. 58. ISBN 978-1-107-01933-1. Archived from the original on 16 July 2021. Retrieved 19 August 2019.
Lamont P (2013). Extraordinary Beliefs: A Historical Approach to a Psychological Problem. Cambridge University Press. p. 58. ISBN 978-1-107-01933-1. Archived from the original on 16 July 2021. Retrieved 19 August 2019. When the eminent French physiologist, François Magendie, first coined the term 'pseudo-science' in 1843, he was referring to phrenology.
Churchland PM (1999). Matter and Consciousness: A Contemporary Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind. MIT Press. p. 90. ISBN 978-0-262-53074-3. Archived from the original on 16 July 2021. Retrieved 7 November 2020.
Eileen Gambrill (1 May 2012). Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice: Improving the Quality of Judgments and Decisions (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. p. 109. ISBN 978-0-470-90438-1. Archived from the original on 22 December 2019. Retrieved 25 October 2015.
Gordin MD (2015). "That a clear line of demarcation has separated science from pseudoscience". In Numbers RL, Kampourakis K (eds.). Newton's Apple and Other Myths about Science. Harvard University Press. pp. 219–25. ISBN 978-0-674-91547-3. Archived from the original on 11 October 2021. Retrieved 11 January 2022.
Laudan L (1983). "The Demise of the Demarcation Problem". In Cohen RS, Laudan L (eds.). Physics, Philosophy and Psychoanalysis: Essays in Honor of Adolf Grünbaum. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 76. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. pp. 111–127. ISBN 978-90-277-1533-3. Archived from the original on 25 September 2020. Retrieved 25 October 2015.

bris.ac.uk (Global: 4,848^th place; English: 3,431^st place)

eis.bris.ac.uk

Bird A (2008). "The Historical Turn in the Philosophy of Science" (PDF). In Psillos S, Curd M (eds.). Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Science. Abingdon: Routledge. pp. 9, 14. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 June 2013.

businessinsider.com (Global: 140^th place; English: 115^th place)

LeVine M (8 December 2016). "What scientists can teach us about fake news and disinformation". Business Insider. Archived from the original on 10 December 2016. Retrieved 15 December 2016.

calacademy.org (Global: 5,154^th place; English: 3,727^th place)

Stone S, Ng A. "American adults flunk basic science: National survey shows only one-in-five adults can answer three science questions correctly" (Press release). California Academy of Sciences. Archived from the original on 18 October 2013.

deccanherald.com (Global: 516^th place; English: 291^st place)

Rathee P (20 November 2018). "What is AYUSH and the controversy around it?". Deccan Herald. The Printers (Mysore). Archived from the original on 22 November 2020. Retrieved 4 April 2021.

doi.org (Global: 2^nd place; English: 2^nd place)

Parker Jones, O., Alfaro-Almagro, F., & Jbabdi, S. (2018). An empirical, 21st century evaluation of phrenology. Cortex. Volume 106. pp. 26–35. doi: doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2018.04.011
Rodríguez-Ferreiro J, Barberia I (21 December 2021). "Believers in pseudoscience present lower evidential criteria". Scientific Reports. 11 (1): 24352. Bibcode:2021NatSR..1124352R. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-03816-5. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 8692588. PMID 34934119.
Hurd PD (1998). "Scientific literacy: New minds for a changing world". Science Education. 82 (3): 407–16. Bibcode:1998SciEd..82..407H. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199806)82:3<407::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-G.(subscription required)
Gropp RE (1 August 2003). "Evolution Activists Organize to Combat Pseudoscience in Public Schools". BioScience. 53 (8): 700. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0700:EAOTCP]2.0.CO;2. ISSN 0006-3568. S2CID 84435133.
Still A, Dryden W (2004). "The Social Psychology of "Pseudoscience": A Brief History". J Theory Soc Behav. 34 (3): 265–290. doi:10.1111/j.0021-8308.2004.00248.x.
Thagard (1978), pp. 223 ff. Thagard PR (1978). "Why astrology is a pseudoscience". PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. 1978 (1): 223–234. doi:10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1978.1.192639. ISSN 0270-8647. S2CID 147050929. Archived from the original on 28 March 2019. Retrieved 5 November 2018.
Greener M (2007). "Taking on creationism. Which arguments and evidence counter pseudoscience?". EMBO Reports. 8 (12): 1107–09. doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7401131. PMC 2267227. PMID 18059309.
Thagard (1978), pp. 227–228. Thagard PR (1978). "Why astrology is a pseudoscience". PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. 1978 (1): 223–234. doi:10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1978.1.192639. ISSN 0270-8647. S2CID 147050929. Archived from the original on 28 March 2019. Retrieved 5 November 2018.
Devilly (2005). Devilly GJ (2005). "Power therapies and possible threats to the science of psychology and psychiatry". The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 39 (6): 437–445. doi:10.1080/j.1440-1614.2005.01601.x. PMID 15943644. S2CID 208627667.
Nelson R (2019). "Racism in Science: The Taint That Lingers". Nature. 570 (7762): 440–441. Bibcode:2019Natur.570..440N. doi:10.1038/d41586-019-01968-z. S2CID 195354000.
Eve RA, Dunn D (1990). "Psychic powers, astrology & creationism in the classroom? Evidence of pseudoscientific beliefs among high school biology & life science teachers" (PDF). The American Biology Teacher. Vol. 52, no. 1. pp. 10–21. doi:10.2307/4449018. JSTOR 4449018. Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 October 2017.
Devilly (2005), p. 439. Devilly GJ (2005). "Power therapies and possible threats to the science of psychology and psychiatry". The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 39 (6): 437–445. doi:10.1080/j.1440-1614.2005.01601.x. PMID 15943644. S2CID 208627667.
Beyerstein B, Hadaway P (1991). "On avoiding folly". Journal of Drug Issues. 20 (4): 689–700. doi:10.1177/002204269002000418. S2CID 148414205.
Shermer M (2011). "Understanding the believing brain: Why science is the only way out of belief-dependent realism". Scientific American. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0711-85. Archived from the original on 30 August 2016. Retrieved 14 August 2016.
Lindeman M (1998). "Motivation, cognition and pseudoscience". Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 39 (4): 257–265. doi:10.1111/1467-9450.00085. PMID 9883101.
Matute H, Blanco F, Yarritu I, Díaz-Lago M, Vadillo MA, Barberia I (2015). "Illusions of causality: how they bias our everyday thinking and how they could be reduced". Frontiers in Psychology. 6: 888. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00888. PMC 4488611. PMID 26191014.
Evans JS (2003). "In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning". Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 7 (10): 454–459. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.012. PMID 14550493. S2CID 12508462. Archived from the original on 21 November 2018. Retrieved 15 October 2020.
Matute H, Yarritu I, Vadillo MA (2011). "Illusions of causality at the heart of pseudoscience". British Journal of Psychology. 102 (3): 392–405. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.298.3070. doi:10.1348/000712610X532210. PMID 21751996.
Thagard (1978). Thagard PR (1978). "Why astrology is a pseudoscience". PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. 1978 (1): 223–234. doi:10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1978.1.192639. ISSN 0270-8647. S2CID 147050929. Archived from the original on 28 March 2019. Retrieved 5 November 2018.
Newbold D, Roberts J (2007). "An analysis of the demarcation problem in science and its application to therapeutic touch theory". International Journal of Nursing Practice. 13 (6): 324–30. doi:10.1111/j.1440-172X.2007.00646.x. PMID 18021160.
Makgoba MW (2002). "Politics, the media and science in HIV/AIDS: the peril of pseudoscience". Vaccine. 20 (15): 1899–1904. doi:10.1016/S0264-410X(02)00063-4. PMID 11983241.

