Pure fusion weapon (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "Pure fusion weapon" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
166th place
121st place
low place
low place
18th place
17th place
2nd place
2nd place
69th place
59th place
3rd place
3rd place
low place
low place
6,897th place
6,705th place

arxiv.org

  • Gsponer, Andre (2005). "Fourth Generation Nuclear Weapons: Military effectiveness and collateral effects". arXiv:physics/0510071.

books.google.com

doi.org

harvard.edu

ui.adsabs.harvard.edu

nextbigfuture.com

scienceandglobalsecurity.org

sfgate.com

  • Davidson, Keay (1998-07-20). "Activists: Super-laser may bring tiny nukes". San Francisco Chronicle. Critics raise another objection to the development of pure-fusion bombs: A nation could more easily hide the manufacture of such bombs than of ordinary nuclear weapons. The reason is that pure-fusion bombs would not require uranium or plutonium, whose radioactivity can be detected by U.N. weapons inspectors. The present way to "prevent the spread or proliferation of nuclear weapons is by detecting the materials needed to make nuclear weapons, (namely) plutonium and highly enriched uranium," Cabasso says. "Since you don't need those for pure-fusion weapons, then that means of detecting the existence of the weapons disappears."

unige.ch

cui.unige.ch