RT (TV network) (English Wikipedia)

Analysis of information sources in references of the Wikipedia article "RT (TV network)" in English language version.

refsWebsite
Global rank English rank
1st place
1st place
1,021st place
low place
12th place
11th place
5th place
5th place
2nd place
2nd place
34th place
27th place
49th place
47th place
4,546th place
2,560th place
20th place
30th place
11th place
8th place
7th place
7th place
737th place
605th place
36th place
33rd place
1,388th place
972nd place
3rd place
3rd place
476th place
282nd place
330th place
222nd place
8th place
10th place
312th place
197th place
28th place
26th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
61st place
54th place
68th place
117th place
170th place
119th place
4,037th place
2,203rd place
108th place
80th place
259th place
188th place
115th place
82nd place
9th place
13th place
681st place
492nd place
4,389th place
2,638th place
13th place
12th place
264th place
249th place
551st place
406th place
1,781st place
1,533rd place
66th place
350th place
1,040th place
623rd place
274th place
309th place
2,224th place
1,900th place
140th place
115th place
1,368th place
793rd place
1,116th place
790th place
406th place
258th place
456th place
300th place
41st place
34th place
4,686th place
3,826th place
1,347th place
909th place
114th place
90th place
32nd place
21st place
99th place
77th place
3,286th place
2,369th place
444th place
1,507th place
791st place
550th place
556th place
324th place
748th place
458th place
54th place
48th place
1,948th place
1,153rd place
low place
low place
8,677th place
5,593rd place
2,921st place
2,118th place
low place
low place
2,523rd place
1,574th place
613th place
456th place
7,377th place
low place
175th place
137th place
120th place
125th place
5,396th place
4,339th place
3,645th place
6,045th place
2,120th place
1,328th place
18th place
17th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
4,056th place
low place
357th place
2,226th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
855th place
3,493rd place
380th place
933rd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
6,703rd place
4,200th place
low place
low place
26th place
20th place
4,313th place
2,441st place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
254th place
236th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
176th place
1,455th place
14th place
14th place
92nd place
72nd place
3,067th place
3,545th place
5,044th place
5,297th place
204th place
353rd place
412th place
266th place
low place
low place
1,029th place
657th place
3,234th place
2,284th place
48th place
39th place
1,146th place
683rd place
low place
low place
2,668th place
4,275th place
38th place
40th place
294th place
205th place
770th place
472nd place
786th place
558th place
109th place
87th place
198th place
154th place
306th place
1,951st place
low place
low place
1,084th place
617th place
low place
low place
3,287th place
2,285th place
1,127th place
691st place
293rd place
203rd place
low place
low place
466th place
349th place
2,742nd place
1,754th place
15th place
16th place
303rd place
1,010th place
457th place
272nd place
481st place
508th place
9,763rd place
5,321st place
139th place
108th place
1,108th place
661st place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,064th place
992nd place
469th place
3,640th place
6,682nd place
4,170th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
low place
6,277th place
6,190th place
4,693rd place
low place
low place
277th place
196th place
2,504th place
5,373rd place
low place
low place
1,811th place
1,036th place
40th place
58th place
low place
low place
2,003rd place
1,161st place
4,356th place
2,724th place
431st place
274th place
1,451st place
5,740th place
268th place
215th place
22nd place
19th place
5,519th place
3,316th place
1,746th place
1,165th place
269th place
201st place
low place
9,617th place
581st place
738th place
low place
low place
2,088th place
1,251st place
784th place
604th place
3,833rd place
2,331st place
low place
low place
low place
low place
8,531st place
low place
668th place
2,514th place
low place
low place
8,349th place
4,860th place
3,208th place
1,803rd place
low place
low place
low place
low place
1,940th place
low place
3,814th place
2,595th place
497th place
371st place
low place
low place
179th place
183rd place
210th place
157th place
990th place
621st place
4,198th place
2,356th place
965th place
579th place
low place
low place
low place
low place
23rd place
32nd place
low place
low place
2,397th place
2,494th place
2,590th place
8,136th place
2,734th place
1,606th place
6,864th place
3,942nd place
928th place
651st place
433rd place
284th place
30th place
24th place
6,788th place
4,911th place
388th place
265th place
117th place
145th place
low place
low place

9to5mac.com

abc.net.au

adamvstheman.com

algemeiner.com

aljazeera.com

archive.today

  • ""Нет никакой объективности"" [There is no objectivity]. Kommersant (in Russian). 7 April 2012. Archived from the original on 5 December 2017. Retrieved 21 March 2021. Сейчас ни с кем не воюем. А вот в 2008 году воевали. Министерство обороны воевало с Грузией, а информационную войну вели мы, причем со всем западным миром. Ну невозможно только начинать делать оружие, когда война уже началась! Поэтому Министерство обороны сейчас ни с кем не воюет, но готово к обороне. Так и мы. [Currently we are not at war with anyone. But in 2008 – we were. The Ministry of Defence was at war with Georgia, and we were waging an information war, and with the entire Western world. Well, it's impossible just to start making weapons when the war has already begun! Therefore, the Ministry of Defence is now not at war with anyone, but is ready for defense. So are we.]