edcipr.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

Impey C, Buxner S, Antonellis J, Johnson E, King C (2011). "A twenty-year survey of science literacy among college undergraduates" (PDF). Journal of College Science Teaching. 40 (1): 31–37. Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 October 2017. Retrieved 13 October 2017.

etymonline.com (Global: 287^th place; English: 321^st place)

"Online Etymology Dictionary". Douglas Harper. 2015. Archived from the original on 10 May 2019. Retrieved 12 April 2018.

exlibrisgroup.com (Global: 9,042^nd place; English: 5,814^th place)

unsw-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com

Yeates (2018), p. 42. Yeates L (Autumn 2018). "James Braid (II): Mesmerism, Braid's Crucial Experiment, and Braid's Discovery of Neuro-Hypnotism". Australian Journal of Clinical Hypnotherapy & Hypnosis. 40 (1): 40–92.

firstpost.com (Global: 283^rd place; English: 179^th place)

Narayanan K (1 July 2020). "AYUSH Ministry is endangering people, jeopardising Ayurveda with lax response to Patanjali's Coronil and COVID-19, warn experts". Firstpost. Archived from the original on 21 November 2020.

foxnews.com (Global: 152^nd place; English: 120^th place)

FOX News (18 June 2004). "Poll: More Believe In God Than Heaven". Fox News Channel. Archived from the original on 5 March 2009. Retrieved 26 April 2009. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)

gallup.com (Global: 2,558^th place; English: 1,868^th place)

David W. Moore (16 June 2005). "Three in Four Americans Believe in Paranormal". Archived from the original on 22 August 2010.

harrisinteractive.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

Taylor H (26 February 2003). "Harris Poll: The Religious and Other Beliefs of Americans 2003". Archived from the original on 11 January 2007. Retrieved 26 April 2009.

harvard.edu (Global: 18^th place; English: 17^th place)

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

Rodríguez-Ferreiro J, Barberia I (21 December 2021). "Believers in pseudoscience present lower evidential criteria". Scientific Reports. 11 (1): 24352. Bibcode:2021NatSR..1124352R. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-03816-5. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 8692588. PMID 34934119.
Hurd PD (1998). "Scientific literacy: New minds for a changing world". Science Education. 82 (3): 407–16. Bibcode:1998SciEd..82..407H. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199806)82:3<407::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-G.(subscription required)
Nelson R (2019). "Racism in Science: The Taint That Lingers". Nature. 570 (7762): 440–441. Bibcode:2019Natur.570..440N. doi:10.1038/d41586-019-01968-z. S2CID 195354000.

ieg-ego.eu (Global: low place; English: low place)

Frietsch U (7 April 2015). "The boundaries of science/ pseudoscience". European History Online. Archived from the original on 15 April 2017. Retrieved 15 April 2017.

indiana.edu (Global: 2,113^th place; English: 1,465^th place)

Amsden, Brian. "Recognizing Microstructural Fallacies" (PDF). p. 22. Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 July 2019. Retrieved 24 March 2014.

innertraditions.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

"Frank Joseph". Inner Traditions. Archived from the original on 16 July 2021. Retrieved 1 December 2020.

jasoncolavito.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

Colavito J. "Review of "Power Places And The Master Builders of Antiquity" By Frank Joseph". Jason Colavito. Archived from the original on 25 November 2020. Retrieved 4 December 2020.

jstor.org (Global: 26^th place; English: 20^th place)

Singer B, Benassi VA (1981). "Occult beliefs: Media distortions, social uncertainty, and deficiencies of human reasoning seem to be at the basis of occult beliefs". American Scientist. Vol. 69, no. 1. pp. 49–55. JSTOR 27850247.
Eve RA, Dunn D (1990). "Psychic powers, astrology & creationism in the classroom? Evidence of pseudoscientific beliefs among high school biology & life science teachers" (PDF). The American Biology Teacher. Vol. 52, no. 1. pp. 10–21. doi:10.2307/4449018. JSTOR 4449018. Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 October 2017.

klnran.ru (Global: low place; English: low place)

Alexandrov YB (2014). Феномен лженауки в современном обществе и меры по противодействию лженаучным проявлениям [The Phenomenon of Pseudoscience in Modern Society and Measures to Counter Pseudoscientific Manifestations] (PDF). Commission of the Russian Academy of Sciences for Combating Pseudoscience and Falsification of Scientific Research, In Defence of Science. ISBN 978-5-02-039044-7. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 May 2017.

kommersant.ru (Global: 176^th place; English: 1,455^th place)

Лженаука и жизнь Archived 6 February 2010 at the Wayback Machine // Kommersant № 174 (3258), 16.09.2005

lander.edu (Global: low place; English: low place)

philosophy.lander.edu

"Ad Hominem and Related Fallacies". philosophy.lander.edu. Archived from the original on 4 December 2020. Retrieved 30 August 2022.

lhup.edu (Global: low place; English: low place)

Donald E. Simanek. "What is science? What is pseudoscience?". Archived from the original on 25 April 2009.

loc.gov (Global: 70^th place; English: 63^rd place)

lccn.loc.gov

Gauch (2003), pp. 3–5 ff. Gauch HG (2003). Scientific Method in Practice. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-01708-4. LCCN 2002022271.
Gauch (2003), pp. 191 ff, especially Chapter 6, "Probability", and Chapter 7, "inductive Logic and Statistics" Gauch HG (2003). Scientific Method in Practice. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-01708-4. LCCN 2002022271.
Gauch (2003), pp. 211 ff, (Probability, "Common Blunders"). Gauch HG (2003). Scientific Method in Practice. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-01708-4. LCCN 2002022271.
Gauch (2003), pp. 269 ff, "Parsimony and Efficiency". Gauch HG (2003). Scientific Method in Practice. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-01708-4. LCCN 2002022271.
Gauch (2003), pp. 178 ff, (Deductive Logic, "Fallacies"). Gauch HG (2003). Scientific Method in Practice. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-01708-4. LCCN 2002022271.
Gauch (2003), pp. 124 ff. Gauch HG (2003). Scientific Method in Practice. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-01708-4. LCCN 2002022271.
Gauch (2003), pp. 3–7. Gauch HG (2003). Scientific Method in Practice. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-01708-4. LCCN 2002022271.

lse.ac.uk (Global: 2,117^th place; English: 1,361^st place)

www2.lse.ac.uk

Lakatos I (1973). "Science and Pseudoscience". The London School of Economics and Political Science, Dept of Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method. Archived from the original (mp3) on 25 July 2011. "Science and Pseudoscience (transcript)". Archived from the original on 28 July 2011.

msu.edu (Global: 1,844^th place; English: 1,231^st place)

msutoday.msu.edu

Oswald T (15 November 2007). "MSU prof: Lack of science knowledge hurting democratic process". MSUToday. Michigan State University. Archived from the original on 11 September 2013. Retrieved 28 August 2013.

ncahf.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

The National Council Against Health Fraud (1994). "NCAHF Position Paper on Homeopathy". Archived from the original on 25 December 2018. Retrieved 19 January 2011.

ncse.com (Global: low place; English: 9,698^th place)

Sager (2008), p. 10. Sager C, ed. (2008). "Voices for evolution" (PDF). National Center for Science Education. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 December 2010. Retrieved 21 May 2010.

newsweek.com (Global: 269^th place; English: 201^st place)

Gilman S (3 January 2018). "The Alt-Right's Jew-Hating Pseudoscience Is Not New". Newsweek. Archived from the original on 9 November 2020. Retrieved 28 November 2020.

nih.gov (Global: 4^th place; English: 4^th place)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Rodríguez-Ferreiro J, Barberia I (21 December 2021). "Believers in pseudoscience present lower evidential criteria". Scientific Reports. 11 (1): 24352. Bibcode:2021NatSR..1124352R. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-03816-5. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 8692588. PMID 34934119.
Greener M (2007). "Taking on creationism. Which arguments and evidence counter pseudoscience?". EMBO Reports. 8 (12): 1107–09. doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7401131. PMC 2267227. PMID 18059309.
Gitanjali B (2001). "Peer review – process, perspectives and the path ahead" (PDF). Journal of Postgraduate Medicine. 47 (3): 210–14. PMID 11832629. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 June 2006.
Devilly (2005). Devilly GJ (2005). "Power therapies and possible threats to the science of psychology and psychiatry". The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 39 (6): 437–445. doi:10.1080/j.1440-1614.2005.01601.x. PMID 15943644. S2CID 208627667.
Devilly (2005), p. 439. Devilly GJ (2005). "Power therapies and possible threats to the science of psychology and psychiatry". The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 39 (6): 437–445. doi:10.1080/j.1440-1614.2005.01601.x. PMID 15943644. S2CID 208627667.
Lindeman M (1998). "Motivation, cognition and pseudoscience". Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 39 (4): 257–265. doi:10.1111/1467-9450.00085. PMID 9883101.
Matute H, Blanco F, Yarritu I, Díaz-Lago M, Vadillo MA, Barberia I (2015). "Illusions of causality: how they bias our everyday thinking and how they could be reduced". Frontiers in Psychology. 6: 888. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00888. PMC 4488611. PMID 26191014.
Evans JS (2003). "In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning". Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 7 (10): 454–459. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.012. PMID 14550493. S2CID 12508462. Archived from the original on 21 November 2018. Retrieved 15 October 2020.
Matute H, Yarritu I, Vadillo MA (2011). "Illusions of causality at the heart of pseudoscience". British Journal of Psychology. 102 (3): 392–405. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.298.3070. doi:10.1348/000712610X532210. PMID 21751996.
Newbold D, Roberts J (2007). "An analysis of the demarcation problem in science and its application to therapeutic touch theory". International Journal of Nursing Practice. 13 (6): 324–30. doi:10.1111/j.1440-172X.2007.00646.x. PMID 18021160.
Makgoba MW (2002). "Politics, the media and science in HIV/AIDS: the peril of pseudoscience". Vaccine. 20 (15): 1899–1904. doi:10.1016/S0264-410X(02)00063-4. PMID 11983241.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Rodríguez-Ferreiro J, Barberia I (21 December 2021). "Believers in pseudoscience present lower evidential criteria". Scientific Reports. 11 (1): 24352. Bibcode:2021NatSR..1124352R. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-03816-5. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 8692588. PMID 34934119.
Greener M (2007). "Taking on creationism. Which arguments and evidence counter pseudoscience?". EMBO Reports. 8 (12): 1107–09. doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7401131. PMC 2267227. PMID 18059309.
Matute H, Blanco F, Yarritu I, Díaz-Lago M, Vadillo MA, Barberia I (2015). "Illusions of causality: how they bias our everyday thinking and how they could be reduced". Frontiers in Psychology. 6: 888. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00888. PMC 4488611. PMID 26191014.

nsf.gov (Global: 3,828^th place; English: 2,823^rd place)

National Science Board (2004). "Chapter 7 Science and Technology: Public Attitudes and Understanding: Public Knowledge About S&T". Science and Engineering Indicators 2004. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Archived from the original on 28 June 2015. Retrieved 28 August 2013.
National Science Board (2006). "Chapter 7: Science and Technology Public Attitudes and Understanding: Public Knowledge About S&T". Science and Engineering Indicators 2006. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Footnote 29. Archived from the original on 28 June 2015.
National Science Board (2006). Science and Engineering Indicators 2006: Volume 1 (PDF). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. pp. 7–3. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 June 2015. Retrieved 13 August 2021.
National Science Board (2006). "Appendix table 7-16: Attitudes toward science and technology, by country/region: Most recent year". Science and Engineering Indicators 2006: Volume 2, Appendix Tables (PDF). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. pp. A7–17. Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 February 2016. Retrieved 6 April 2018.

nytimes.com (Global: 7^th place; English: 7^th place)

Stephens B (28 December 2019). "The Secrets of Jewish Genius". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 23 April 2021. Retrieved 21 April 2021.

oed.com (Global: 360^th place; English: 231^st place)