arstechnica.com

barb.co.uk

bbc.co.uk

bbc.com

belfercenter.org

bloomberg.com

books.google.com

britannica.com

broadbandtvnews.com

bu.edu

businessinsider.co.id

businessinsider.com

businessinsider.com.au

buzzfeed.com

buzzfeednews.com

c-span.org

canberratimes.com.au

cbc.ca

cbsnews.com

cervantes.es

channelnewsasia.com

chronicle.gi

cjr.org

cnn.com

edition.cnn.com

cnn.com

transcripts.cnn.com

comnews.ru

counterhate.com

cpj.org

csmonitor.com

cuni.cz

dl1.cuni.cz

democratic-integrity.eu

denverpost.com

digitalspy.co.uk

doi.org

doi.org

dx.doi.org

dw.com

e-ir.info

economist.com

elibrary.ru

engadget.com

ethz.ch

css.ethz.ch

etis.ee

euractiv.com

europa.eu

europarl.europa.eu

eur-lex.europa.eu

consilium.europa.eu

europe1.fr

euvsdisinfo.eu

fakecheck-rt.de

fastcompany.com

forbes.com

foreignaffairs.com

foreignpolicy.com

fortune.com

france24.com

ft.com

gazeta.ru

en.gazeta.ru

ghostarchive.org

go.com

abcnews.go.com

gov.pl

government.ru

haaretz.com

harvard.edu

misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu

  • Nassetta, Jack; Gross, Kimberly (30 October 2020). "State media warning labels can counteract the effects of foreign misinformation". Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. Harvard University: Harvard Kennedy School. doi:10.37016/mr-2020-45. Archived from the original on 1 March 2021. Retrieved 21 March 2021. However, when it comes to disinformation from state-controlled media sources platforms' options are more limited. Most often channels like Russia's RT and Iran's PressTV do not technically violate a platform's terms of service and so cannot be removed. However, they still play a vital role in the disinformation ecosystem. Not only do they put out disinformation through their websites and social media channels, they are key nodes in coordinated campaigns, as well. For instance, the content originally posted on RT will be reposted down a chain of websites until it appears to be an organic article on an American outlet (Nimmo, 2017).

hollywoodreporter.com

huffingtonpost.co.uk

huffingtonpost.com

ibtimes.co.uk

iemmys.tv

ijoc.org

independent.co.uk

inews.co.uk

infobae.com

interatr.org

interfax.ru

ipsnews.net

israelnationalnews.com

jofcp.org

journalism.org

jstor.org

kcl.ac.uk

kclpure.kcl.ac.uk

khpg.org

kommersant.com

kommersant.ru

  • ""Нет никакой объективности"" [There is no objectivity]. Kommersant (in Russian). 7 April 2012. Archived from the original on 5 December 2017. Retrieved 21 March 2021. Сейчас ни с кем не воюем. А вот в 2008 году воевали. Министерство обороны воевало с Грузией, а информационную войну вели мы, причем со всем западным миром. Ну невозможно только начинать делать оружие, когда война уже началась! Поэтому Министерство обороны сейчас ни с кем не воюет, но готово к обороне. Так и мы. [Currently we are not at war with anyone. But in 2008 – we were. The Ministry of Defence was at war with Georgia, and we were waging an information war, and with the entire Western world. Well, it's impossible just to start making weapons when the war has already begun! Therefore, the Ministry of Defence is now not at war with anyone, but is ready for defense. So are we.]

kremlin.ru

en.kremlin.ru

ku.dk

curis.ku.dk

latimes.com

latimesblogs.latimes.com

lifenews.ru

  • Ополченцы сообщили о сбитом Ан-26 на востоке Украины. LifeNews (in Russian). 17 July 2014. Archived from the original on 14 March 2016. Retrieved 17 July 2014. On July 17 near the village of Rassypnoye over the Torez city in Donetsk region an An-26 transport plane of Ukrainian Air Force was taken down, said the militia. According to them, the plane crashed somewhere near the "Progress" mine, away from residential areas. According to one of the militias, at about 17:30 local time an An-26 flew over the city. It was hit by a rocket, there was an explosion and the plane went to the ground, leaving a black smoke. Debris fell from the sky

lrt.lt

lsm.lv

eng.lsm.lv

mcclatchydc.com

mediterraneocronaca.it

  • Fletcher, Richard; Cornia, Alessio; Graves, Lucas; Nielsen, Rasmus Kleis (1 January 2018). "Measuring the reach of "fake news" and online disinformation in Europe" (PDF). Australasian Policing. 10 (2). Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 February 2022. Retrieved 25 February 2022 – via Mediterraneo Cronaca. For comparative purposes, we also included two prominent Russian news sites which have featured in European policy discussions around disinformation, namely Russia Today (RT) and Sputnik. These Russian state-backed organisations are clearly different from sites that engage in for-profit fabrication of false news, but both independent fact-checkers and the EU's European External Action Service East Stratcom Task Force have identified multiple instances where these sites have published disinformation.