"pseudoscience". Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.)

paul-rosenfels.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

Popper K (1963). Conjectures and Refutations (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 October 2017.

philpapers.org (Global: 1,865^th place; English: 1,260^th place)

Thagard (1978), pp. 223 ff. Thagard PR (1978). "Why astrology is a pseudoscience". PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. 1978 (1): 223–234. doi:10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1978.1.192639. ISSN 0270-8647. S2CID 147050929. Archived from the original on 28 March 2019. Retrieved 5 November 2018.
Thagard (1978), pp. 227–228. Thagard PR (1978). "Why astrology is a pseudoscience". PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. 1978 (1): 223–234. doi:10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1978.1.192639. ISSN 0270-8647. S2CID 147050929. Archived from the original on 28 March 2019. Retrieved 5 November 2018.
Thagard (1978). Thagard PR (1978). "Why astrology is a pseudoscience". PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. 1978 (1): 223–234. doi:10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1978.1.192639. ISSN 0270-8647. S2CID 147050929. Archived from the original on 28 March 2019. Retrieved 5 November 2018.

politcom.ru (Global: low place; English: low place)

Грызлова выводят на «чистую воду» Archived 6 June 2014 at the Wayback Machine // politcom.ru, 15.03.2010

popularscience.co.uk (Global: low place; English: low place)

Pendle G. "Popular Science Feature – When Science Fiction is Science Fact". Archived from the original on 14 February 2006.

psu.edu (Global: 207^th place; English: 136^th place)

citeseerx.ist.psu.edu

Matute H, Yarritu I, Vadillo MA (2011). "Illusions of causality at the heart of pseudoscience". British Journal of Psychology. 102 (3): 392–405. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.298.3070. doi:10.1348/000712610X532210. PMID 21751996.

royalsoc.ac.uk (Global: low place; English: low place)

"Royal Society statement on evolution, creationism and intelligent design" (Press release). London: Royal Society. 11 April 2006. Archived from the original on 13 October 2007.

salon.com (Global: 456^th place; English: 300^th place)

"How anti-vax pseudoscience seeps into public discourse". Salon. 13 January 2019. Archived from the original on 15 December 2020. Retrieved 16 December 2020.

sciencedaily.com (Global: 993^rd place; English: 920^th place)

"Anti-vaccination websites use 'science' and stories to support claims, study finds". Johns Hopkins. Science Daily. Archived from the original on 16 July 2021. Retrieved 16 December 2020.

sciencedirect.com (Global: 149^th place; English: 178^th place)

Evans JS (2003). "In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning". Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 7 (10): 454–459. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.012. PMID 14550493. S2CID 12508462. Archived from the original on 21 November 2018. Retrieved 15 October 2020.

sciencenews.org (Global: 3,410^th place; English: 2,939^th place)

Raloff J (21 February 2010). "Science literacy: U.S. college courses really count". Science News. Society for Science & the Public. Archived from the original on 13 October 2017. Retrieved 13 October 2017.

scientificamerican.com (Global: 896^th place; English: 674^th place)

Shermer M (2011). "Understanding the believing brain: Why science is the only way out of belief-dependent realism". Scientific American. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0711-85. Archived from the original on 30 August 2016. Retrieved 14 August 2016.

semanticscholar.org (Global: 11^th place; English: 8^th place)

api.semanticscholar.org

Gropp RE (1 August 2003). "Evolution Activists Organize to Combat Pseudoscience in Public Schools". BioScience. 53 (8): 700. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0700:EAOTCP]2.0.CO;2. ISSN 0006-3568. S2CID 84435133.
Thagard (1978), pp. 223 ff. Thagard PR (1978). "Why astrology is a pseudoscience". PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. 1978 (1): 223–234. doi:10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1978.1.192639. ISSN 0270-8647. S2CID 147050929. Archived from the original on 28 March 2019. Retrieved 5 November 2018.
Thagard (1978), pp. 227–228. Thagard PR (1978). "Why astrology is a pseudoscience". PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. 1978 (1): 223–234. doi:10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1978.1.192639. ISSN 0270-8647. S2CID 147050929. Archived from the original on 28 March 2019. Retrieved 5 November 2018.
Devilly (2005). Devilly GJ (2005). "Power therapies and possible threats to the science of psychology and psychiatry". The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 39 (6): 437–445. doi:10.1080/j.1440-1614.2005.01601.x. PMID 15943644. S2CID 208627667.
Nelson R (2019). "Racism in Science: The Taint That Lingers". Nature. 570 (7762): 440–441. Bibcode:2019Natur.570..440N. doi:10.1038/d41586-019-01968-z. S2CID 195354000.
Devilly (2005), p. 439. Devilly GJ (2005). "Power therapies and possible threats to the science of psychology and psychiatry". The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 39 (6): 437–445. doi:10.1080/j.1440-1614.2005.01601.x. PMID 15943644. S2CID 208627667.
Beyerstein B, Hadaway P (1991). "On avoiding folly". Journal of Drug Issues. 20 (4): 689–700. doi:10.1177/002204269002000418. S2CID 148414205.
Evans JS (2003). "In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning". Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 7 (10): 454–459. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.012. PMID 14550493. S2CID 12508462. Archived from the original on 21 November 2018. Retrieved 15 October 2020.
Thagard (1978). Thagard PR (1978). "Why astrology is a pseudoscience". PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. 1978 (1): 223–234. doi:10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1978.1.192639. ISSN 0270-8647. S2CID 147050929. Archived from the original on 28 March 2019. Retrieved 5 November 2018.

senseaboutscience.org.uk (Global: low place; English: low place)

Gitanjali B (2001). "Peer review – process, perspectives and the path ahead" (PDF). Journal of Postgraduate Medicine. 47 (3): 210–14. PMID 11832629. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 June 2006.

skepdic.com (Global: 4,757^th place; English: 4,726^th place)

"Pseudoscience". The Skeptic's Dictionary. Archived from the original on 1 February 2009.

skepticalinquirer.org (Global: 5,915^th place; English: 3,332^nd place)

Vyse S (10 July 2019). "What Should Become of a Monument to Pseudoscience?". Skeptical Inquirer. Center for Inquiry. Archived from the original on 9 December 2019. Retrieved 1 December 2019.

skepticink.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

Lack C (10 October 2013). "What does Scientific Literacy look like in the 21st Century?". Great Plains Skeptic. Skeptic Ink Network. Archived from the original on 13 April 2014. Retrieved 9 April 2014.

smithsonianmag.com (Global: 503^rd place; English: 364^th place)

Abbott (2012). Abbott K (30 October 2012). "The Fox Sisters and the Rap on Spiritualism". Smithsonian.com. Archived from the original on 19 July 2020. Retrieved 19 July 2020.

springer.com (Global: 274^th place; English: 309^th place)

Bunge (1983b). Bunge M (1983b). Epistemology & Methodology II: Understanding the World. Treatise on Basic Philosophy: Volume 6. Springer Netherlands. pp. 223–228. ISBN 978-90-277-1634-7. Archived from the original on 13 June 2020. Retrieved 13 June 2020.

srmhp.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

McNally RJ (2003). "Is the pseudoscience concept useful for clinical psychology?". The Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice. 2 (2). Archived from the original on 30 April 2010.

stanford.edu (Global: 179^th place; English: 183^rd place)

plato.stanford.edu

Hansson SO (2008), "Science and Pseudoscience", Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Section 2: The "science" of pseudoscience, ISSN 1095-5054, archived from the original on 6 September 2008, retrieved 8 April 2009
Hansson SO (3 September 2008). "Science and Pseudo-Science, Section 1: The purpose of demarcations". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University. Archived from the original on 5 September 2015. Retrieved 16 April 2011. From a practical point of view, the distinction is important for decision guidance in both private and public life. Since science is our most reliable source of knowledge in a wide variety of areas, we need to distinguish scientific knowledge from its look-alikes. Due to the high status of science in present-day society, attempts to exaggerate the scientific status of various claims, teachings, and products are common enough to make the demarcation issue pressing in many areas.
Hansson SO (2017). Zalta EN (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. ISSN 1095-5054. Archived from the original on 10 May 2019. Retrieved 16 April 2018.

stephenjaygould.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

Gould SJ (1997). "Nonoverlapping magisteria". Natural History. No. 106. pp. 16–22. Archived from the original on 4 January 2017.

thefreedictionary.com (Global: 614^th place; English: 572^nd place)

"pseudo", The Free Dictionary, Farlex, Inc., 2015, archived from the original on 18 November 2015, retrieved 17 November 2015

theguardian.com (Global: 12^th place; English: 11^th place)

Mahdawi A (29 October 2018). "Is alkaline water a miracle cure – or BS? The science is in". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 1 December 2023.

thehindu.com (Global: 52^nd place; English: 35^th place)

Sources that criticize the entirety of AYUSH as a pseudo-scientific venture:
- Shrinivasan R (26 April 2015). "Questions over science swirl, but AYUSH stands firm". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Archived from the original on 27 August 2021. Retrieved 22 January 2019.

uark.edu (Global: low place; English: 6,604^th place)

physics.uark.edu

Hobson A (2011). "Teaching relevant science for scientific literacy" (PDF). Journal of College Science Teaching. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 August 2011.

uncg.edu (Global: low place; English: 6,852^nd place)

libres.uncg.edu

Eve RA, Dunn D (1990). "Psychic powers, astrology & creationism in the classroom? Evidence of pseudoscientific beliefs among high school biology & life science teachers" (PDF). The American Biology Teacher. Vol. 52, no. 1. pp. 10–21. doi:10.2307/4449018. JSTOR 4449018. Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 October 2017.

uow.edu.au (Global: 6,834^th place; English: 4,564^th place)

For an opposing perspective, e.g. Chapter 5 of Suppression Stories by Brian Martin (Wollongong: Fund for Intellectual Dissent, 1997), pp. 69–83.

utexas.edu (Global: 916^th place; English: 706^th place)

web2.ph.utexas.edu

Rory Coker. "Science versus Pseudoscience". web2.ph.utexas.edu. Archived from the original on 1 March 2022. Retrieved 1 March 2022.
Rory Coker. "SF in pseudoscience". web2.ph.utexas.edu. Archived from the original on 27 June 2022. Retrieved 1 March 2022.

web.archive.org (Global: 1^st place; English: 1^st place)