medium.com

meduza.io

msn.com

nationaljournal.com

ned.org

neplpadome.lv

neweasterneurope.eu

newrepublic.com

news.com.au

newslaundry.com

newstatesman.com

newsweek.com

newyorkfestivals.com

niemanlab.org

npr.org

nytimes.com

nytimes.com

mobile.nytimes.com

octagon.media

ofcom.org.uk

ofcom.org.uk

stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk

okwonga.com

omnifeed.com

onderzoeksraad.nl

open.ac.uk

oro.open.ac.uk

ox.ac.uk

ora.ox.ac.uk

  • Elswah, Mona; Howard, Philip N (1 October 2020). ""Anything that Causes Chaos": The Organizational Behavior of Russia Today (RT)". Journal of Communication. 70 (5). Oxford University Press: 623–645. doi:10.1093/joc/jqaa027. Retrieved 21 March 2021. Across our interviews, our respondents agreed that the goals of the channel since 2008 have been and still are as follows. First, to push the idea that Western countries have as many problems as Russia. Second, to encourage conspiracy theories about media institutions in the West in order to discredit and delegitimize them. This is clearly adherent to the channel's "Questions More" slogan. Third, to create controversy and to make people criticize the channel, because it suggests that the channel is important, an approach that would particularly help RT managers get more funding from the government.

reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk

pbs.org

politico.com

politico.eu

politifact.com

poynter.org

pravda.ru

english.pravda.ru

premier.gov.ru

archive.premier.gov.ru

pressgazette.co.uk

prnewswire.com

rand.org

rapidtvnews.com

rbc.ru

top.rbc.ru

rbth.com

researchgate.net

reuters.com

rferl.org

rsf.org

rt.com

rt.com

actualidad.rt.com

arabic.rt.com

russian.rt.com

francais.rt.com

rtvi.com

russia-briefing.com

salon.com

sbis.ru

sbs.com.au

seattleglobalist.com

semanticscholar.org

api.semanticscholar.org

sky.com

slate.com

somamagazine.com

spcentrs.lv

  • Reire, Gunda (2015). "Euro-Atlantic values and Russia's propaganda in the Euro-Atlantic space" (PDF). Rocznik Instytutu Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej. 13 (4). Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 November 2021. Retrieved 21 March 2021 – via Center for International Studies. Nowadays, Russia attacks the Western value of rationality and uses the argument of "the second opinion" or plurality of opinions. The phrase "the second opinion" has even become the slogan of RT. For instance, this propaganda channel used the public opinion's contention as to the nature of the Iraq war, to sell itself as an impartial, objective media outlet in the USA. Overall, Russian propaganda involves a clash of political systems, which is more dangerous than the old-school Soviet propaganda.

spectator.co.uk

spiegel.de

splcenter.org

springer.com

link.springer.com

standpointmag.co.uk

stanford.edu

cyber.fsi.stanford.edu

state.gov

state.gov

2007-2017-blogs.state.gov

stuff.co.nz

techpolicy.press

telegraph.co.uk

theage.com.au

theaustralian.com.au

thebulletin.org

theconversation.com

thedailybeast.com

theglobeandmail.com

theguardian.com

thehill.com

theintercept.com

themoscownews.com

themoscowtimes.com

thenation.com

thetimes.co.uk

theverge.com

time.com

time.com

world.time.com

tol.org

translate.google.com

tumblr.com

rtwatchcuj.tumblr.com

tvtonight.com.au

twitter.com

ucg.ac.me

ukrinform.net

universitypressscholarship.com

oxford.universitypressscholarship.com

usatoday.com

variety.com

vice.com

vice.com

news.vice.com

voanews.com

washingtonpost.com

washingtontimes.com

web.archive.org

wikileaks.org

worldtomorrow.wikileaks.org

wikileaks.org

wikipedia.org

pl.wikipedia.org

  • Reire, Gunda (2015). "Euro-Atlantic values and Russia's propaganda in the Euro-Atlantic space" (PDF). Rocznik Instytutu Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej. 13 (4). Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 November 2021. Retrieved 21 March 2021 – via Center for International Studies. Nowadays, Russia attacks the Western value of rationality and uses the argument of "the second opinion" or plurality of opinions. The phrase "the second opinion" has even become the slogan of RT. For instance, this propaganda channel used the public opinion's contention as to the nature of the Iraq war, to sell itself as an impartial, objective media outlet in the USA. Overall, Russian propaganda involves a clash of political systems, which is more dangerous than the old-school Soviet propaganda.

worldcat.org

worldofmedia.ru

wyborcza.pl

yahoo.com

news.yahoo.com

yle.fi

youtube.com

zdnet.com