Hansson SO (2008), "Science and Pseudoscience", Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Section 2: The "science" of pseudoscience, ISSN 1095-5054, archived from the original on 6 September 2008, retrieved 8 April 2009
Lakatos I (1973). "Science and Pseudoscience". The London School of Economics and Political Science, Dept of Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method. Archived from the original (mp3) on 25 July 2011. "Science and Pseudoscience (transcript)". Archived from the original on 28 July 2011.
Hansson SO (3 September 2008). "Science and Pseudo-Science, Section 1: The purpose of demarcations". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University. Archived from the original on 5 September 2015. Retrieved 16 April 2011. From a practical point of view, the distinction is important for decision guidance in both private and public life. Since science is our most reliable source of knowledge in a wide variety of areas, we need to distinguish scientific knowledge from its look-alikes. Due to the high status of science in present-day society, attempts to exaggerate the scientific status of various claims, teachings, and products are common enough to make the demarcation issue pressing in many areas.
Vyse S (10 July 2019). "What Should Become of a Monument to Pseudoscience?". Skeptical Inquirer. Center for Inquiry. Archived from the original on 9 December 2019. Retrieved 1 December 2019.
"How anti-vax pseudoscience seeps into public discourse". Salon. 13 January 2019. Archived from the original on 15 December 2020. Retrieved 16 December 2020.
"Anti-vaccination websites use 'science' and stories to support claims, study finds". Johns Hopkins. Science Daily. Archived from the original on 16 July 2021. Retrieved 16 December 2020.
Frietsch U (7 April 2015). "The boundaries of science/ pseudoscience". European History Online. Archived from the original on 15 April 2017. Retrieved 15 April 2017.
"pseudo", The Free Dictionary, Farlex, Inc., 2015, archived from the original on 18 November 2015, retrieved 17 November 2015
"Online Etymology Dictionary". Douglas Harper. 2015. Archived from the original on 10 May 2019. Retrieved 12 April 2018.
Andrews & Henry (1796), p. 87. Andrews JP, Henry R (1796). History of Great Britain, from the death of Henry VIII to the accession of James VI of Scotland to the crown of England. Vol. II. London: T. Cadell and W. Davies. Archived from the original on 16 July 2021. Retrieved 7 November 2020.
Lamont P (2013). Extraordinary Beliefs: A Historical Approach to a Psychological Problem. Cambridge University Press. p. 58. ISBN 978-1-107-01933-1. Archived from the original on 16 July 2021. Retrieved 19 August 2019.
Lamont P (2013). Extraordinary Beliefs: A Historical Approach to a Psychological Problem. Cambridge University Press. p. 58. ISBN 978-1-107-01933-1. Archived from the original on 16 July 2021. Retrieved 19 August 2019. When the eminent French physiologist, François Magendie, first coined the term 'pseudo-science' in 1843, he was referring to phrenology.
Abbott (2012). Abbott K (30 October 2012). "The Fox Sisters and the Rap on Spiritualism". Smithsonian.com. Archived from the original on 19 July 2020. Retrieved 19 July 2020.
Thagard (1978), pp. 223 ff. Thagard PR (1978). "Why astrology is a pseudoscience". PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. 1978 (1): 223–234. doi:10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1978.1.192639. ISSN 0270-8647. S2CID 147050929. Archived from the original on 28 March 2019. Retrieved 5 November 2018.
McNally RJ (2003). "Is the pseudoscience concept useful for clinical psychology?". The Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice. 2 (2). Archived from the original on 30 April 2010.
"Pseudoscience". The Skeptic's Dictionary. Archived from the original on 1 February 2009.
Bunge (1983b). Bunge M (1983b). Epistemology & Methodology II: Understanding the World. Treatise on Basic Philosophy: Volume 6. Springer Netherlands. pp. 223–228. ISBN 978-90-277-1634-7. Archived from the original on 13 June 2020. Retrieved 13 June 2020.
Popper K (1963). Conjectures and Refutations (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 October 2017.
Churchland PM (1999). Matter and Consciousness: A Contemporary Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind. MIT Press. p. 90. ISBN 978-0-262-53074-3. Archived from the original on 16 July 2021. Retrieved 7 November 2020.
Donald E. Simanek. "What is science? What is pseudoscience?". Archived from the original on 25 April 2009.
Rory Coker. "Science versus Pseudoscience". web2.ph.utexas.edu. Archived from the original on 1 March 2022. Retrieved 1 March 2022.
Rory Coker. "SF in pseudoscience". web2.ph.utexas.edu. Archived from the original on 27 June 2022. Retrieved 1 March 2022.
Thagard (1978), pp. 227–228. Thagard PR (1978). "Why astrology is a pseudoscience". PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. 1978 (1): 223–234. doi:10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1978.1.192639. ISSN 0270-8647. S2CID 147050929. Archived from the original on 28 March 2019. Retrieved 5 November 2018.
Eileen Gambrill (1 May 2012). Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice: Improving the Quality of Judgments and Decisions (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. p. 109. ISBN 978-0-470-90438-1. Archived from the original on 22 December 2019. Retrieved 25 October 2015.
Gitanjali B (2001). "Peer review – process, perspectives and the path ahead" (PDF). Journal of Postgraduate Medicine. 47 (3): 210–14. PMID 11832629. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 June 2006.
Amsden, Brian. "Recognizing Microstructural Fallacies" (PDF). p. 22. Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 July 2019. Retrieved 24 March 2014.
"Ad Hominem and Related Fallacies". philosophy.lander.edu. Archived from the original on 4 December 2020. Retrieved 30 August 2022.
Rathee P (20 November 2018). "What is AYUSH and the controversy around it?". Deccan Herald. The Printers (Mysore). Archived from the original on 22 November 2020. Retrieved 4 April 2021.
Narayanan K (1 July 2020). "AYUSH Ministry is endangering people, jeopardising Ayurveda with lax response to Patanjali's Coronil and COVID-19, warn experts". Firstpost. Archived from the original on 21 November 2020.
Sources that criticize the entirety of AYUSH as a pseudo-scientific venture:
- Shrinivasan R (26 April 2015). "Questions over science swirl, but AYUSH stands firm". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Archived from the original on 27 August 2021. Retrieved 22 January 2019.
- Stone S, Ng A. "American adults flunk basic science: National survey shows only one-in-five adults can answer three science questions correctly" (Press release). California Academy of Sciences. Archived from the original on 18 October 2013.
- Raloff J (21 February 2010). "Science literacy: U.S. college courses really count". Science News. Society for Science & the Public. Archived from the original on 13 October 2017. Retrieved 13 October 2017.
- Oswald T (15 November 2007). "MSU prof: Lack of science knowledge hurting democratic process". MSUToday. Michigan State University. Archived from the original on 11 September 2013. Retrieved 28 August 2013.
- Hobson A (2011). "Teaching relevant science for scientific literacy" (PDF). Journal of College Science Teaching. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 August 2011.
- Impey C, Buxner S, Antonellis J, Johnson E, King C (2011). "A twenty-year survey of science literacy among college undergraduates" (PDF). Journal of College Science Teaching. 40 (1): 31–37. Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 October 2017. Retrieved 13 October 2017.
- David W. Moore (16 June 2005). "Three in Four Americans Believe in Paranormal". Archived from the original on 22 August 2010.
- FOX News (18 June 2004). "Poll: More Believe In God Than Heaven". Fox News Channel. Archived from the original on 5 March 2009. Retrieved 26 April 2009. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
- Taylor H (26 February 2003). "Harris Poll: The Religious and Other Beliefs of Americans 2003". Archived from the original on 11 January 2007. Retrieved 26 April 2009.
- Чем угрожает обществу лженаука? (заседание Президиума РАН) 2003 Archived 26 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine // Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. № 1. 2004. P. 8–27.
- Лженаука и жизнь Archived 6 February 2010 at the Wayback Machine // Kommersant № 174 (3258), 16.09.2005
- Alexandrov YB (2014). Феномен лженауки в современном обществе и меры по противодействию лженаучным проявлениям [The Phenomenon of Pseudoscience in Modern Society and Measures to Counter Pseudoscientific Manifestations] (PDF). Commission of the Russian Academy of Sciences for Combating Pseudoscience and Falsification of Scientific Research, In Defence of Science. ISBN 978-5-02-039044-7. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 May 2017.
- Грызлова выводят на «чистую воду» Archived 6 June 2014 at the Wayback Machine // politcom.ru, 15.03.2010
- "Frank Joseph". Inner Traditions. Archived from the original on 16 July 2021. Retrieved 1 December 2020.
- Colavito J. "Review of "Power Places And The Master Builders of Antiquity" By Frank Joseph". Jason Colavito. Archived from the original on 25 November 2020. Retrieved 4 December 2020.
- Gilman S (3 January 2018). "The Alt-Right's Jew-Hating Pseudoscience Is Not New". Newsweek. Archived from the original on 9 November 2020. Retrieved 28 November 2020.
- Stephens B (28 December 2019). "The Secrets of Jewish Genius". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 23 April 2021. Retrieved 21 April 2021.
- Shapiro A (27 January 2020). "The Dangerous Resurgence in Race Science". American Scientist. Archived from the original on 16 November 2020. Retrieved 1 December 2020.
- Eve RA, Dunn D (1990). "Psychic powers, astrology & creationism in the classroom? Evidence of pseudoscientific beliefs among high school biology & life science teachers" (PDF). The American Biology Teacher. Vol. 52, no. 1. pp. 10–21. doi:10.2307/4449018. JSTOR 4449018. Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 October 2017.
- Shermer M (2011). "Understanding the believing brain: Why science is the only way out of belief-dependent realism". Scientific American. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0711-85. Archived from the original on 30 August 2016. Retrieved 14 August 2016.
- Lack C (10 October 2013). "What does Scientific Literacy look like in the 21st Century?". Great Plains Skeptic. Skeptic Ink Network. Archived from the original on 13 April 2014. Retrieved 9 April 2014.
- Evans JS (2003). "In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning". Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 7 (10): 454–459. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.012. PMID 14550493. S2CID 12508462. Archived from the original on 21 November 2018. Retrieved 15 October 2020.
- Hansson SO (2017). Zalta EN (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. ISSN 1095-5054. Archived from the original on 10 May 2019. Retrieved 16 April 2018.
- Sager (2008), p. 10. Sager C, ed. (2008). "Voices for evolution" (PDF). National Center for Science Education. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 December 2010. Retrieved 21 May 2010.
- Gould SJ (1997). "Nonoverlapping magisteria". Natural History. No. 106. pp. 16–22. Archived from the original on 4 January 2017.
- "Royal Society statement on evolution, creationism and intelligent design" (Press release). London: Royal Society. 11 April 2006. Archived from the original on 13 October 2007.
- Pendle G. "Popular Science Feature – When Science Fiction is Science Fact". Archived from the original on 14 February 2006.
- Thagard (1978). Thagard PR (1978). "Why astrology is a pseudoscience". PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. 1978 (1): 223–234. doi:10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1978.1.192639. ISSN 0270-8647. S2CID 147050929. Archived from the original on 28 March 2019. Retrieved 5 November 2018.
- Bird A (2008). "The Historical Turn in the Philosophy of Science" (PDF). In Psillos S, Curd M (eds.). Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Science. Abingdon: Routledge. pp. 9, 14. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 June 2013.
- Gordin MD (2015). "That a clear line of demarcation has separated science from pseudoscience". In Numbers RL, Kampourakis K (eds.). Newton's Apple and Other Myths about Science. Harvard University Press. pp. 219–25. ISBN 978-0-674-91547-3. Archived from the original on 11 October 2021. Retrieved 11 January 2022.
- Laudan L (1983). "The Demise of the Demarcation Problem". In Cohen RS, Laudan L (eds.). Physics, Philosophy and Psychoanalysis: Essays in Honor of Adolf Grünbaum. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 76. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. pp. 111–127. ISBN 978-90-277-1533-3. Archived from the original on 25 September 2020. Retrieved 25 October 2015.
- The National Council Against Health Fraud (1994). "NCAHF Position Paper on Homeopathy". Archived from the original on 25 December 2018. Retrieved 19 January 2011.
- LeVine M (8 December 2016). "What scientists can teach us about fake news and disinformation". Business Insider. Archived from the original on 10 December 2016. Retrieved 15 December 2016.

worldcat.org (Global: 5^th place; English: 5^th place)

search.worldcat.org

Hansson SO (2008), "Science and Pseudoscience", Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, Section 2: The "science" of pseudoscience, ISSN 1095-5054, archived from the original on 6 September 2008, retrieved 8 April 2009
Rodríguez-Ferreiro J, Barberia I (21 December 2021). "Believers in pseudoscience present lower evidential criteria". Scientific Reports. 11 (1): 24352. Bibcode:2021NatSR..1124352R. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-03816-5. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 8692588. PMID 34934119.
Gropp RE (1 August 2003). "Evolution Activists Organize to Combat Pseudoscience in Public Schools". BioScience. 53 (8): 700. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0700:EAOTCP]2.0.CO;2. ISSN 0006-3568. S2CID 84435133.
Thagard (1978), pp. 223 ff. Thagard PR (1978). "Why astrology is a pseudoscience". PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. 1978 (1): 223–234. doi:10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1978.1.192639. ISSN 0270-8647. S2CID 147050929. Archived from the original on 28 March 2019. Retrieved 5 November 2018.
Popper KR (2002). Conjectures and refutations : the growth of scientific knowledge. London: Routledge. pp. 33–39. ISBN 0-415-28593-3. OCLC 49593492.
Thagard (1978), pp. 227–228. Thagard PR (1978). "Why astrology is a pseudoscience". PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. 1978 (1): 223–234. doi:10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1978.1.192639. ISSN 0270-8647. S2CID 147050929. Archived from the original on 28 March 2019. Retrieved 5 November 2018.
Ruscio (2002). Ruscio J (2002). Clear thinking with psychology : separating sense from nonsense. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole-Thomson Learning. ISBN 978-0-534-53659-6. OCLC 47013264.
Ruscio (2002), p. 120. Ruscio J (2002). Clear thinking with psychology : separating sense from nonsense. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole-Thomson Learning. ISBN 978-0-534-53659-6. OCLC 47013264.
Sources that criticize the entirety of AYUSH as a pseudo-scientific venture:
- Shrinivasan R (26 April 2015). "Questions over science swirl, but AYUSH stands firm". The Hindu. ISSN 0971-751X. Archived from the original on 27 August 2021. Retrieved 22 January 2019.
- Hansson SO (2017). Zalta EN (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. ISSN 1095-5054. Archived from the original on 10 May 2019. Retrieved 16 April 2018.
- Thagard (1978). Thagard PR (1978). "Why astrology is a pseudoscience". PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. 1978 (1): 223–234. doi:10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1978.1.192639. ISSN 0270-8647. S2CID 147050929. Archived from the original on 28 March 2019. Retrieved 5 November 2018.
- Mahdawi A (29 October 2018). "Is alkaline water a miracle cure – or BS? The science is in". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 1 December 2023.

Pseudoscience (English Wikipedia)

americanscientist.org (Global: 7,231st place; English: 5,635th place)

archive-it.org (Global: 910th place; English: 593rd place)

wayback.archive-it.org

archive.org (Global: 6th place; English: 6th place)

arxiv.org (Global: 69th place; English: 59th place)

astronet.ru (Global: 3,201st place; English: low place)

vivovoco.astronet.ru

books.google.com (Global: 3rd place; English: 3rd place)

bris.ac.uk (Global: 4,848th place; English: 3,431st place)

eis.bris.ac.uk

businessinsider.com (Global: 140th place; English: 115th place)

calacademy.org (Global: 5,154th place; English: 3,727th place)

deccanherald.com (Global: 516th place; English: 291st place)

doi.org (Global: 2nd place; English: 2nd place)

edcipr.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

etymonline.com (Global: 287th place; English: 321st place)

exlibrisgroup.com (Global: 9,042nd place; English: 5,814th place)

unsw-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com

firstpost.com (Global: 283rd place; English: 179th place)

foxnews.com (Global: 152nd place; English: 120th place)

gallup.com (Global: 2,558th place; English: 1,868th place)

harrisinteractive.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

harvard.edu (Global: 18th place; English: 17th place)

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

ieg-ego.eu (Global: low place; English: low place)

indiana.edu (Global: 2,113th place; English: 1,465th place)

innertraditions.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

jasoncolavito.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

jstor.org (Global: 26th place; English: 20th place)

klnran.ru (Global: low place; English: low place)

kommersant.ru (Global: 176th place; English: 1,455th place)

lander.edu (Global: low place; English: low place)

philosophy.lander.edu

lhup.edu (Global: low place; English: low place)

loc.gov (Global: 70th place; English: 63rd place)

lccn.loc.gov

lse.ac.uk (Global: 2,117th place; English: 1,361st place)

www2.lse.ac.uk

msu.edu (Global: 1,844th place; English: 1,231st place)

msutoday.msu.edu

ncahf.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

ncse.com (Global: low place; English: 9,698th place)

newsweek.com (Global: 269th place; English: 201st place)

nih.gov (Global: 4th place; English: 4th place)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

nsf.gov (Global: 3,828th place; English: 2,823rd place)

nytimes.com (Global: 7th place; English: 7th place)

oed.com (Global: 360th place; English: 231st place)

paul-rosenfels.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

philpapers.org (Global: 1,865th place; English: 1,260th place)

politcom.ru (Global: low place; English: low place)

popularscience.co.uk (Global: low place; English: low place)

psu.edu (Global: 207th place; English: 136th place)

citeseerx.ist.psu.edu

royalsoc.ac.uk (Global: low place; English: low place)

salon.com (Global: 456th place; English: 300th place)

sciencedaily.com (Global: 993rd place; English: 920th place)

sciencedirect.com (Global: 149th place; English: 178th place)

sciencenews.org (Global: 3,410th place; English: 2,939th place)

scientificamerican.com (Global: 896th place; English: 674th place)

semanticscholar.org (Global: 11th place; English: 8th place)

api.semanticscholar.org

senseaboutscience.org.uk (Global: low place; English: low place)

skepdic.com (Global: 4,757th place; English: 4,726th place)

skepticalinquirer.org (Global: 5,915th place; English: 3,332nd place)

skepticink.com (Global: low place; English: low place)

smithsonianmag.com (Global: 503rd place; English: 364th place)

springer.com (Global: 274th place; English: 309th place)

srmhp.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

stanford.edu (Global: 179th place; English: 183rd place)

plato.stanford.edu

stephenjaygould.org (Global: low place; English: low place)

thefreedictionary.com (Global: 614th place; English: 572nd place)

theguardian.com (Global: 12th place; English: 11th place)

thehindu.com (Global: 52nd place; English: 35th place)

uark.edu (Global: low place; English: 6,604th place)

physics.uark.edu

uncg.edu (Global: low place; English: 6,852nd place)

americanscientist.org (Global: 7,231^st place; English: 5,635^th place)

archive-it.org (Global: 910^th place; English: 593^rd place)

archive.org (Global: 6^th place; English: 6^th place)

arxiv.org (Global: 69^th place; English: 59^th place)

astronet.ru (Global: 3,201^st place; English: low place)

books.google.com (Global: 3^rd place; English: 3^rd place)

bris.ac.uk (Global: 4,848^th place; English: 3,431^st place)

businessinsider.com (Global: 140^th place; English: 115^th place)

calacademy.org (Global: 5,154^th place; English: 3,727^th place)

deccanherald.com (Global: 516^th place; English: 291^st place)

doi.org (Global: 2^nd place; English: 2^nd place)

etymonline.com (Global: 287^th place; English: 321^st place)

exlibrisgroup.com (Global: 9,042^nd place; English: 5,814^th place)

firstpost.com (Global: 283^rd place; English: 179^th place)

foxnews.com (Global: 152^nd place; English: 120^th place)

gallup.com (Global: 2,558^th place; English: 1,868^th place)

harvard.edu (Global: 18^th place; English: 17^th place)

indiana.edu (Global: 2,113^th place; English: 1,465^th place)

jstor.org (Global: 26^th place; English: 20^th place)

kommersant.ru (Global: 176^th place; English: 1,455^th place)

loc.gov (Global: 70^th place; English: 63^rd place)

lse.ac.uk (Global: 2,117^th place; English: 1,361^st place)

msu.edu (Global: 1,844^th place; English: 1,231^st place)

ncse.com (Global: low place; English: 9,698^th place)

newsweek.com (Global: 269^th place; English: 201^st place)

nih.gov (Global: 4^th place; English: 4^th place)

nsf.gov (Global: 3,828^th place; English: 2,823^rd place)

nytimes.com (Global: 7^th place; English: 7^th place)

oed.com (Global: 360^th place; English: 231^st place)

philpapers.org (Global: 1,865^th place; English: 1,260^th place)

psu.edu (Global: 207^th place; English: 136^th place)

salon.com (Global: 456^th place; English: 300^th place)

sciencedaily.com (Global: 993^rd place; English: 920^th place)

sciencedirect.com (Global: 149^th place; English: 178^th place)

sciencenews.org (Global: 3,410^th place; English: 2,939^th place)

scientificamerican.com (Global: 896^th place; English: 674^th place)

semanticscholar.org (Global: 11^th place; English: 8^th place)

skepdic.com (Global: 4,757^th place; English: 4,726^th place)

skepticalinquirer.org (Global: 5,915^th place; English: 3,332^nd place)

smithsonianmag.com (Global: 503^rd place; English: 364^th place)

springer.com (Global: 274^th place; English: 309^th place)

stanford.edu (Global: 179^th place; English: 183^rd place)

thefreedictionary.com (Global: 614^th place; English: 572^nd place)

theguardian.com (Global: 12^th place; English: 11^th place)

thehindu.com (Global: 52^nd place; English: 35^th place)

uark.edu (Global: low place; English: 6,604^th place)

uncg.edu (Global: low place; English: 6,852^nd place)

uow.edu.au (Global: 6,834^th place; English: 4,564^th place)

utexas.edu (Global: 916^th place; English: 706^th place)

web.archive.org (Global: 1^st place; English: 1^st place)

worldcat.org (Global: 5^th place; English: 5^th place)